Applications of state space models in finance
Applications of state space models in finance
Applications of state space models in finance
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
18 3 L<strong>in</strong>ear Gaussian <strong>state</strong> <strong>space</strong> <strong>models</strong> and the Kalman filter<br />
The Kalman filter has orig<strong>in</strong>ally been applied by eng<strong>in</strong>eers and physicists to estimate<br />
the <strong>state</strong> <strong>of</strong> a noisy system. The classic Kalman filter application is the example <strong>of</strong><br />
track<strong>in</strong>g an orbit<strong>in</strong>g satellites whose exact position and speed, which are not directly<br />
measurable at any po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> time, can be estimated us<strong>in</strong>g available data and well established<br />
physical laws. A discussion <strong>of</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g-type applications <strong>of</strong> the Kalman<br />
filter is provided by Anderson and Moore (1979). In economics and f<strong>in</strong>ance, we are<br />
regularly confronted with similar situations: either the exact value <strong>of</strong> the variable <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>terest is unobservable or the possibly time-vary<strong>in</strong>g relationship between two variables<br />
is unknown. Nevertheless, the propagation <strong>of</strong> the Kalman filter among econometricians<br />
and applied economists only really began with the <strong>in</strong>troductory works <strong>of</strong> Harvey (1981)<br />
and Me<strong>in</strong>hold and S<strong>in</strong>gpurwella (1983).<br />
In contrast to the Box-Jenk<strong>in</strong>s methodology, which still plays an important role <strong>in</strong><br />
teach<strong>in</strong>g and practic<strong>in</strong>g time series analysis, the <strong>state</strong> <strong>space</strong> approach allows for a structural<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> univariate as well as multivariate problems. The different components<br />
<strong>of</strong> a series, such as trend and seasonal terms, and the effects <strong>of</strong> explanatory variables<br />
are modeled explicitly. They do not have to be removed prior to the ma<strong>in</strong> analysis as<br />
is the case <strong>in</strong> the Box-Jenk<strong>in</strong>s framework. Besides, <strong>state</strong> <strong>space</strong> <strong>models</strong> do not have to<br />
be assumed to be homogeneous, which results <strong>in</strong> a high degree <strong>of</strong> flexibility. This allows<br />
for time-vary<strong>in</strong>g regression coefficients, miss<strong>in</strong>g observations and calendar adjustments.<br />
Transparency is another important feature <strong>of</strong> structural <strong>models</strong> as they allow for a visual<br />
exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>in</strong>gle components to check for derivations from expectations;<br />
see Durb<strong>in</strong> and Koopman (2001, ¢ 3.5) for a comparison <strong>of</strong> the <strong>state</strong> <strong>space</strong> framework<br />
and the Box-Jenk<strong>in</strong>s approach.<br />
Early applications <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> <strong>space</strong> <strong>models</strong> and the Kalman filter to economics <strong>in</strong>clude<br />
Fama and Gibbons (1982) who model the unobserved ex-ante real <strong>in</strong>terest rate as a <strong>state</strong><br />
variable that follows an AR(1) process. Clark (1987) uses an unobserved-components<br />
model to decompose quarterly real GNP data <strong>in</strong>to the two <strong>in</strong>dependent components <strong>of</strong> a<br />
stochastic trend component and a cyclical component. Another important contribution<br />
is the work <strong>of</strong> Stock and Watson (1991) who def<strong>in</strong>e an unobserved variable, which represents<br />
the <strong>state</strong> <strong>of</strong> the bus<strong>in</strong>ess cycle, to measure the common element <strong>of</strong> co-movements<br />
<strong>in</strong> various macroeconomic variables. Surveys on the applicability <strong>of</strong> the <strong>state</strong> <strong>space</strong> approach<br />
to economics and f<strong>in</strong>ance can be found <strong>in</strong> Hamilton (1994a) and Kim and Nelson<br />
(1999).<br />
The <strong>state</strong> <strong>space</strong> approach <strong>of</strong>fers attractive features with respect to their generality,<br />
flexibility and transparency. The lack <strong>of</strong> publicly available s<strong>of</strong>tware to estimate these<br />
<strong>models</strong> has been the ma<strong>in</strong> reason why only relatively few economic and f<strong>in</strong>ance related<br />
problems have been analyzed <strong>in</strong> <strong>state</strong> <strong>space</strong> form so far. The subsequent sections aim at<br />
provid<strong>in</strong>g a presentation <strong>of</strong> the Gaussian <strong>state</strong> <strong>space</strong> model that is as compact and <strong>in</strong>tuitive<br />
as possible, while be<strong>in</strong>g as comprehensive as necessary to render the employment<br />
<strong>of</strong> this versatile framework by applied researchers possible. More detailed treatments<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> <strong>space</strong> <strong>models</strong> are given by Harvey (1989), Harvey and Shephard (1993) and<br />
Hamilton (1994a), among others. An outl<strong>in</strong>e with a focus on applications can be found<br />
at Kim and Nelson (1999). If not <strong>in</strong>dicated otherwise, Durb<strong>in</strong> and Koopman (2001,<br />
¢ 4–7) serve as standard reference for this chapter.