12.07.2015 Views

AQIP 2007 Systems Portfolio - San Juan College

AQIP 2007 Systems Portfolio - San Juan College

AQIP 2007 Systems Portfolio - San Juan College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>College</strong> – <strong>AQIP</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong>- November <strong>2007</strong>Community InputNeed to provide basic skills training for the workforceDo more technical education career paths for high school studentsDevelop more specialized programs with local business and industryEnhance communication with middle and high school studentsBuild a closer relationship with Dine <strong>College</strong> (tribal college)Do more outreach to smaller communitiesExpand health occupationsNeed to extend current offering of four year programsNeed to extend current offerings of evening classes at off campus locationsNeed to extend current offerings of online classesProvide better disability information, access, servicesTable 5.7 Community Input into the Strategic PlanStrategic DirectiveValue Information and Market RealitiesValue Information and Market RealitiesValue Information and Market RealitiesValue PartnershipsValue PartnershipsValue PartnershipsValue PartnershipsValue Educational Access and Student SuccessValue Educational Access and Student SuccessValue Educational Access and Student SuccessValue Educational Access and Student Success5R2 The PACE survey is a nationally normedinstrument that was used for the first time in <strong>2007</strong>,therefore comparisons with the previous in-houseclimate survey are dubious. Use of a nationallynormed instrument permits the <strong>College</strong> to assess itsresults in comparison to other institutions.Figure 5.1 indicates that <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>College</strong> deviatesmost dramatically from the national norm onInstitutional Structure, with a score of 3.01, comparedto 3.26 (on a scale of 1 to 5). <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>College</strong> waslower on two domains than the national norm base(Supervisory Relationships and InstitutionalStructure), the same on one (Teamwork) and higheron Student Focus (Table 5.2).Specifically of most concern, however, is the meanscore of Institutional Structure as rated by functionalrole. The graph Figure 5.3 below indicates that facultyrate this domain as the lowest, falling into theCompetitive style.CollaborativeConsultative543Mean Scores of the Institutional Structure Climate Factoras Rated by Functional Roles at <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>College</strong>Support StaffFacultyProfessional StaffThe graph below Figure 5.3 details the mean climatescore as rated by employees’ functional role.Competitive2CollaborativeConsultative54<strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>College</strong> Climate Compared with the NILIE PACE Norm BaseCoercive11 4 5 6 10 11 15 16 22 25 29 32 38 41 44Figure 5.2Mean Climate Scores as Rated by Functional Roles at <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>College</strong>.5Collaborative3CompetitiveCoercive21SupervisoryRelationshipInstitutionalStructure<strong>2007</strong> PACENorm BaseTeamwork Student Focus OverallConsultativeCompetitive432Support StaffFacultyProfessional StaffFigure 5.1Coercive1Figure 5.3SupervisoryResponsibilityInstitutionalSt ruct ureTeamwork Student Focus Overall<strong>AQIP</strong> Category Five: Leading and Communicating 52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!