02.12.2012 Views

Applications of state space models in finance

Applications of state space models in finance

Applications of state space models in finance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 1<br />

Introduction<br />

“Economists study the economy both for the sheer <strong>in</strong>tellectual<br />

pleasure <strong>of</strong> try<strong>in</strong>g to understand the world <strong>in</strong> which they live<br />

and with the hope that improved knowledge will lead to better<br />

economic policy and performance.”<br />

Blanchard and Fischer (1989, p. 614)<br />

A central conception <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ance is the generally accepted trade-<strong>of</strong>f between risk and expected<br />

return. The assessment <strong>of</strong> risk and the required risk premium is usually modeled<br />

by an asset pric<strong>in</strong>g model, <strong>in</strong> which the common variation <strong>in</strong> returns is accounted for by<br />

a possibly multivariate set <strong>of</strong> risk factors. The first and still widely used pric<strong>in</strong>g model<br />

is the s<strong>in</strong>gle-factor Capital Asset Pric<strong>in</strong>g Model (CAPM), proposed by Sharpe (1964)<br />

and L<strong>in</strong>tner (1965). It implies a l<strong>in</strong>ear relationship between an asset’s expected return<br />

and its systematic risk, also referred to as beta. 1 In test<strong>in</strong>g the validity <strong>of</strong> the static<br />

CAPM, various studies have demonstrated the possibility to earn risk-adjusted excess<br />

returns by form<strong>in</strong>g portfolios accord<strong>in</strong>g to fundamental attributes, such as firm size or<br />

valuation. These market anomalies, so-called because the abnormal returns related to<br />

these patterns cannot be expla<strong>in</strong>ed under the CAPM, motivate the alternative use <strong>of</strong><br />

pric<strong>in</strong>g <strong>models</strong> that allow for multiple sources <strong>of</strong> risk. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the choice <strong>of</strong> variables,<br />

important variants <strong>in</strong>clude fundamental and macroeconomic multifactor <strong>models</strong>.<br />

Irrespective <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> considered systematic factors, all <strong>of</strong> these pric<strong>in</strong>g <strong>models</strong><br />

share one common property: <strong>in</strong> their basic representation, the beta coefficients are<br />

assumed to be constant over time.<br />

In an <strong>in</strong>herently dynamic world that is characterized by chang<strong>in</strong>g relationships between<br />

economic agents over time (cf. Chow 1984) the paradigm <strong>of</strong> beta constancy has<br />

to be questioned. Given theoretical arguments and empirical stylized facts <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

return series, the true degree <strong>of</strong> beta can be assumed to depend on the available <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

at any given date. This thesis addresses the explicit model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> time-vary<strong>in</strong>g<br />

1 As the focus <strong>of</strong> this thesis is on the econometric model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> time-vary<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ancial sensitivities<br />

and not on portfolio theory, it is not <strong>in</strong>tended to provide a comprehensive derivation <strong>of</strong><br />

factor pric<strong>in</strong>g <strong>models</strong> and their assumptions. For a summary <strong>of</strong> the basic foundations <strong>of</strong> asset<br />

pric<strong>in</strong>g theory and further references, see Appendix A.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!