1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2012<br />
Chapter 9: <strong>The</strong> Thought Experiment<br />
QuantenWiki - Portal<br />
www.quantenwiki.de/wiki/Kritikpunkte_an_der_SRT<br />
Points <strong>of</strong> criticism <strong>of</strong> the STR taken from QuantenWiki, the WikiWiki <strong>of</strong> the quantum world<br />
“Here is space for a collection <strong>of</strong> points <strong>of</strong> criticism <strong>of</strong> the special theory <strong>of</strong> relativity (STR) with the aim <strong>of</strong><br />
refuting them (the points <strong>of</strong> criticism). On this site the following rules apply: Each point <strong>of</strong> criticism is given a<br />
heading and is then explained in one to two paragraphs. <strong>The</strong>n possible answers are given, with which the point <strong>of</strong><br />
criticism can be got rid <strong>of</strong>.<br />
No discussions here, please.<br />
As for responses to criticism <strong>of</strong> the group G. O. Müller, a separate page has been reserved: Points <strong>of</strong><br />
Criticism Made by GOM”<br />
Points <strong>of</strong> Criticism Made by GOM<br />
from QuantenWiki, the WikiWiki <strong>of</strong> the quantum world<br />
“In June 2004 a CD-Rom on the criticism <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> relativity appeared. <strong>The</strong> CD can be borrowed from a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> libraries (for example, here [1]) and contains in the PDF file Buch.pdf, Kapitel 2 [Chapter 2], a list <strong>of</strong><br />
supposed errors in the theory <strong>of</strong> relativity. Here we want to collect responses to these objections.<br />
GOM Error B4<br />
GOM Error D5<br />
GOM Error D9<br />
GOM Error E10<br />
Note: <strong>The</strong>se pages should only be worked on by supporters <strong>of</strong> the theories <strong>of</strong> relativity. <strong>The</strong> aim is namely to<br />
collect answers to the objections <strong>of</strong> a group <strong>of</strong> opponents <strong>of</strong> relativity as a basis for discussion. Critics <strong>of</strong> relativity<br />
have enough space on other pages <strong>of</strong> this Wiki to explain their points <strong>of</strong> criticism.<br />
From „http://www.quantenwiki.de/wiki/GOM_Kritikpunkte“<br />
This site was last altered at 10:49 on 14th July 2006. A project <strong>of</strong> Quantenwelt.de.”<br />
Qwika - Portal<br />
http://wikipedia.qwika.com/en/Talk%3AFranz_Boas<br />
Talk: Franz Boas<br />
“Einstein has been falsified : see g.o.müller’s 4000 titles anti-relativist bibliography and the 130 fault<br />
catalogue on „www.ekkehard-friebe.de“”<br />
Reboom.com - Portal<br />
www.reboom.info/article/Anti-relativity.html<br />
Anti-Relativity<br />
“This article or section contains information that has not been verified and thus might not be reliable. If you are<br />
familiar with the subject matter, please check for inaccuracies and modify as needed, citing sources.<br />
Anti-relativists and Anti-relativityists oppose what they believe to be the <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Relativity. <strong>The</strong>y <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
argue that there is a scientific establishment that unfairly protects special relativity.<br />
[...]<br />
As mentioned at the beginning <strong>of</strong> this article, anti-relativityists argue that there is a scientific establishment<br />
that unfairly protects special relativity. <strong>The</strong>y (the anti-relativityists) attribute this conspiracy to a variety <strong>of</strong> causes<br />
and motivations. Some believe (and loudly proclaim) that it is due to sheer stupidity on the part <strong>of</strong> physicists, to<br />
the extent that they (Nobel-prize-winning physicists) cannot understand what is obvious to a child. Others<br />
attribute it to “brain-washing“ carried out by the academic system, but this begs the question <strong>of</strong> what motivates<br />
the academic system to do this. <strong>The</strong> most common explanation given by anti-relativityists for the pro-relativity<br />
conspiracy is that many physicists have a vested interest (both financial and emotional) in relativity, and are<br />
simply too proud, stubborn, greedy, and venal to admit the manifest erroneousness <strong>of</strong> relativity when it is clearly<br />
explained to them by amateurs. Naturally, physicsts deny that there is any conspiracy, and contend that the<br />
principle <strong>of</strong> relativity is so widely accepted in scientific circles simply because it provides the best (i.e., most<br />
209<br />
G. O. Mueller: STR