Plant 44 Audit Reports - Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

More documents

Recommendations

Info

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYThe review followed an review protocol based on Air Force established reviewprocedures, which was modified for the Raytheon review. It should be understood thatthe review consisted ofevaluating a sample of practices and was conducted in a shortspan of time relative to the review period. Efforts were directed toward sampling majorfacets of industrial hygiene performance during the period under review, but it isimportant to recognize that this method is intended to uncover major programdeficiencies, and this review might not have identified all potential problems.Review FindingsA. Previous Findings:I. Bldg. 817: In the Calendar Shop Area there was an operation beingperformed on a counter top which was giving off a significant smell of solvent vapors.Upon examination of Material Safety Data Sheets provided by Raytheon it wasdetermined that this potentially represented an exposure to materials that could causenarcosis and cardiac problems. On the adjacent waIl there was located a table top thathad a slotted hood local exhaust ventilation system. The industrial hygienist at Raytheonadvised that he would conduct an analysis of the operation to determine the risk andrecommend appropriate control measures. (Corrected by IH evaluation and sampling.)2. Overall AFP 44: Storage of compressed Gas Cylinders has significantlyimproved and is no longer considered a finding.B. New Findings: Bldg 833: In the garage area a gasoline powered forklift was beingfueled inside the building. The garage area does not contain the appropriate electrical orother necessary protective equipment to allow for fueling of vehicles. (This wascorrected by the building supervisor immediately upon being brought to hisattention.)C. Overall OpinionBased on the review of the program at Plant 44, Raytheon, over the last 9 years, I believethat a significant improvement of the IH program continues to be made over the previousyears and meets all applicable governmental and company policies and procedures. Thisopinion is based on my professional judgment and the application of USAF establishedreview procedures. I wish to thank the IH staff for their assistance in the effort.Recommendation: That all open items be accomplished as soon as feasible. That the IHstaff be commended for their continued improvement of the work sitesWilliam J LaFountainTechnical expert for Industrial Hygieneand Occupational HealthUSAF ASC/ENVVAttachment 2
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYAFP 44 ANNUAL FACILITIES REVIEWRAYTHEON SYSTEMS COMPANY4 - 8 FEBRUARY 2008FIRE PROTECTION OPERATIONS1.0 The annual ASC/ENV Industrial Facilities Review ofthe Raytheon Missile SystemsCompany (RMSC), Air Force Plant 44. Tucson, Arizona, was conducted 4 - 8 Feb 08.Mr Bill Kapella, ASC/ENV Det I Fire Marshal, on behalf of ASC/ENV, performed thereview ofthe Fire Department Operations. The purpose ofthe review was to conduct anexamination of the RMSC Fire Department operations for effectiveness, performance,knowledge, and abilities. Due to the time constraints, it was not intended to perform athorough examination; therefore, not all deficiencies that may exist within theiroperations were identified.2.0 NFPA 1410 Fire Exercise: On 5 Feb 08. at approximately 1330, an NFPA 1410exercise was conducted by the day shift adjacent to Bldg 827. The exercise was used as atimed response trial and to measure the initial attack capability of the Fire Department'sfirst responding units and personnel for performance lAW NFPA 1410 Training forInitial Fire Attack, evolution No.1.2.1 The following observations were noted:2.1.1 The exercise was initiated via a radio transmission to the alarm room. The alarmroom operator did not repeat the correct information to the responding crews.Nevertheless, the crews responded and completed the exercise. (Action required)2.1.2 Excellent response from security to support the exercise.2.1.3 The Fire Department's recommended minimum time of3-minutes was met. Infact, the crews were able to lay a 300' supply line, pull a 150' attack line from oneside of the truck and a 150' backup line from the other, plus pump 300 GPM inless than 2-minutes. Their structural attack and abilities to respond were welldemonstrated.2.1.4 The plugman exposed himself to potential injuries by not using proper techniqueswhen wrapping the hose around the hydrant and securing it as the pumper droveaway. (Action required)2.1.5 At the start ofthe exercise, a real world fire alarm was received. The Chief incharge elected to send a crew of three firefighters to investigate. The personreporting information to the Fire Officer was well versed in requirements andprotocol. Radio communication from him to the Fire Officer demonstratedexcellent information on size up and evaluation of the emergency. As a result ofhis expertise in fire operations, no other response was necessary. saving time andexposure to additional crews.Attachment 3
Page 1 and 2:
RECORD REPRODUCTION COVER SHEETThe
Page 3 and 4:
TRIP REPORT1. PERSONS MAKING THIS T
Page 5 and 6:
ATTACHMENTS:I. Normal Maintenance R
Page 7 and 8:
d. Building 811 A walk-through of t
Page 9 and 10:
ii. Exterior wall is damaged and bi
Page 11 and 12:
Photo 3Building 833 Damaged WallPho
Page 13 and 14:
4. FACILITY REVIEW OBSERVATIONSThe
Page 15 and 16:
4.4.2. Building 80 I, room G 1315.
Page 17 and 18:
Air Force Plant 44 Facilities Revie
Page 19 and 20:
3.17 Finding 04-17. Bldg 830. Cinci
Page 21 and 22:
The audit followed an audit protoco
Page 23 and 24:
AFP 44 ANNUAL FACILITIES REVIEW8 -
Page 25 and 26:
local standards and procedures and
Page 27 and 28:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution a
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
•FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistributio
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution a
Page 89 and 90: •FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistributio
Page 106 and 107: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYTRIP REPORT1.
Page 108 and 109: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY8. IMPACT ON A
Page 110 and 111: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYc. Building 81
Page 112 and 113: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYbb. Building 8
Page 116 and 117: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY3.0. Structura
Page 118 and 119: -_._-----~-,FOR F Ie N3.1. I I. Acc
Page 120 and 121: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY4.0 Any questi
Page 122 and 123: For Official Use Onlysprinkler cove
Page 124 and 125: ,TRIP REPORTl. PERSONS MAKING THIS
Page 126: g. Equipment Issues1) The Raytheon
show all

Plant 44 Audit Reports - Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?