Plant 44 Audit Reports - Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

More documents

Recommendations

Info

•FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution authorized to DoD components and their contractors only; administrative/operational use;March 16, 2006. Other requests for this document shall be referred to the Chief, AcquisitionEnvironmental Safety & Health Division, Engineering Directorate, ASC/ENV, Wright Patterson Air ForceBase, OH 45433ACTION REQUIRED: There needs to be resolution within the Phoenix DCMA on howto handle reviews in an expeditious manner. DCMA needs to understand their role onGOCO explosive site plan reviews, and they need to enforce the requirements withoutexceeding them as they have done on the Hazard Class 1.4 facilities. The lack ofunderstanding of these requirements has had a negative impact on efficient operations atRaytheon.ROBERT A. SCHMEDAKE, Major, USAFRIndividual Mobilization AugmenteeWeapons SafetyAttachment 3
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution authorized to DoD components and their contractors only; administrative/operational use;March 16, 2006. Other requests for this document shall be referred to the Chief, AcquisitionEnvironmental Safety & Health Division, Engineering Directorate, ASC/ENV, Wright Patterson Air ForceBase, OH 45433AIR FORCE PLANT 44 FACILITIES REVIEW13 -16 March 2006Industrial Safety Evaluation].0 OVERVIEW: The annual ASC/EMV Industrial Facilities Review of the RaytheonMissile Systems Company (RMSC), Air Force Plant 44, Tucson, Arizona, was conducted13 - 16 Mar 2006. Mr Bill Kapella, ASC, DET l/SE, on behalf of ASC/ENV, performedthe Industrial Safety evaluation. Mr. Richard Force, RMSC Safety, and Randy RogersGardner, RMSC Compliance accompanied Mr. Kapella. The purpose of the review wasto conduct an examination of the RMSC responsible facilities/workplaces and evaluatethe Occupational Safety Program administration and its effectiveness. Due to the timeconstraints, it was not intended to perform a thorough examination of the facilitiesvisited; therefore, all hazards and/or deficiencies that may exist within the work placemay not be identified.2.0 PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS: After visual inspection from the 2004 report thefollowing are repeat findings and are reprinted below for review and action as required.2.0.1 2004 Finding 3.1 General Finding. Lightning Protection: Several facilities thatwere protected with lighting protection have discrepancies associated with the airterminal, down cable, metallic material higher than air terminals, and/or sidearcing hazard potential. Example:2.0.2 2004 Finding 3.1.1. bldg 849 has roofstairs taller than surrounding airterminals and down wires painted,2.0.3 2004 Finding 3.1.2. bldg 827C has a newly installed exhaust/vent system andassociated tie down cable higher than surrounding air terminals,2.0.4 2004 Finding 3.1.3. bldg 827A has the down wires painted.2.0.5 2004 Finding 3.1.4. bldg 855 has down wires painted and has metal conduit inthe close proximity ofthe down wire causing a side arc hazard,2.0.6 2004 Finding 3.1.5. bldg 864 has down wires painted.Recommend checking the PM card to ensure the above discrepancies are listed as amandatory checkfor all lightning protection PMs on allfacilities equipped with lightningprotection.2.0.7 2004 Finding 04.11. Bldg 830, outside. Acetylene compressed gas cylinders notproperly secured. (Carl's Photo #()015)Attachment 4
Page 1 and 2:
RECORD REPRODUCTION COVER SHEETThe
Page 3 and 4:
TRIP REPORT1. PERSONS MAKING THIS T
Page 5 and 6:
ATTACHMENTS:I. Normal Maintenance R
Page 7 and 8:
d. Building 811 A walk-through of t
Page 9 and 10:
ii. Exterior wall is damaged and bi
Page 11 and 12:
Photo 3Building 833 Damaged WallPho
Page 13 and 14:
4. FACILITY REVIEW OBSERVATIONSThe
Page 15 and 16:
4.4.2. Building 80 I, room G 1315.
Page 17 and 18:
Air Force Plant 44 Facilities Revie
Page 19 and 20:
3.17 Finding 04-17. Bldg 830. Cinci
Page 21 and 22:
The audit followed an audit protoco
Page 23 and 24:
AFP 44 ANNUAL FACILITIES REVIEW8 -
Page 25 and 26:
local standards and procedures and
Page 27 and 28:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution a
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
•FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistributio
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution a
Page 89 and 90: •FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistributio
Page 93: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution a
Page 106 and 107: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYTRIP REPORT1.
Page 108 and 109: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY8. IMPACT ON A
Page 110 and 111: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYc. Building 81
Page 112 and 113: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYbb. Building 8
Page 114 and 115: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYThe review fol
Page 116 and 117: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY3.0. Structura
Page 118 and 119: -_._-----~-,FOR F Ie N3.1. I I. Acc
Page 120 and 121: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY4.0 Any questi
Page 122 and 123: For Official Use Onlysprinkler cove
Page 124 and 125: ,TRIP REPORTl. PERSONS MAKING THIS
Page 126: g. Equipment Issues1) The Raytheon
show all

Plant 44 Audit Reports - Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?