Plant 44 Audit Reports - Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

More documents

Recommendations

Info

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution authorized to DoD components and their contractors only; administrative/operationaluse; August 8, 2005. Other requests for this document shall be referred to the Chief, AcquisitionEnvironmental Safety & Health Division, Engineering Directorate, ASC/ENV, Wright Patterson AirForce Base, OH 45433CC. Building 864 A walk-through of the building was accomplished. The followingfacility housekeeping and maintenance discrepancies were noted:i. A temperature and humidity sensor mounted on the wall in the test bay is nolonger used and needs to be removed.ii. The exterior exit door in the chemical lab was blocked on the outside by aporta-john.iii. The lab is constructed as a class I, division I room, however the computersare located on the floor. If this is a class I, division I area then the computers need to beinstalled in another location above the floor.IV. The wall-roofjoint on the fuel pump house is badly cracked and needs to berepaired.dd. Building 865 A walk-through of the building was accomplished. Building 865is a small building (280 SF) built in 1975 and utilized for TOW testing. In 2002 thisbuilding was found to have numerous discrepancies caused by a lack of normalmaintenance. The necessary maintenance work has been completed and this facility isgreatly improved.i. Temporary test equipment located outdoors in the test range area was poweredwith multiple extension cords and power strips. This is an inadequate method to provideelectrical power. This setup needs to be replaced with a hardwired, weather proofelectrical outlet.ii. The occupant pointed out that the FACO public address system does not reachbuilding 865 or the associated test range.ee. Building 866 A walk-through ofthe building was accomplished. Damagedsiding along the ramp needs to be repaired.ff. Building 867 A walk-through ofthe building was accomplished. Nohousekeeping or maintenance discrepancies were noted.gg. Building 868 A walk-through ofthe building was accomplished. The followingfacility housekeeping and maintenance discrepancies were noted:i. The evaporative cooler R85E027 is badly corroded around the base of theunit. If necessary, repair or replacement of this unit should be considered for futureconsideration as a "other than normal maintenance" CTR project.ii. Asphalt paving around the building needs to be maintained with crack repairsand seal coating.iii. The eyewash unit outside the loading dock has a broken foot pedal.iv. Housekeeping attention is required in the electrical equipment room (868-2).Debris, old heat detectors, conduit and other junk needs to be removed.v. A new modular office unit has been requested for installation at building 868.An explosive site plan has been submitted for approval; the approval has not yet beengranted. It was observed that trenching for the utility services has already been startedwithout the necessary approvalS.Attachment 1
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution authorized to DoD components and their contractors only; administrative/operationaluse; August 8, 2005. Other requests for this document shall be referred to the Chief, AcquisitionEnvironmental Safety & Health Division, Engineering Directorate, ASC/ENV, Wright Patterson AirForce Base, OH 45433hh. Building 870 A walk-through of the building was accomplished. Nohousekeeping or maintenance discrepancies were noted.4. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NORMAL MAINTENANCE PLAN: It isevident that Raytheon is doing an adequate job of maintaining the plant. The softwarepackage, FAMIS, which was procured to handle the maintenance planning functions, hasbeen replaced with a new system called "Prism" by SAP.5. CONCLUSION: Raytheon's responsiveness in correcting deficiencies identifiedduring this visit was helpful in ensuring that the review was successful. In many casesthe deficiencies were corrected on the spot, or within 24 hours of the finding. Correctiveactions on all the special Facilities Review Work Orders that were called in during thefacility review were promptly acted upon.RICHARD A. SPOTTSAFP 44 Supervising EngineerAcquisition Environmental, Safety& Health Division, Engineering DirectorateAttachment 1
Page 1 and 2: RECORD REPRODUCTION COVER SHEETThe
Page 3 and 4: TRIP REPORT1. PERSONS MAKING THIS T
Page 5 and 6: ATTACHMENTS:I. Normal Maintenance R
Page 7 and 8: d. Building 811 A walk-through of t
Page 9 and 10: ii. Exterior wall is damaged and bi
Page 11 and 12: Photo 3Building 833 Damaged WallPho
Page 13 and 14: 4. FACILITY REVIEW OBSERVATIONSThe
Page 15 and 16: 4.4.2. Building 80 I, room G 1315.
Page 17 and 18: Air Force Plant 44 Facilities Revie
Page 19 and 20: 3.17 Finding 04-17. Bldg 830. Cinci
Page 21 and 22: The audit followed an audit protoco
Page 23 and 24: AFP 44 ANNUAL FACILITIES REVIEW8 -
Page 25 and 26: local standards and procedures and
Page 27 and 28: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution a
Page 33: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution a
Page 37 and 38: •FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistributio
Page 85 and 86:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistribution a
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
•FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYDistributio
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 106 and 107:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYTRIP REPORT1.
Page 108 and 109:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY8. IMPACT ON A
Page 110 and 111:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYc. Building 81
Page 112 and 113:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYbb. Building 8
Page 114 and 115:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYThe review fol
Page 116 and 117:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY3.0. Structura
Page 118 and 119:
-_._-----~-,FOR F Ie N3.1. I I. Acc
Page 120 and 121:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY4.0 Any questi
Page 122 and 123:
For Official Use Onlysprinkler cove
Page 124 and 125:
,TRIP REPORTl. PERSONS MAKING THIS
Page 126:
g. Equipment Issues1) The Raytheon
show all

Plant 44 Audit Reports - Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?