1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment This raises many questions, e.g.: (1) why may these errors not be openly and freely discussed on the basis of rational argumentation, (2) why may this discussion, despite a guarantee of scientific freedom contained in the German constitution, continue to be prevented by the powers that be in the field of relativity through cynical misuse of their positions of might, (3) why the supposedly best-confirmed theory of physics, as the special theory of relativity is often claimed to be by its supporters, need fear a critical discussion.” 779 / 2005-02-03 - Wilhelm ACHELPÖHLER c/o Anwaltssozietät Meisterernst u.a., Münster. CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report. Extract: “Please find everything else, dear Mr. Achelpöhler, enclosed. We place our trust in you, as the known representative of a citizens’ initiative, in a particular sense, since we regard our own research project and our attempt to encourage public and free discussion on behalf of the so-far-suppressed criticism of the theory essentially as an anonymously organized - though with the disclosure of 1300 named critics by no means anonymous - citizens’ initiative that can only fall back on fulfilment of the basic right to scientific freedom. We also claim on behalf of our project that the critics are not interested in their personal advantage, but in the reappraisal of a wrong turn in the development of our society, from which society as a whole would profit. Just as you, for example, are conducting a lawsuit against a prohibition on demonstration, we are campaigning against a prohibition on criticism - for which, however, we have no right to legal enforcement in the courts. We have therefore informed those responsible at the federal governmental level for culture and science, as well as the ministries of education and cultural affairs of the states and, at the political level, all of the parliamentary fractions in the Bundestag and in the state parliaments.” 780 / 2005-02-03 - Konrad ADAM c/o DIE WELT, Editorial Office. Berlin. CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report. Extract: “Article 5 of the German constitution says: science, research and teaching are free. Why may 95 years of criticism of the special theory of relativity (1908-2003) be suppressed? The aim and objective of our project is to comprehensively document the criticism of the special theory of relativity, which since 1922 has been suppressed and slandered in Germany (and in other countries too) by the academic physics establishment, to inform the public about the suppression and defamation that has taken place up to date and to demand free public discussion as a means of introducing scientific freedom in the field of theoretical physics, to which the critics in Germany have a basic right (!) since 1949. In view of the above-outlined public attitudes, our project will have to give rise to something like a minor culture shock and must therefore also reckon with considerable resistance from all of those engaged in the present and prevailing system of suppression of scientific freedom, who as worshipers of a physical theory have leaned so far out of the window that they can no longer recognize the true state of affairs, determined by the criticism over a period of decades, without losing face. (...) Please find everything else, dear Mr. Adam, enclosed. Your contribution “Jeder Mensch ein Forscher” [Everyone’s a Scientist] in DIE WELT (2.8.04) gave us the idea to send you, too, our work results in the hope of winning your interest for our topic 95 years of criticism of the special theory of relativity (1908-2003) when you appreciate that this criticism has been consequently suppressed and slandered since 1922 - although we supposedly live under the protection of a constitution that promises us scientific freedom. Our free press as the “fourth power”, proud of its guardian duties, generally demonstrates high moral standards and should therefore take up the issue, one would think. Our topic ought to - hopefully - attract as much attention as the doctorate of an elderly lady on the topic of the „currywurst“, which we, like all other grilled-sausage eaters, can only applaud. Moreover, how can “everyone be a scientist” under conditions that prohibit even slight deviations in one’s research from the prescribed pathway, should this give rise to unwanted critical ideas? Who wants to research, only to be banned for his or her findings? In a democracy the first step to enforcing the constitution is to inform - as we have done - those responsible at the federal governmental level for culture and science, as well as the ministries of education and cultural affairs of the states and, at the political level, all of the parliamentary fractions in the Bundestag and in the state parliaments. We are sending you the documents today with the courteous request that you check our work results and - in the event of a positive result of this examination - that you help to inform the public about the existence of the documentation and of the need for public discussion.” 104 G. O. Mueller: STR 2012
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment 781 / 2005-02-04 - Horst AFHELDT, Hamburg. CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report. Extract: “Please find everything else, dear Mr. Afheldt, enclosed. Thanks to your radio interview broadcast on Deutschlandfunk (15.2.04) and your book on “Wirtschaft, die arm macht” [Business That Makes One Poor] we have come to know you as an argumentative author, which has moved us to send you, too, the results of our project (enclosed). Since your fields of study also include physics and political science, and on top of this “the living conditions of the scientific technological world”, you will be able to gain faster access and a deeper insight into the problems raised by our documentation than many other of our addressees.” 