03.12.2012 Views

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2012<br />

Chapter 9: <strong>The</strong> Thought Experiment<br />

QuantenWiki - Portal<br />

www.quantenwiki.de/wiki/Kritikpunkte_an_der_SRT<br />

Points <strong>of</strong> criticism <strong>of</strong> the STR taken from QuantenWiki, the WikiWiki <strong>of</strong> the quantum world<br />

“Here is space for a collection <strong>of</strong> points <strong>of</strong> criticism <strong>of</strong> the special theory <strong>of</strong> relativity (STR) with the aim <strong>of</strong><br />

refuting them (the points <strong>of</strong> criticism). On this site the following rules apply: Each point <strong>of</strong> criticism is given a<br />

heading and is then explained in one to two paragraphs. <strong>The</strong>n possible answers are given, with which the point <strong>of</strong><br />

criticism can be got rid <strong>of</strong>.<br />

No discussions here, please.<br />

As for responses to criticism <strong>of</strong> the group G. O. Müller, a separate page has been reserved: Points <strong>of</strong><br />

Criticism Made by GOM”<br />

Points <strong>of</strong> Criticism Made by GOM<br />

from QuantenWiki, the WikiWiki <strong>of</strong> the quantum world<br />

“In June 2004 a CD-Rom on the criticism <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> relativity appeared. <strong>The</strong> CD can be borrowed from a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> libraries (for example, here [1]) and contains in the PDF file Buch.pdf, Kapitel 2 [Chapter 2], a list <strong>of</strong><br />

supposed errors in the theory <strong>of</strong> relativity. Here we want to collect responses to these objections.<br />

GOM Error B4<br />

GOM Error D5<br />

GOM Error D9<br />

GOM Error E10<br />

Note: <strong>The</strong>se pages should only be worked on by supporters <strong>of</strong> the theories <strong>of</strong> relativity. <strong>The</strong> aim is namely to<br />

collect answers to the objections <strong>of</strong> a group <strong>of</strong> opponents <strong>of</strong> relativity as a basis for discussion. Critics <strong>of</strong> relativity<br />

have enough space on other pages <strong>of</strong> this Wiki to explain their points <strong>of</strong> criticism.<br />

From „http://www.quantenwiki.de/wiki/GOM_Kritikpunkte“<br />

This site was last altered at 10:49 on 14th July 2006. A project <strong>of</strong> Quantenwelt.de.”<br />

Qwika - Portal<br />

http://wikipedia.qwika.com/en/Talk%3AFranz_Boas<br />

Talk: Franz Boas<br />

“Einstein has been falsified : see g.o.müller’s 4000 titles anti-relativist bibliography and the 130 fault<br />

catalogue on „www.ekkehard-friebe.de“”<br />

Reboom.com - Portal<br />

www.reboom.info/article/Anti-relativity.html<br />

Anti-Relativity<br />

“This article or section contains information that has not been verified and thus might not be reliable. If you are<br />

familiar with the subject matter, please check for inaccuracies and modify as needed, citing sources.<br />

Anti-relativists and Anti-relativityists oppose what they believe to be the <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Relativity. <strong>The</strong>y <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

argue that there is a scientific establishment that unfairly protects special relativity.<br />

[...]<br />

As mentioned at the beginning <strong>of</strong> this article, anti-relativityists argue that there is a scientific establishment<br />

that unfairly protects special relativity. <strong>The</strong>y (the anti-relativityists) attribute this conspiracy to a variety <strong>of</strong> causes<br />

and motivations. Some believe (and loudly proclaim) that it is due to sheer stupidity on the part <strong>of</strong> physicists, to<br />

the extent that they (Nobel-prize-winning physicists) cannot understand what is obvious to a child. Others<br />

attribute it to “brain-washing“ carried out by the academic system, but this begs the question <strong>of</strong> what motivates<br />

the academic system to do this. <strong>The</strong> most common explanation given by anti-relativityists for the pro-relativity<br />

conspiracy is that many physicists have a vested interest (both financial and emotional) in relativity, and are<br />

simply too proud, stubborn, greedy, and venal to admit the manifest erroneousness <strong>of</strong> relativity when it is clearly<br />

explained to them by amateurs. Naturally, physicsts deny that there is any conspiracy, and contend that the<br />

principle <strong>of</strong> relativity is so widely accepted in scientific circles simply because it provides the best (i.e., most<br />

209<br />

G. O. Mueller: STR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!