02.12.2012 Views

Applications of state space models in finance

Applications of state space models in finance

Applications of state space models in finance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

94 6 Time-vary<strong>in</strong>g market beta risk <strong>of</strong> pan-European sectors<br />

cannot be estimated by a direct application <strong>of</strong> standard maximum likelihood techniques.<br />

As outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> ¢ 5.2.2, several procedures for estimat<strong>in</strong>g SV <strong>models</strong> have been proposed.<br />

These <strong>in</strong>clude method <strong>of</strong> moments and QML estimators, Bayesian approaches based on<br />

MCMC techniques, the MCL estimator and the efficient MCL procedure. A consensus<br />

on how to estimate SV <strong>models</strong> is still miss<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

As outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> ¢ 5.2.3, <strong>in</strong> this thesis SV <strong>models</strong> are estimated via efficient MCL us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

importance sampl<strong>in</strong>g techniques. Recall<strong>in</strong>g the MSV model <strong>in</strong> (5.68) time-vary<strong>in</strong>g sector<br />

betas can be constructed as<br />

ˆβ SV<br />

i,t = ρ0i<br />

� hii,t<br />

� . (6.14)<br />

h00,t<br />

In contrast to the GARCH based conditional betas def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> (6.10) smoothed rather<br />

than filtered estimates <strong>of</strong> the conditional variance series <strong>of</strong> market and sector returns,<br />

h00,t and hii,t, are employed. All the available <strong>in</strong>formation up to and <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g date T<br />

can be relied upon for <strong>in</strong>-sample analysis purposes.<br />

A summary <strong>of</strong> the estimation results <strong>of</strong> the considered univariate SV <strong>models</strong> for European<br />

sectors over the full sample period is given <strong>in</strong> Table 6.5. The asymmetric 95%<br />

confidence <strong>in</strong>tervals for the persistence parameter φi are generally narrow. This <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />

a high level <strong>of</strong> significance. The degree <strong>of</strong> volatility persistence ranges from a low<br />

for Travel & Leisure, to the highest level for Technology and Telecommunications. This<br />

compares well to the GARCH results. For the two other parameters, σ2 ηi and σ2 ∗i , both<br />

the asymmetric confidence <strong>in</strong>tervals as well as the range <strong>of</strong> parameter estimates across<br />

sectors, are wider. For the sectors Retail, Travel & Leisure and Utilities, the comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

<strong>of</strong> a low persistence parameter and a high value for σ2 ηi , which measures the variation <strong>of</strong><br />

the volatility process, implies that the process <strong>of</strong> volatility is less predictable for these<br />

three sectors. The highest levels <strong>of</strong> volatility, as <strong>in</strong>dicated by a high scal<strong>in</strong>g parameter<br />

σ2 ∗i , are found for Automobiles & Parts and the three sectors Telecommunications, Media<br />

and Technology (TMT). This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g broadly corresponds to the calculated standard<br />

deviations <strong>of</strong> weekly returns <strong>in</strong> Table 2.2. Notably, the null <strong>of</strong> normality cannot be rejected<br />

at the 5% level for seven sectors. Compared to the GARCH <strong>models</strong> estimated <strong>in</strong><br />

the previous subsection, the estimated Jarque-Bera test statistics are significantly lower<br />

for all sectors and also for the overall market. The reported Q-statistics <strong>in</strong>dicate some<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> autocorrelation at the 5% level for five sectors as well as the market <strong>in</strong>dex.<br />

Figure 6.1 allows for a comparison <strong>of</strong> conditional volatility estimates based on a t-<br />

GARCH(1,1) and a SV model. The graph displays the filtered and smoothed conditional<br />

volatility estimates for the Telecommunications sector. Overall, the filtered conditional<br />

volatility series show a very similar pattern. The range <strong>of</strong> the GARCH based series<br />

is greater than <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> its SV counterpart. The smoothed estimate, which — per<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ition — takes the full set <strong>of</strong> observations <strong>in</strong>to account, reveals that both filtered<br />

series tend to over<strong>state</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> volatility.<br />

6.2.3 Kalman filter based approaches<br />

In contrast to volatility-based techniques, where the conditional beta series can only be<br />

constructed <strong>in</strong>directly after the conditional variances <strong>of</strong> the market and sector i have

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!