Plant 44 Audit Reports - Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6. SUMMARYThe plant looks good from an overall fire protection standpoint. The fire departmentcontinues to do a good job of managing the fire protection program. Most ofthe itemsidentified can easily be corrected; others will have to be budget for. Continued review byfire protection personnel of all projects regardless of importance or time constraints willresult in fewer costly changes later on. Locating the fire prevention officers with thefacility folks should help with the coordination process.DAVE DICKSONFire Protection EngineerROMEARENGOFire Protection EngineerAttachment 2
Air Force Plant 44 Facilities ReviewTUCSON, ArizonaRaytheon Missile Systems Company8 - 11 March 2004Industrial Safety Evaluation1.0 OVERVIEW: The annual ASC/EMV Industrial Facilities Review of the RaytheonMissile Systems Company (RMSC), Air Force Plant 44, Tucson, Arizona, was conducted8 - II Mar 2004. Mr Bill Kapella, ASC, DET I/SE, on behalf of ASC/ENV, performedthe Industrial Safety evaluation. Mr. Richard Force, RMSC Safety, accompanied Mr.Kapella. The purpose of the review was to conduct an examination of the RMSCresponsible facilities/workplaces and evaluate the Occupational Safety Programadministration and its effectiveness. Due to the time constraints, it was not intended toperform a thorough examination of the facilities visited; therefore, all hazards and/ordeficiencies that may exist within the work place may not be identified.2.0 PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS: After visual inspection from the 2002 report onlyone finding is a repeat violation from the 2002 inspection and is stated below.2.0.1 2003 Finding 1. Bldg 801 Storage room southside kitchen. Housekeeping/storage ofmaterial with 18" ofsprinkler.3.0 FACILITY OBSERVATIONS (2004): The following discrepancies were notedduring the walk through of the plant. Also during this inspection several discrepanciesthat were noted were corrected either on the spot or were called into the plant's facilitiesteam and were abated prior to the completion of this inspection.3.1 Finding 04-01. General Finding. Lightning Protection: Several faci lities thatwere protected with lighting protection have discrepancies associated with the airterminal, down cable, metallic material higher than air terminals, and/or side arcinghazard potential. Example:3.1.1 bldg 849 has roof stairs taller than surrounding air terminals and down wirespainted,3.1.2 bldg 827C has a newly installed exhaust/vent system and associated tie downcable higher the surrounding air terminals,3.1.3 bldg 827A has the down wires painted,3.1.4 bldg 855 has down wires painted and has metal conduit in the close proximity ofthe down wire causing a side arc hazard,3.1.5 bldg 864 has down wires painted.Recommend checking the PM card to ensure the above discrepancies are listed as amandatory check for all lightning protection PMs on all facilities equipped with lightningprotection.Attachment 3
Page 1 and 2: RECORD REPRODUCTION COVER SHEETThe
Page 3 and 4: TRIP REPORT1. PERSONS MAKING THIS T
Page 5 and 6: ATTACHMENTS:I. Normal Maintenance R
Page 7 and 8: d. Building 811 A walk-through of t
Page 9 and 10: ii. Exterior wall is damaged and bi
Page 11 and 12: Photo 3Building 833 Damaged WallPho
Page 13 and 14: 4. FACILITY REVIEW OBSERVATIONSThe
Page 15: 4.4.2. Building 80 I, room G 1315.
Page 19 and 20: 3.17 Finding 04-17. Bldg 830. Cinci
Page 21 and 22: The audit followed an audit protoco
Page 23 and 24: AFP 44 ANNUAL FACILITIES REVIEW8 -
Page 25 and 26: local standards and procedures and
Page 27 and 28: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution a
Page 37 and 38: •FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistributio
Page 67 and 68:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution a
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
•FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistributio
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 106 and 107:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYTRIP REPORT1.
Page 108 and 109:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY8. IMPACT ON A
Page 110 and 111:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYc. Building 81
Page 112 and 113:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYbb. Building 8
Page 114 and 115:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYThe review fol
Page 116 and 117:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY3.0. Structura
Page 118 and 119:
-_._-----~-,FOR F Ie N3.1. I I. Acc
Page 120 and 121:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY4.0 Any questi
Page 122 and 123:
For Official Use Onlysprinkler cove
Page 124 and 125:
,TRIP REPORTl. PERSONS MAKING THIS
Page 126:
g. Equipment Issues1) The Raytheon
show all

Plant 44 Audit Reports - Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?