02.12.2012 Views

Applications of state space models in finance

Applications of state space models in finance

Applications of state space models in finance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5<br />

Conditional heteroskedasticity <strong>models</strong><br />

It is a well established stylized fact <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial time series that the volatility <strong>of</strong> returns<br />

on f<strong>in</strong>ancial assets changes persistently over time and across assets (cf. ¢ 2.2.2). The<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> conditional heteroskedasticity is key to many areas <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ance and f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

econometrics, whether it is <strong>in</strong> asset allocation, risk management, asset pric<strong>in</strong>g or duration<br />

model<strong>in</strong>g (cf. Diebold 2004). In the context <strong>of</strong> this thesis, conditional heteroskedasticity<br />

<strong>models</strong> are ma<strong>in</strong>ly used to model time-vary<strong>in</strong>g relationships <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>direct way. As a<br />

simple regression coefficient is def<strong>in</strong>ed as a covariance-variance ratio, <strong>models</strong> <strong>of</strong> conditional<br />

heteroskedasticity can be used to obta<strong>in</strong> conditional betas based on conditional<br />

variance estimates.<br />

The phenomenon <strong>of</strong> time-vary<strong>in</strong>g volatility, first recognized by Mandelbrot (1963) and<br />

Fama (1965), is commonly referred to as volatility cluster<strong>in</strong>g: quiet periods with small<br />

absolute returns are followed by volatile periods with large absolute returns, then quite<br />

periods aga<strong>in</strong>, and so on. This chapter presents the basic ideas <strong>of</strong> the two most important<br />

concepts <strong>of</strong> captur<strong>in</strong>g time-vary<strong>in</strong>g volatility and excess kurtosis, which is usually<br />

<strong>in</strong>duced by volatility clusters. The ARCH/ GARCH framework by Engle (1982) and<br />

Bollerslev (1986) represents practitioners’ preferred tool to model and forecast volatility.<br />

An alternative way <strong>of</strong> model<strong>in</strong>g conditional heteroskedasticity is <strong>of</strong>fered by the class<br />

<strong>of</strong> stochastic volatility (SV) <strong>models</strong>, <strong>in</strong>troduced by Taylor (1982, 1986). In contrast to<br />

a GARCH model, the SV model adds an unobserved shock to the return variance. This<br />

leads to a higher degree <strong>of</strong> flexibility <strong>in</strong> characteriz<strong>in</strong>g the dynamics related to volatility.<br />

11 The major difference between these two approaches is that ARCH <strong>models</strong> are<br />

observation-driven, while SV <strong>models</strong> are parameter-driven. In the context <strong>of</strong> an ARCH<br />

model, the conditional variance is a function <strong>of</strong> lagged observations, with the correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

likelihood function be<strong>in</strong>g directly available. For SV <strong>models</strong>, the conditional variance<br />

depends on a latent component. As no analytic one-step ahead forecast densities are<br />

available, SV <strong>models</strong> can only be dealt with approximately or by employ<strong>in</strong>g numerically<br />

11 In addition to these two concepts <strong>of</strong> historical volatility, alternative measurements such as<br />

implied and realized volatility are available. As these procedures are based on option pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />

data and high-frequency data for s<strong>in</strong>gle stocks, respectively, they will not be considered <strong>in</strong><br />

this thesis focus<strong>in</strong>g on sectors. For details and an account on the available literature, see, for<br />

example, Andersen et al. (2002), Koopman et al. (2004) or Andersen et al. (2005).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!