02.12.2012 Views

Applications of state space models in finance

Applications of state space models in finance

Applications of state space models in finance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

60 5 Conditional heteroskedasticity <strong>models</strong><br />

lagged squared shocks to the function <strong>of</strong> the conditional variance. However, allow<strong>in</strong>g q to<br />

become large results <strong>in</strong> many parameters to be estimated. This would be <strong>in</strong>feasible given<br />

the positiveness and stationarity conditions that have to be imposed. In many cases, an<br />

ARCH(q) process is not capable <strong>of</strong> captur<strong>in</strong>g both the height and shape dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />

the autocorrelation function; further generalization is required (cf. Pagan 1996).<br />

By <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a lagged conditional variance term to the conditional variance function,<br />

Bollerslev (1986) generalized the ARCH(q) model. The GARCH(p, q) class <strong>of</strong> <strong>models</strong><br />

allows for a more flexible lag structure and for longer memory effects:<br />

ht = ω +<br />

q�<br />

i=1<br />

γiɛ 2 t−i +<br />

p�<br />

j=1<br />

δjht−j<br />

= ω + γ(L)ɛ 2 t + δ(L)ht, (5.5)<br />

with ω > 0 and L denot<strong>in</strong>g the lag operator, where γ(L) = γ1L + · · · + γqL q and<br />

δ(L) = δ1L + · · · + δpL p . For δj = 0 and j = 1, . . . , p, the GARCH(p, q) process reduces<br />

to an ARCH(q) model. Follow<strong>in</strong>g Bollerslev et al. (1994) the process is well-def<strong>in</strong>ed if<br />

all parameters <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite-order autoregressive representation<br />

ht = (1 − δ(L)) −1 γ(L)ɛ 2 t<br />

(5.6)<br />

are nonnegative. It is assumed that all the roots <strong>of</strong> 1−δ(L) lie outside the unit circle. The<br />

condition for covariance-stationary <strong>of</strong> the GARCH(p, q) process is �q i=1 γi+ �p j=1 δj < 1.<br />

5.1.1.1 Statistical properties<br />

A specification with p = q = 1 represents the simplest and most common GARCH<br />

model. As it is found to be sufficient for most empirical applications (cf. Bollerslev<br />

et al. 1992), only the GARCH(1,1) process will be considered <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />

GARCH(1,1) model corresponds to an ARCH(∞) process, <strong>in</strong> which the conditional<br />

variance is guaranteed to be nonnegative with ω > 0, γ1 > 0 and δ1 ≥ 0. Under the<br />

assumption <strong>of</strong> covariance-stationarity, which is assured for γ1 +δ1 < 1, the unconditional<br />

variance <strong>of</strong> ɛt is def<strong>in</strong>ed. It can be calculated as<br />

σ 2 ω<br />

=<br />

. (5.7)<br />

1 − γ1 − δ1<br />

If (γ1 + δ1) 2 + 2γ 2 1 < 1, the unconditional fourth moment <strong>of</strong> ɛt exists. For normally<br />

distributed zt, the kurtosis <strong>of</strong> ɛt is def<strong>in</strong>ed as<br />

Kɛ = 3 � 1 − (γ1 + δ1) 2�<br />

1 − (γ1 + δ1) 2 − 2γ2 . (5.8)<br />

1<br />

The kurtosis <strong>of</strong> ɛt is always greater than three. It captures some <strong>of</strong> the excess kurtosis<br />

usually <strong>in</strong>herent to f<strong>in</strong>ancial time series.<br />

When the GARCH(1,1) model is applied to high-frequency data, a common f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

that current <strong>in</strong>formation has an impact on conditional variance forecasts for any horizon.<br />

This leads to a sum <strong>of</strong> γ1 and δ1 that is close or equal to unity. Engle and Bollerslev

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!