Applications of state space models in finance
Applications of state space models in finance
Applications of state space models in finance
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
64 5 Conditional heteroskedasticity <strong>models</strong><br />
The SB test checks whether the squared current residual depends on the sign <strong>of</strong> lagged<br />
residuals. It is def<strong>in</strong>ed as the t-statistic for the coefficient β1 <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g regression:<br />
ɛ ∗2<br />
t = β0 + β1S − t−1 + ηt, (5.20)<br />
with ɛt := yt − µ and ɛ∗ t := ɛt/σ, where µ and σ refer to the unconditional first two<br />
moments <strong>of</strong> yt, the series to be considered. S − t−1 represents a dummy variable that<br />
takes the value <strong>of</strong> unity for negative ɛt and zero otherwise. Replac<strong>in</strong>g S − t−1 <strong>in</strong> (5.20) by<br />
S − t−1ɛ∗t−1 , or by S+ t−1ɛ∗t−1 with S+ t−1 = 1 − S− t−1 , leads to the NSB test and PSB test,<br />
respectively. They test whether the conditional volatility depends on the size <strong>of</strong> past<br />
negative or positive shocks. As the correspond<strong>in</strong>g test statistics are all t-ratios, they<br />
asymptotically follow the standard normal distribution.<br />
A general test for nonl<strong>in</strong>ear GARCH can be derived by conduct<strong>in</strong>g these tests jo<strong>in</strong>tly:<br />
ɛ ∗2<br />
t = β0 + β1S − t−1 + β2S − t−1 ɛ∗ t−1 + β3S + t−1 ɛ∗ t−1 + ηt, (5.21)<br />
where the null hypothesis is def<strong>in</strong>ed as H0 : β1 = β2 = β3 = 0. The test-statistic is equal<br />
to T times the R 2 from this regression. It asymptotically follows a χ 2 distribution with<br />
three degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom.<br />
5.1.3 Non-Gaussian conditional densities<br />
Even though GARCH <strong>models</strong> have thicker than normal tails, it is still possible that the<br />
kurtosis <strong>in</strong>duced by a GARCH model with conditional normal errors does not capture<br />
the leptokurtosis present <strong>in</strong> high-frequency f<strong>in</strong>ancial time series completely (cf. Bollerslev<br />
et al. 1994). If not taken explicitly <strong>in</strong>to account, this leads to a formally misspecified<br />
likelihood function. However, as long as E(zt|Ωt−1) = 0 and V ar(zt|Ωt−1) = 1, the<br />
future conditional variance does not depend on the distribution <strong>of</strong> zt. Under these circumstances,<br />
QML estimation still yields asymptotically valid volatility forecasts without<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g the distribution <strong>of</strong> zt fully specified (cf. Andersen et al. 2005).<br />
Alternatively, <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> rely<strong>in</strong>g on QML based procedures, fully efficient ML estimates<br />
can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by consider<strong>in</strong>g alternative distributions with fatter than normal tails<br />
for zt. The most common choice is to employ a standardized Student-t distribution with<br />
ν degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom as proposed by Bollerslev (1987). The t-distribution is symmetric<br />
around zero; the number <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g moments is restricted by ν. For the standard<br />
GARCH(1,1) model, the fourth moment <strong>of</strong> zt exists for ν > 4. It is given by<br />
Kz =<br />
3(ν − 2)<br />
. (5.22)<br />
ν − 4<br />
The value <strong>of</strong> Kz is greater than the normal value <strong>of</strong> three. This results <strong>in</strong> an unconditional<br />
kurtosis <strong>of</strong> ɛt that is also greater than <strong>in</strong> the normal case. The number <strong>of</strong> degrees<br />
<strong>of</strong> freedom is treated as an extra parameter and can be estimated together with the other<br />
model parameters. In case <strong>of</strong> the nonl<strong>in</strong>ear GJR-GARCH(1,1) model with zt ∼ t(ν) and<br />
ν ≥ 5, and Kɛ and Kz be<strong>in</strong>g def<strong>in</strong>ed as <strong>in</strong> (5.18) and (5.22), respectively, the fourth<br />
moment exists if (5.17) holds (cf. L<strong>in</strong>g and McAleer 2002).<br />
To account for the observed leptokurtosis, several other parametric distributions have<br />
been suggested. Examples <strong>in</strong>clude the normal-Poisson mixture distribution (Jorion 1988)