02.12.2012 Views

Applications of state space models in finance

Applications of state space models in finance

Applications of state space models in finance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

64 5 Conditional heteroskedasticity <strong>models</strong><br />

The SB test checks whether the squared current residual depends on the sign <strong>of</strong> lagged<br />

residuals. It is def<strong>in</strong>ed as the t-statistic for the coefficient β1 <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g regression:<br />

ɛ ∗2<br />

t = β0 + β1S − t−1 + ηt, (5.20)<br />

with ɛt := yt − µ and ɛ∗ t := ɛt/σ, where µ and σ refer to the unconditional first two<br />

moments <strong>of</strong> yt, the series to be considered. S − t−1 represents a dummy variable that<br />

takes the value <strong>of</strong> unity for negative ɛt and zero otherwise. Replac<strong>in</strong>g S − t−1 <strong>in</strong> (5.20) by<br />

S − t−1ɛ∗t−1 , or by S+ t−1ɛ∗t−1 with S+ t−1 = 1 − S− t−1 , leads to the NSB test and PSB test,<br />

respectively. They test whether the conditional volatility depends on the size <strong>of</strong> past<br />

negative or positive shocks. As the correspond<strong>in</strong>g test statistics are all t-ratios, they<br />

asymptotically follow the standard normal distribution.<br />

A general test for nonl<strong>in</strong>ear GARCH can be derived by conduct<strong>in</strong>g these tests jo<strong>in</strong>tly:<br />

ɛ ∗2<br />

t = β0 + β1S − t−1 + β2S − t−1 ɛ∗ t−1 + β3S + t−1 ɛ∗ t−1 + ηt, (5.21)<br />

where the null hypothesis is def<strong>in</strong>ed as H0 : β1 = β2 = β3 = 0. The test-statistic is equal<br />

to T times the R 2 from this regression. It asymptotically follows a χ 2 distribution with<br />

three degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom.<br />

5.1.3 Non-Gaussian conditional densities<br />

Even though GARCH <strong>models</strong> have thicker than normal tails, it is still possible that the<br />

kurtosis <strong>in</strong>duced by a GARCH model with conditional normal errors does not capture<br />

the leptokurtosis present <strong>in</strong> high-frequency f<strong>in</strong>ancial time series completely (cf. Bollerslev<br />

et al. 1994). If not taken explicitly <strong>in</strong>to account, this leads to a formally misspecified<br />

likelihood function. However, as long as E(zt|Ωt−1) = 0 and V ar(zt|Ωt−1) = 1, the<br />

future conditional variance does not depend on the distribution <strong>of</strong> zt. Under these circumstances,<br />

QML estimation still yields asymptotically valid volatility forecasts without<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g the distribution <strong>of</strong> zt fully specified (cf. Andersen et al. 2005).<br />

Alternatively, <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> rely<strong>in</strong>g on QML based procedures, fully efficient ML estimates<br />

can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by consider<strong>in</strong>g alternative distributions with fatter than normal tails<br />

for zt. The most common choice is to employ a standardized Student-t distribution with<br />

ν degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom as proposed by Bollerslev (1987). The t-distribution is symmetric<br />

around zero; the number <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g moments is restricted by ν. For the standard<br />

GARCH(1,1) model, the fourth moment <strong>of</strong> zt exists for ν > 4. It is given by<br />

Kz =<br />

3(ν − 2)<br />

. (5.22)<br />

ν − 4<br />

The value <strong>of</strong> Kz is greater than the normal value <strong>of</strong> three. This results <strong>in</strong> an unconditional<br />

kurtosis <strong>of</strong> ɛt that is also greater than <strong>in</strong> the normal case. The number <strong>of</strong> degrees<br />

<strong>of</strong> freedom is treated as an extra parameter and can be estimated together with the other<br />

model parameters. In case <strong>of</strong> the nonl<strong>in</strong>ear GJR-GARCH(1,1) model with zt ∼ t(ν) and<br />

ν ≥ 5, and Kɛ and Kz be<strong>in</strong>g def<strong>in</strong>ed as <strong>in</strong> (5.18) and (5.22), respectively, the fourth<br />

moment exists if (5.17) holds (cf. L<strong>in</strong>g and McAleer 2002).<br />

To account for the observed leptokurtosis, several other parametric distributions have<br />

been suggested. Examples <strong>in</strong>clude the normal-Poisson mixture distribution (Jorion 1988)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!