12.07.2015 Views

Plant 44 Audit Reports - Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

Plant 44 Audit Reports - Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

Plant 44 Audit Reports - Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution authorized to DoD components and their contractors only; administrative/operational use; March16,2006. Other requests for this document shall be referred to the Chief, Acquisition Environmental Safety &Health Division, Engineering Directorate, ASCIENV, <strong>Wright</strong> <strong>Patterson</strong> <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> <strong>Base</strong>, OH 45433Dennis TwardowskiHoward CampbellKelly MarionJean RobertsPaul KramkowskiPedro VasquezDoug LongBart ParkerWayne CranPatricia TerrienAl BuhlDCMAKaryn PierowayLorna TaylorFire DepartmentFire DepartmentFire DepartmentEnvironmental Health & SafetyEnvironmental Health & SafetyFacility ServicesEnvironmental Health & SafetyEnvironmental Health & SafetyEnvironmental Health & SafetyProperty ManagementMetal Composite FabtPropertyProperty6. DISCUSSIONS AND FINDINGS:a. The Facilities Review began with an in-brief between the team members andRaytheon Company personnel. The briefing consisted of progress status on past findings,new objectives, and the week's agenda.b. All team members were paired with a Raytheon host. The tentative schedule wasagreed upon and the team was provided with a conference room so that we could convene atthe end of each day. Each team was also assigned with a person and camera to takephotographs of facilities and areas identified for an action.c. The findings and the information contained within this report were briefed toRaytheon on Thursday, 16 March 2006. The Raytheon team provided a list of work ordersthat had been initiated during the review and photographs on a CD disk.7. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS:a. The efforts of Raytheon to correct problems is commendable, however there are stillareas that require improvement. In general the plant appearance is adequate and provides asafe, productive working environment.b. Team members conducted their own independent reviews. The results, findings, andrecommendations are provided in the following attachments: Normal Maintenance (AttachmentI), Industrial Hygiene (Attachment 2), Explosive Safety (Attachment 3), Industrial Safety(Attachment 4) and Fire Protection (Attachment 5). The Industrial Safety <strong>Audit</strong> and FireProtection <strong>Audit</strong>s were suspended last year in order to accomplish the AFI 32-2001 mandatedFire Department Evaluation but were resumed for this years review.c. Raytheon personnel were cooperative. helpful, and supportive during this year'sannual facilities review.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!