Applications of state space models in finance
Applications of state space models in finance
Applications of state space models in finance
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
48 4 Markov regime switch<strong>in</strong>g<br />
While γij(l) describes the conditional probability <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>state</strong> j at time t + l,<br />
with the Markov cha<strong>in</strong> start<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>state</strong> i at time t, it does not provide the marg<strong>in</strong>al<br />
probability <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>state</strong> i at a given time t. With the probability distribution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>in</strong>itial <strong>state</strong>, π(1) := (π1(1), . . . , πm(1)) = (P (S1 = 1), . . . , P (S1 = m)), the probability<br />
function <strong>of</strong> the <strong>state</strong> at time t is given by<br />
π(t) := (P (St = 1), . . . , P (St = m)) = π(t)Γ l−1 . (4.10)<br />
For a homogeneous and irreducible Markov cha<strong>in</strong>, π(t) can be shown to converge to a<br />
fixed vector πs := (π1, . . . , πm) for large t. This unique vector <strong>of</strong> dimension m satisfies<br />
πs = πsΓ, (4.11)<br />
and is called the vector <strong>of</strong> stationary transition probabilities. For exist<strong>in</strong>g πs, a Markov<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> is referred to as be<strong>in</strong>g stationary if πs describes the marg<strong>in</strong>al distribution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>state</strong>s for all t = 1, . . . , T .<br />
For more details on the well developed theory <strong>of</strong> Markov cha<strong>in</strong>s and further references,<br />
see, for example, Hamilton (1994b, ¢ 22).<br />
4.2 The basic hidden Markov model<br />
The sequence <strong>of</strong> observations and hidden <strong>state</strong>s <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dependent mixture model are<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent by def<strong>in</strong>ition. Any potential correlation between the <strong>state</strong>s cannot be captured<br />
by an <strong>in</strong>dependent mixture as it does not take <strong>in</strong>to account the respective <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
One method <strong>of</strong> model<strong>in</strong>g serially correlated time series is to use an unobserved<br />
Markov cha<strong>in</strong> to select the parameters. This yields the hidden Markov model as a special<br />
dependent mixture model.<br />
With {Xt} = {Xt, t = 1, . . . , T } denot<strong>in</strong>g a sequence <strong>of</strong> observations and {St} =<br />
{St, t = 1, . . . , T } denot<strong>in</strong>g a Markov cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>state</strong> <strong>space</strong> {1, . . . , m}, their respective<br />
histories up to time t can be written as<br />
X (t) := {X1, . . . , Xt}, (4.12)<br />
S (t) := {S1, . . . , St}. (4.13)<br />
Consider a stochastic process that consists <strong>of</strong> two elements: (i) an underly<strong>in</strong>g and unobserved<br />
parameter process {St} for which the Markov property (4.7) holds, and (ii) a<br />
<strong>state</strong>-dependent observation process {Xt}, which fulfills the conditional <strong>in</strong>dependence<br />
property<br />
P (Xt = xt|X (t−1) = x (t−1) , S (t) = s (t) ) = P (Xt = xt | St = st). (4.14)<br />
This means that with known St, Xt only depends on St and not on the history <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong>s<br />
or observations. The pair <strong>of</strong> stochastic processes {Xt} and {St} is referred to as an<br />
m-<strong>state</strong> hidden Markov model whose basic structure is illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.3, which<br />
is taken from Bulla (2006, ¢ 2).<br />
Generally, different distributions are imposed for the various <strong>state</strong>s. In this thesis, the<br />
Markov cha<strong>in</strong> with transition probability matrix Γ will be assumed to be homogeneous