12.07.2015 Views

AQIP 2007 Systems Portfolio - San Juan College

AQIP 2007 Systems Portfolio - San Juan College

AQIP 2007 Systems Portfolio - San Juan College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>College</strong> – <strong>AQIP</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> – November <strong>2007</strong>In a time of budget concerns, it will berecommended that the building of partnershipsreceive a high priority in the planning andbudgeting process. The ability to leverage dollarsthrough partnering will be of particular importanceas the <strong>College</strong> closely monitors its expenditures.• Communicating resultsA formal process for communicating results andimprovement priorities to relationship partners,faculty, staff, administrators and appropriatestudents and stockholders will be developed thisyear. Currently that information is sharedthrough regular communication channels (see5C1, 5P5, 5P6, 8P3).• Benchmarking other institutions:A Key Task team will be created to identify datasources or partnership statistics that should bemaintained centrally and shared withstakeholders. This team will also benchmarkother institutions that excel in collaborativerelationships and develop a means to begincomparing results of those institutions with thoseachieved at SJC.indicates that the CLC is progressing positivelytowards each target:Benchmark Target 2006-<strong>2007</strong>15-20 Spring I – 14.3Spring II – 11.8Summer Adult – 28.1Summer Kids – 11.5AverageparticipantsOperating margin 40-50% Spring I – 55%Spring II – 64%Summer Adult – 55%Summer Kids – 51%Cancellation Rate 5-20% Spring I – 20%Spring II – 15%Summer Adult – 30%Summer Kids – 10%New Programs 20% Spring I – 62%Spring II – 48%Summer Adult – 12%Summer Kids – 49%Table 9.7 CLC Data 2006-<strong>2007</strong>LERN recommended the following CLC benchmarksbe tracked and analyzed (Tables 9.5 and 9:6):Benchmark Target PresentAverage15-20 8participantsOperating margin 40-50% 40%Repeat rate 50-70% 25%Cancellation rateoverall5-20%30-50%39%N/ANew coursecancellation ratePromotion costs 10-15% 19%Production costs Less than 50% 50%Staff productivity $125,000+ $150,000Brochure:Less than 100:1 26:1Participant ratioNew programs 20% 25%Programmer6-20 X salary N/AincomePercentage of Less than 3%N/Amoney refundedTable 9. 5 CLC TargetsIn addition, because the CLC’s repeat rate is low, thefollowing retention benchmarks should be tracked:Retention Benchmark Target PresentService rating 4+ out of 5 TBDQuality rating 4+ out of 5 TBDCourses/events per 1.5 -2 N/ApersonIncome per person 2 to 3 xN/Aave. feeAverage size of Less than 5 N/Acancelled course/eventCost of new customers 4:1 or less N/ATable 9.6 CLC Retention TargetsThe CLC has focused on improving averageparticipants, operating margin, cancellation rate andnew programs benchmarks. Data (Table 9. 7)<strong>AQIP</strong> Category Nine: Building Collaborative Relationships83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!