Plant 44 Audit Reports - Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3. Bldg, 830: In the welding area there were two compressed gas cylinders in astore room which were unsecured. In the center aisle the eyewash was blocked and twoflammable cabinets were missing the sidewall plugs. Outside the building there weremultiple unsecured compressed gas cylinders, this is a repeat finding.4. Bldg. 864: On the north side ofthe building outside there was an unsecuredcompressed gas cylinder.5. Bldg. 815: The mechanics room needs to be evaluated for the requirement ofeyewash. The loading dock was util izing an unapproved set of portable stairs to accessthe dock area. There were several improperly secured compressed gas cylinders on theloading dock.6. The portable eyewash bottles, which have an expiration date, were labeledwith a Raytheon label indicating no expiration.C. Overall OpinionBased on the review of the program at Plant 44, Raytheon, I believe that a significantimprovement ofthe IH program continues to be made over the previous years and meetsall applicable governmental and company policies and procedures. This opinion is basedon my professional judgment and the application of USAF established audit procedures. Iwish to thank the IH staff for their assistance in the effort.Recommendation: That all open items be accomplished. That the IH staff be commendedfor their continued improvement ofthe work sitesWilliam J LaFountainIndustrial HygienistUSAF ASC/ENVAttachment 4
AFP 44 ANNUAL FACILITIES REVIEW8 - 12 March 2004Fire Protection Operation1.0 The annual ASC/ENV Industrial Facilities Review of the Raytheon Missile SystemsCompany (RMSC), Air Force Plant 44, Tucson, Arizona, was conducted 8 - 12 Mar 04.Mr Bill Kapella, ASC/ENV Det I Fire Marshal, on behalf of ASC/ENV, performed thereview ofthe Fire Department Operations. The purpose of the review was to conduct anexamination of the RMSC Fire Department operations for effectiveness, performance,knowledge, and abilities. Due to the time constraints, it was not intended to perform athorough examination; therefore, not all deficiencies that may exist within theiroperations could be identified.2.0 NFPA 1410 Fire Exercise. On 10 Mar 04, approximately 0830, a NFPA 1410exercise was provided at bldg 866. The exercise was used to measure the initial attackcapability of the fire department's first responding units and personnel for performancelAW NFPA 1410 Trainingfor Initial Fire Attack.2.1 The following observations were noted:2.1.1 KUDOS. Although this was an exercise to evaluate structural first responseactions lAW the NFPA standards, the fire department carried it well beyond theminimum requirements and involved communication techniques, accountabilityand other fire ground duties.2.1.2 The first responding vehicle reported that there is smoke and flames showingfrom the building. The actual wind direction and temperature was to be used.2.1.3 All aspects of structural fire fighting such as, but not limited to, catching thehydrant, laying the appropriate amount of supply line, deploying handlines andbackup lines, proper sequences of charging the lines with water, nozzle pressures,and pump operations were well demonstrated and executed within the requiredtime constants ofthree minutes.2.1.4 The hydrant used for this exercise was leaking below the surface indicating thehydrant was not properly opened to the full extent or the hydrant is in need ofrepair. If freezing is not a factor, recommend if the hydrant needs to be replacedit should be replaced with a wet-barrel type hydrant. This is suggested forhydrants that need replacing to be replaced with the wet-barrel instead of the drybarrel type. (Action required)3.0. Structural Fire Exercise. On 11 Mar 04, approximately 0815, a structural fire andrescue exercise was provided at bldg. 810. The exercise was used to measure the initialattack capability of the fire department's first responding units and personnel forperformance. The scenario was an explosion on the roofs second HVAC unit resultingin fire and smoke coming from the roof and one worker unaccounted for. A critiquedwas held on site upon termination of the exercise.Attachment 5
Page 1 and 2: RECORD REPRODUCTION COVER SHEETThe
Page 3 and 4: TRIP REPORT1. PERSONS MAKING THIS T
Page 5 and 6: ATTACHMENTS:I. Normal Maintenance R
Page 7 and 8: d. Building 811 A walk-through of t
Page 9 and 10: ii. Exterior wall is damaged and bi
Page 11 and 12: Photo 3Building 833 Damaged WallPho
Page 13 and 14: 4. FACILITY REVIEW OBSERVATIONSThe
Page 15 and 16: 4.4.2. Building 80 I, room G 1315.
Page 17 and 18: Air Force Plant 44 Facilities Revie
Page 19 and 20: 3.17 Finding 04-17. Bldg 830. Cinci
Page 21: The audit followed an audit protoco
Page 25 and 26: local standards and procedures and
Page 27 and 28: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution a
Page 37 and 38: •FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistributio
Page 73 and 74:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution a
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
•FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistributio
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 106 and 107:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYTRIP REPORT1.
Page 108 and 109:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY8. IMPACT ON A
Page 110 and 111:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYc. Building 81
Page 112 and 113:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYbb. Building 8
Page 114 and 115:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYThe review fol
Page 116 and 117:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY3.0. Structura
Page 118 and 119:
-_._-----~-,FOR F Ie N3.1. I I. Acc
Page 120 and 121:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY4.0 Any questi
Page 122 and 123:
For Official Use Onlysprinkler cove
Page 124 and 125:
,TRIP REPORTl. PERSONS MAKING THIS
Page 126:
g. Equipment Issues1) The Raytheon
show all

Plant 44 Audit Reports - Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?