Jim Marrs - PSI Spies - Amazon S3

182PSI SpiesI certainly didn’t discuss it with very many peoplebecause I was new and things were classified at thattime. Most of the people I worked with didn’t evenhave the clearances to know about it, even if theywanted to. And most of the people I worked with in theNavy were pretty conservative. There were evenfewer open-minded people elsewhere. I think theAir Force had even less. I think the Army had themost open-minded people. They had a somewhatpragmatic approach. They said, “Well, I don’tknow if that works, but if it works, then we need to bestudying it.”We got every view across the spectrum, from “It’sall hogwash,” to “It’s the end-all.” But actually therewere very few at the “end-all” end. The majority wereat the skeptical level.And I’d like to say that I’m a skeptic about a lot ofthings, but most people who claim to be skeptics arereally biased against something. They’re not realskeptics. Skeptics say “I don’t know, but I’ll look at it.”Ingo Swann also was at a loss to explain the mechanicsof remote viewing. “I never did dwell on that because mymandate was to provide a useful tool, not to explain it,” Swannsaid. Pressed for his theory, he said, “It’s obvious that at somesubconscious level we are all connected to the universe andeverything in it. But since we did not need to explain how thiscould be done, only that it could be done and that peoplecould do it for some profitable purpose, that’s all we neededto know.”