782 / 2005-02-04 - Prof. Gerhard AMENDT, c/o Institut f. Geschlechter- u.Generationenforschung, Universität. Bremen. CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report. Extract: “Please find everything else, dear Professor Amendt, enclosed. In your contribution in FAZ (8.11.02) on the parenthood of homosexuals you come to the conclusion that society must conduct an ethics discourse. This awkward demand made on a society that has so far sought to “resolve” many of its problems by looking the other way and by suppression and lies, has moved us to send you, too, our work results, since the problems uncovered by our documentation also demand an ethics discourse on why and for how long the denial and defamation of 95 years of criticism of a supposedly fundamental physical theory is to be concealed from our public. The more fundamental a theory is supposed to be, the more fundamental is the attention needed to the criticism of it. We could adopt the title of your FAZ contribution “Aggressive Persiflage” directly and unaltered for application to the manipulation of the public as regards the special theory of relativity.” 2012 783 / 2005-02-04 - Carl AMERY c/o SPD Ortsverein München-Au. München. CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report. 784 / 2005-02-11 - INSTITUT F. DIDAKTIK DER PHYSIK, Prof. G. Schwarz. Gießen. CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report. 785 / 2005-02-11 - Roland BAADEr c/o Resch Verlag, Gräfelfing. CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report. 786 / 2005-02-11 - NZ NETZEITUNG GmbH, Editor in Chief Michael Angele. Berlin. CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report. 787 / 2005-02-11 - QUANTEN.DE (Internetportal) c/o „ScienceUp Sturm und Bomfleur GbR“, Günter Sturm. Ismaning. CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report. 788 / 2005-02-13 - Hans D. BARBIER c/o Ludwig-Erhard-Stiftung. Bonn. CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report. Extract: “Please find everything else, dear Dr. Barbier, enclosed. Your constant support for liberalism as a regulatory political maxim and particularly your statement of 6.9.02 in your FAZ column (“Singen mit Frankie-Boy”) [Singing With Frankie-Boy] have moved us to send you, too, the work results of our project, especially since several central findings of your column, such as - the truth about the quality of economic control mechanisms has no advocate; - all talk against their better judgement “to secure their small portion of power”; - the fear of those involved to speak the truth; - why happens only what powerful group representatives are barely able to tolerate to secure the power of their group? - have a go with the courage for regulatory political truth! could have been taken over word-for-word for application to the problems uncovered by our documentation, as shown below: - the truth about the actual experimental results and the true evidential force of supposed confirmations of the theory has no advocate; - all propaganda of the theory takes place against one’s better judgement; 105 G. O. Mueller: STR
Page 1 and 2:
G. O. Mueller On the Absolute Magni
Page 3 and 4:
2012 Chapter 9: The Thought Experim
Page 5 and 6:
2012 Preface Chapter 9: The Thought
Page 7 and 8:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment 4
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment T
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment (
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment W
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment h
Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment t
Page 35 and 36:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment F
Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment c
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment I
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment r
Page 61 and 62: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment f
Page 63 and 64: 2012 Chapter 9: The Thought Experim
Page 67 and 68: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment
Page 69 and 70: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment p
Page 71 and 72: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment 2
Page 79 and 80: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment I
Page 89 and 90: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment v
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment d
Page 103 and 104: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment s
Page 105 and 106: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment O
Page 107 and 108: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment a
Page 111: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment 7
Page 117 and 118: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment t
Page 119 and 120: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment O
Page 121 and 122: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment -
Page 123 and 124: Werner Dreibus Dr. Carl-Christian D
Page 125 and 126: Johannes Röring René Röspel Dr.
Page 129 and 130: Albrecht, Jörg - FAZ - Science Alt
Page 131 and 132: Stoldt, Hans-Ulrich - SPIEGEL - Ger
Page 135 and 136: 2012 The text of the letter is publ
Page 137 and 138: 168 Ted Chiang, London 169 CHICAGO
Page 141 and 142: 2012 Serial Numbers 2925-3124 / 200
Page 149 and 150: to 2012 Chapter 9: The Thought Expe
Page 151 and 152: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment c
Page 155 and 156: German Constitution.) Chapter 9: Th
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment N
Page 199 and 200:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment a
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment c
Page 207 and 208:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment F
Page 209 and 210:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment H
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment P
Page 221 and 222:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment S
Page 223 and 224:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment R
Page 225 and 226:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment a
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
show all

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?