13.07.2015 Views

Reducing Ethnic Profiling in the European Union - Open Society ...

Reducing Ethnic Profiling in the European Union - Open Society ...

Reducing Ethnic Profiling in the European Union - Open Society ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

49. Studies have confirmed <strong>the</strong> negative impact ethnic profil<strong>in</strong>g has on hit rates. A 1999 reviewof stop and frisk practices by <strong>the</strong> New York Police Department showed that although <strong>the</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong>opopulation of New York was about 22 percent, Lat<strong>in</strong>os made up about 33 percent of all of thosepolice stopped and frisked; <strong>the</strong> black population was approximately 24 percent, yet comprised about52 percent of those stopped and frisked. By contrast, <strong>the</strong> city’s white population (which constitutes40 percent of <strong>the</strong> city’s overall population) only made up about ten percent of all of those stoppedand frisked. The data showed a hit rate of 12.6 percent for whites, 11.5 percent for Lat<strong>in</strong>os and 10.5percent for blacks. <strong>Profil<strong>in</strong>g</strong> correlated directly to reduced efficiency of stops. Eliot Spitzer, AttorneyGeneral of <strong>the</strong> State of New York, The New York City Police Department’s ‘Stop and Frisk’ Practices:A Report to <strong>the</strong> People of <strong>the</strong> State of New York, New York, December 1, 1999.50. This figure was somewhat <strong>in</strong>flated by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusion of items such as penknives. E.J. van derTorre and H.B. Ferwerda, “Preventief fouilleren, Een analyse van het proces en de externe effecten<strong>in</strong> tien gemeenten” (Preventive search<strong>in</strong>g, an analysis of <strong>the</strong> process and <strong>the</strong> external effects <strong>in</strong>ten municipalities Politie & Wetenschap, 2005). Data are available from 187 preventive search operationsconducted from 2002 to 2004 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cities of Amsterdam, Maastricht, Haarlemmermeer,Den Helder, Rotterdam, Heerlen, Utrecht, and Tilburg. Data <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> cost of<strong>the</strong> policy <strong>in</strong> terms of man-hours, and on police conduct. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se operations, 79,499 personswere searched and 2,010 weapons (as def<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> Weapons and Ammunition Act) were found:68 percent stabb<strong>in</strong>g weapons; 16.8 percent were strik<strong>in</strong>g weapons and 2.6 percent were firearms(52 units); 12.6 percent fall <strong>in</strong>to a category of “o<strong>the</strong>r.” The study <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g all 10 cities suggests thatcreative account<strong>in</strong>g took place on a modest scale to <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> seem<strong>in</strong>g effectiveness of <strong>the</strong> results.Thus hobby knives (fish<strong>in</strong>g knives), for example, were also counted.51. Ibid. Dur<strong>in</strong>g 54 preventive search operations <strong>in</strong> Amsterdam from November 2002 to March2004, police searched 32,332 <strong>in</strong>dividuals and detected 702 weapons, only 15 of which were firearms.The operation cost 11,687 officer hours. Results <strong>in</strong> Rotterdam were similar: <strong>in</strong> 50 operations total<strong>in</strong>g9,124 officer hours, 18,687 searches were carried out that detected 578 weapons, 23 of which werefirearms.52. Joel Miller, Nick Bland and Paul Qu<strong>in</strong>ton, “The Impact of Stops and Searches on Crime and<strong>the</strong> Community,” Police Research Series Paper 127, London: Home Office, 2000; Ronald Weitzer andSteven A. Tuch, “Determ<strong>in</strong>ants of Public Satisfaction with <strong>the</strong> Police,” <strong>in</strong> Police Quarterly No. 8(3)2005: 279–297; Joel Miller, Robert C. Davis, Nicole J. Henderson, John Markovic and ChristopherW. Ortiz, “Public Op<strong>in</strong>ions of <strong>the</strong> Police: The Influence of Friends, Family, and Media,” NationalInstitute of Justice Technical Report (2001-IJ-CX-0038); Dennis P. Rosenbaum, Amie M. Schuck,Sandra K. Costello, Darnell F. Hawk<strong>in</strong>s, and Marianne K. R<strong>in</strong>g, “Attitudes toward <strong>the</strong> police: Theeffects of direct and vicarious experience,” Police Quarterly No. 8(3), 2005, 343–365.53. John D. McCluskey, Stephen D. Mastrofski, and Roger B. Parks, “To acquiesce or rebel:Predict<strong>in</strong>g citizen compliance with police requests,” Police Quarterly No. 2, 389–416.54. Rod Morgan and Tim Newburn, The Future of Polic<strong>in</strong>g, Oxford: Clarendon Press/OxfordUniversity Press, 1997.55. Ibid.56. C. Stone and H. Ward, “Democratic Polic<strong>in</strong>g; A Framework for Action,” Polic<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>Society</strong>,Vol. 10, No. 1, 11–45.210 NOTES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!