Hurstville REF - Transport for NSW - NSW Government

Principle 3: Health standards for exposure to radio emissions will be met.Principle(a) A telecommunications facility must bedesigned, installed and operated so that themaximum human exposure levels toradiofrequency emissions comply withRadiation Protection Standard.(b) An EME Environmental Report shall beproduced by the proponent of developmentto which the Mobile Phone Network Codeapplies in terms of design, siting of facilitiesand notifications.The Report is to be in the format required bythe Australian Radiation Protection NuclearSafety Agency (ARPANSA). It is to show thepredicted levels of electromagnetic energysurrounding the development comply withthe safety limits imposed by the AustralianCommunications and Media Authority andthe Electromagnetic Radiation Standard, anddemonstrate compliance with the MobilePhone Networks Code.ProposalThe proposed facility will comply with theARPANSA standard in relation to humanexposure to EME. An EME report has beencompleted and is found at Appendix 4.This report demonstrates compliance with theARPANSA standard for the operation of a radiocommunications facility in Australia.The proposal is not for a mobile phone networkand is not subject to the Code for theDevelopment of Mobile Phone NetworkInfrastructure commonly known as the ACIFCode.An EME report has been completed and isfound at Appendix 4.Principle 4: Minimise disturbance and risk, and maximise compliancePrinciple(a) The siting and height oftelecommunications facility must comply withrelevant site and height requirements specifiedby the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 and theAirports (Protection of Airspace) Regulations1996 of the Commonwealth. It must notpenetrate obstacle limitation surface shown onrelevant Obstacle Limitation Surface Plan thathas been prepared by the operator of anProposalThe provisions of the Civil AviationRegulations 1988 and the Airports (Protectionof Airspace) Regulations 1996 wereconsidered during the design and sitingprocess. There is no need for the installationof a warning light or aircraft navigation light, asthe proposal does not penetrate the ObstacleLimitation Surface.Page 69 of 75