02.12.2012 Views

Applications of state space models in finance

Applications of state space models in finance

Applications of state space models in finance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.5 Introduction <strong>of</strong> explanatory variables 35<br />

coefficients over time can be described as a random walk (RW):<br />

ξ t+1 = ξ t + Rη t. (3.77)<br />

The random walk is considered an essential scientific concept <strong>in</strong> the analysis <strong>of</strong> dynamics<br />

across many discipl<strong>in</strong>es. It had already been widely established <strong>in</strong> the natural sciences<br />

when Samuelson (1965) <strong>in</strong>troduced it to f<strong>in</strong>ance. Today, the random walk represents<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the most important ideas <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial economics.<br />

An illustrative example <strong>of</strong> the applicability <strong>of</strong> random walks to economics is the timevary<strong>in</strong>g<br />

parameter model for U.S. monetary growth presented by Kim and Nelson (1989).<br />

Excellent surveys <strong>of</strong> the random walk and its l<strong>in</strong>k to f<strong>in</strong>ancial markets and security prices<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude Campbell et al. (1997, ¢ 2) and Lo and MacK<strong>in</strong>lay (1999).<br />

3.5.2.3 The mean revert<strong>in</strong>g model<br />

Another important time-vary<strong>in</strong>g coefficient model is the mean revert<strong>in</strong>g (MR) model,<br />

proposed by Rosenberg (1973). The regression coefficients are modeled as a stationary<br />

process:<br />

ξ t+1 − ¯ ξ = T (ξ t − ¯ ξ) + Rη t, (3.78)<br />

where ξ t is a vector <strong>of</strong> stochastic parameters with non-stochastic mean ¯ ξ <strong>in</strong> stochastic<br />

equilibrium. For values <strong>of</strong> the roots <strong>of</strong> T <strong>in</strong>side the unit circle, stationarity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stochastic process is guaranteed and the coefficients move around the constant mean ¯ ξ.<br />

The parameters to be estimated are ¯ ξ, T , Q and h. Follow<strong>in</strong>g Coll<strong>in</strong>s et al. (1987) it is<br />

assumed a priori that the major determ<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>of</strong> any time-vary<strong>in</strong>g regression coefficients<br />

change only gradually over time. To assure smoothly develop<strong>in</strong>g coefficients from period<br />

to period, the diagonal elements <strong>of</strong> T are restricted to values between zero and unity. For<br />

T = I, Equation (3.78) reduces to a random walk. For T = 0, the model is equivalent<br />

to the random coefficient model.<br />

The <strong>state</strong> equation <strong>of</strong> the mean revert<strong>in</strong>g model differs from the general <strong>state</strong> equation<br />

<strong>in</strong> (3.74) by the <strong>in</strong>corporation <strong>of</strong> the parameter ¯ ξ. Substitution <strong>of</strong> (3.78) <strong>in</strong>to (3.73)<br />

br<strong>in</strong>gs the mean revert<strong>in</strong>g model <strong>in</strong>to the same form as (3.70)–(3.71):<br />

� ξ ∗ t+1<br />

¯ξ<br />

� � ∗<br />

ξt = T ¯ξ<br />

� ∗<br />

ξt ¯ξ<br />

yt = zt<br />

�<br />

+ Rη t, (3.79)<br />

�<br />

+ ɛt, (3.80)<br />

with ξ ∗ t = ξ t − ¯ ξ for all t (cf. Chow 1984). The diagonal elements <strong>of</strong> T that correspond to<br />

¯ξ are equal to unity. As ¯ ξ is constant over time, the lower part <strong>of</strong> η t is set to zero. In this<br />

representation, the <strong>state</strong> vector conta<strong>in</strong>s both time-vary<strong>in</strong>g as well as fixed regression<br />

coefficients and can be estimated by the standard Kalman filter.<br />

In the literature, the mean revert<strong>in</strong>g model has been applied to the test<strong>in</strong>g and model<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> the time-variation <strong>of</strong> an asset’s systematic risk; see, for example, Bos and Newbold<br />

(1984), Wells (1996, ¢ 5.3) and Brooks et al. (1998).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!