Plant 44 Audit Reports - Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

More documents

Recommendations

Info

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution authorized to DoD components and their contractors only; administrative/operational use; March 16,2006.Other requests for this document shall be referred to the Chief, Acquisition Environmental Safety & Health Division,Engineering Directorate, ASC/ENV, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433were directed toward sampling major facets of industrial hygiene performance during the periodunder review, but it is important to recognize that this method is intended to uncover major programdeficiencies, and this audit might not have identified all potential problems.Audit FindingsA. Previous Findings:1. Bldg, 830: Outside the building there were multiple unsecured compressed gascylinders, this is a repeat finding, third year in a row. (Corrected)B. New Findings:1. Bldg. 817: In the Calendar Shop Area there was an operation being performed on acounter top which was giving off a significant smell of solvent vapors. Upon examination ofMaterial Safety Data Sheets provided by Raytheon it was determined that this potentiallyrepresented an exposure to materials that could cause narcosis and cardiac problems. On theadjacent wall there was located a table top that had a slotted hood local exhaust ventilation system.The industrial hygienist at Raytheon advised that he would conduct an analysis of the operation todetermine the risk and recommend appropriate control measures.C. Overall OpinionBased on the review of the program at Plant 44, Raytheon, over the last 8 years, I believe that asignificant improvement of the IH program continues to be made over the previous years and meetsall applicable governmental and company policies and procedures. This opinion is based on myprofessional judgment and the application of USAF established audit procedures. I wish to thankthe IH staff for their assistance in the effort.Recommendation: That all open items be accomplished as soon as feasible. That the IH staffbecommended for their continued improvement of the work sitesWilliam J. LaFountainTechnical Expert for Industrial Hygieneand Occupational HealthUSAF ASC/ENVVAttachment 2
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution authorized to DoD components and their contractors only; administrative/operational use;March 16, 2006. Other requests for this document shall be referred to the Chief, AcquisitionEnvironmental Safety & Health Division, Engineering Directorate, ASC/ENV, Wright Patterson Air ForceBase, OB 45433Air Force Plant 44 Facilities Review13 -16 March 2006Explosive Safety Evaluation1.0 OVERVIEW: The annual ASC/EMV Industrial Facilities Review of the RaytheonMissile Systems Company (RMSC), Air Force Plant 44, Tucson, Arizona, was conducted13 - 16 Mar 2006. Maj Bob Schmedake, MSW/ENSA, on behalfof ASC/ENV,performed the Ordnance Safety evaluation. Mr. Ronald Orr, RMSC Ordnance Safety,and Douglas Long accompanied Maj. Schmedake. The purpose of the review was toconduct an examination ofthe RMSC responsible facilities/workplaces and evaluate theOrdnance Safety Program administration and its effectiveness.2.0 Previous Observations:3.02006 FindingsMaj. Schmedake accompanied the facilities electricians on their visual inspection of thelightning protection system at Bid 864. The electricians performed a thorough inspectionof the existing air terminals, conductors, ground conductors, and ground rods. Theelectricians found and documented discrepancies such as loose air terminals. Also notedwere the presence of an air vent at southern test cell for Bid 864, and a mast withelectrical cable, installed on the northern test cell. Both of these structures extend abovethe air terminals and have no lighting protection installed.A review of the explosive site plans in work was conducted. There are 22 explosive siteplans that have been submitted to the Phoenix DCMA office since early 2005. Of these,the AFMC-AFP44-05-S01 plan has made it through DCMA, ACO, PCO, ASC, AFMC,AFSC and is not at the DDESB. The remaining 21 plans are still with the PhoenixDCMA review and have not been sent to ASC yet. The earliest of the plan submittalsoccurred in July 2005 and as late as January 2006. The delays in ESP reviews haveimpacted efficient operations at Raytheon.Among the 22 ESPs there are 4 ESPs on AFP44 property (others are in work for otherRaytheon facilities) that were required to be submitted by the Phoenix DCMA forfacilities with HC 1.4 explosives. There is no requirement in 000 4145 .26M, 0006055.9, or AFM 91-201 for these site plans. It is unclear why the contractor was requiredto do more than license the facilities for the 1.4 cabinet and operating locations.Attachment 3
Page 1 and 2:
RECORD REPRODUCTION COVER SHEETThe
Page 3 and 4:
TRIP REPORT1. PERSONS MAKING THIS T
Page 5 and 6:
ATTACHMENTS:I. Normal Maintenance R
Page 7 and 8:
d. Building 811 A walk-through of t
Page 9 and 10:
ii. Exterior wall is damaged and bi
Page 11 and 12:
Photo 3Building 833 Damaged WallPho
Page 13 and 14:
4. FACILITY REVIEW OBSERVATIONSThe
Page 15 and 16:
4.4.2. Building 80 I, room G 1315.
Page 17 and 18:
Air Force Plant 44 Facilities Revie
Page 19 and 20:
3.17 Finding 04-17. Bldg 830. Cinci
Page 21 and 22:
The audit followed an audit protoco
Page 23 and 24:
AFP 44 ANNUAL FACILITIES REVIEW8 -
Page 25 and 26:
local standards and procedures and
Page 27 and 28:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution a
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
•FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistributio
Page 39 and 40:
•FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistributio
Page 41 and 42: •FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistributio
Page 43 and 44: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution a
Page 89 and 90: •FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistributio
Page 91: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution a
Page 106 and 107: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYTRIP REPORT1.
Page 108 and 109: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY8. IMPACT ON A
Page 110 and 111: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYc. Building 81
Page 112 and 113: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYbb. Building 8
Page 114 and 115: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYThe review fol
Page 116 and 117: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY3.0. Structura
Page 118 and 119: -_._-----~-,FOR F Ie N3.1. I I. Acc
Page 120 and 121: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY4.0 Any questi
Page 122 and 123: For Official Use Onlysprinkler cove
Page 124 and 125: ,TRIP REPORTl. PERSONS MAKING THIS
Page 126: g. Equipment Issues1) The Raytheon
show all

Plant 44 Audit Reports - Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?