02.12.2012 Views

Applications of state space models in finance

Applications of state space models in finance

Applications of state space models in finance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix A<br />

Brief review <strong>of</strong> asset pric<strong>in</strong>g theory<br />

The concept <strong>of</strong> mean-variance efficient portfolios <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> the sem<strong>in</strong>al work <strong>of</strong><br />

Markowitz (1959) represents a cornerstone <strong>of</strong> modern f<strong>in</strong>ance theory. The risk-return<br />

relationship <strong>of</strong> a portfolio is usually characterized by an asset pric<strong>in</strong>g model, i.e. a l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />

factor model that decomposes the return on an asset <strong>in</strong>to a possibly multidimensional<br />

set <strong>of</strong> common risk factors and an asset-specific component. L<strong>in</strong>ear pric<strong>in</strong>g <strong>models</strong> are<br />

commonly employed to predict returns, to identify risk sensitivities and to estimate<br />

abnormal returns. Follow<strong>in</strong>g Cochrane (2005, ¢ 1–2) this section briefly summarizes the<br />

basic ideas <strong>of</strong> asset pric<strong>in</strong>g theory.<br />

A.1 The discount factor view <strong>of</strong> asset pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The cornerstone <strong>of</strong> asset pric<strong>in</strong>g theory is that the value <strong>of</strong> an asset is equal to the<br />

expected discounted pay<strong>of</strong>f. The risk related to the asset’s payment is explicitly taken<br />

<strong>in</strong>to account. One dist<strong>in</strong>guishes between relative and absolute asset pric<strong>in</strong>g. The former<br />

refers to the pric<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> an asset given the prices <strong>of</strong> other assets. In absolute pric<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

which is at the heart <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ance and <strong>of</strong> this thesis, each asset is valued accord<strong>in</strong>g to its<br />

exposure to fundamental macroeconomic risks.<br />

By employ<strong>in</strong>g the discount factor view <strong>of</strong> asset pric<strong>in</strong>g as proposed, among others, by<br />

Rub<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong> (1976) or Hansen and Jagannathan (1991), asset pric<strong>in</strong>g can be summarized<br />

by the follow<strong>in</strong>g two equations:<br />

pt = Et(mt+1xt+1), (A.1)<br />

mt+1 = f(data, parameters), (A.2)<br />

where pt is the asset’s price at date t, xt+1 is the asset pay<strong>of</strong>f at time t + 1 and mt+1<br />

denotes the stochastic discount factor. This simple and universal approach allows for a<br />

separation <strong>of</strong> (i) determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the empirical representation <strong>in</strong> (A.1), and (ii) specify<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

model assumptions <strong>in</strong> (A.2). By mak<strong>in</strong>g different choices for the function f(·), different<br />

asset pric<strong>in</strong>g <strong>models</strong> can be derived.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!