Applications of state space models in finance
Applications of state space models in finance
Applications of state space models in finance
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 1<br />
Introduction<br />
“Economists study the economy both for the sheer <strong>in</strong>tellectual<br />
pleasure <strong>of</strong> try<strong>in</strong>g to understand the world <strong>in</strong> which they live<br />
and with the hope that improved knowledge will lead to better<br />
economic policy and performance.”<br />
Blanchard and Fischer (1989, p. 614)<br />
A central conception <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ance is the generally accepted trade-<strong>of</strong>f between risk and expected<br />
return. The assessment <strong>of</strong> risk and the required risk premium is usually modeled<br />
by an asset pric<strong>in</strong>g model, <strong>in</strong> which the common variation <strong>in</strong> returns is accounted for by<br />
a possibly multivariate set <strong>of</strong> risk factors. The first and still widely used pric<strong>in</strong>g model<br />
is the s<strong>in</strong>gle-factor Capital Asset Pric<strong>in</strong>g Model (CAPM), proposed by Sharpe (1964)<br />
and L<strong>in</strong>tner (1965). It implies a l<strong>in</strong>ear relationship between an asset’s expected return<br />
and its systematic risk, also referred to as beta. 1 In test<strong>in</strong>g the validity <strong>of</strong> the static<br />
CAPM, various studies have demonstrated the possibility to earn risk-adjusted excess<br />
returns by form<strong>in</strong>g portfolios accord<strong>in</strong>g to fundamental attributes, such as firm size or<br />
valuation. These market anomalies, so-called because the abnormal returns related to<br />
these patterns cannot be expla<strong>in</strong>ed under the CAPM, motivate the alternative use <strong>of</strong><br />
pric<strong>in</strong>g <strong>models</strong> that allow for multiple sources <strong>of</strong> risk. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the choice <strong>of</strong> variables,<br />
important variants <strong>in</strong>clude fundamental and macroeconomic multifactor <strong>models</strong>.<br />
Irrespective <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> considered systematic factors, all <strong>of</strong> these pric<strong>in</strong>g <strong>models</strong><br />
share one common property: <strong>in</strong> their basic representation, the beta coefficients are<br />
assumed to be constant over time.<br />
In an <strong>in</strong>herently dynamic world that is characterized by chang<strong>in</strong>g relationships between<br />
economic agents over time (cf. Chow 1984) the paradigm <strong>of</strong> beta constancy has<br />
to be questioned. Given theoretical arguments and empirical stylized facts <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />
return series, the true degree <strong>of</strong> beta can be assumed to depend on the available <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
at any given date. This thesis addresses the explicit model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> time-vary<strong>in</strong>g<br />
1 As the focus <strong>of</strong> this thesis is on the econometric model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> time-vary<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ancial sensitivities<br />
and not on portfolio theory, it is not <strong>in</strong>tended to provide a comprehensive derivation <strong>of</strong><br />
factor pric<strong>in</strong>g <strong>models</strong> and their assumptions. For a summary <strong>of</strong> the basic foundations <strong>of</strong> asset<br />
pric<strong>in</strong>g theory and further references, see Appendix A.