02.12.2012 Views

Applications of state space models in finance

Applications of state space models in finance

Applications of state space models in finance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 4<br />

Markov regime switch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Markov switch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>models</strong> <strong>of</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g regimes are latent variable time series <strong>models</strong>.<br />

The observation-generat<strong>in</strong>g distribution depends on an unobserved, or hidden, <strong>state</strong><br />

variable modeled as a Markov cha<strong>in</strong>. Markov switch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>models</strong>, also commonly known<br />

as hidden Markov <strong>models</strong> (HMMs), <strong>of</strong>fer a high degree <strong>of</strong> flexibility and can be employed<br />

for both univariate and multivariate series. A hidden Markov model represents a special<br />

class <strong>of</strong> dependent mixtures and consists <strong>of</strong> two processes: an unobservable m-<strong>state</strong><br />

Markov cha<strong>in</strong> that determ<strong>in</strong>es the <strong>state</strong>, or regime, and a <strong>state</strong>-dependent process <strong>of</strong><br />

observations. The hidden Markov model is closely related to the general l<strong>in</strong>ear Gaussian<br />

<strong>state</strong> <strong>space</strong> model <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> Chapter 3. Both <strong>models</strong> are <strong>state</strong> <strong>space</strong> <strong>models</strong>. The<br />

major difference is that HMMs have discrete <strong>state</strong>s, while the Kalman filter based <strong>state</strong><br />

<strong>space</strong> approach deals with unobserved cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>state</strong>s. 9<br />

While HMMs have been employed by eng<strong>in</strong>eers <strong>in</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> signal-process<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

over the last two decades extensive literature developed <strong>in</strong> automatic speech recognition,<br />

biosciences, image process<strong>in</strong>g and climatology, among others. Important references <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

Baum and Petrie (1966), the tutorial by Rab<strong>in</strong>er (1989) and Ephraim and Merhav<br />

(2002). Economic and f<strong>in</strong>ancial researchers are also frequently confronted with time<br />

series that experience changes <strong>in</strong> regime that are evoked by third factors. The shifts are<br />

not observed directly, and usually it is unknwown which regime currently prevails. However,<br />

it was not until the sem<strong>in</strong>al works <strong>of</strong> Hamilton (1988, 1989, 1990) that economists<br />

and f<strong>in</strong>ancial econometricians started to apply HMMs. Hamilton <strong>in</strong>troduced a homogeneous<br />

Markov switch<strong>in</strong>g vector autoregressive model, <strong>in</strong> which the latent <strong>state</strong> process is<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent from exogenous variables. Lahiri and Wang (1996) studied the comparative<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> various <strong>in</strong>terest rate spreads as lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicators for turn<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>of</strong><br />

the U.S. bus<strong>in</strong>ess cycle. They assumed the U.S. economy to shift between two <strong>state</strong>s<br />

with the shift between regimes be<strong>in</strong>g governed by a two-<strong>state</strong> Markov process. Fridman<br />

(1994) proposed a two-<strong>state</strong> CAPM where the <strong>state</strong>s represent two market regimes<br />

<strong>of</strong> high and low volatility. The parameters are determ<strong>in</strong>ed by an unobserved Markov<br />

cha<strong>in</strong>. Another well-known application to f<strong>in</strong>ance is conducted by Rydén et al. (1998)<br />

9 For a review <strong>of</strong> the common properties <strong>of</strong> both concepts, see Roweis and Ghahramani<br />

(1999).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!