03.12.2012 Views

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 9: <strong>The</strong> Thought Experiment<br />

the subsequent enquiry by Ms. Lopez. <strong>The</strong> further development <strong>of</strong> the correspondence can be found in the postal<br />

dispatch list on pages 140-150 <strong>of</strong> this chapter.<br />

<strong>The</strong> “Open Letter” sent to the members <strong>of</strong> the Bundestag was sent at the same time to 63 editorial staffs <strong>of</strong><br />

German-language newspapers and magazines. None <strong>of</strong> these editorial <strong>of</strong>fices sent a confirmation <strong>of</strong> receipt or a<br />

response to the research project.<br />

<strong>The</strong> next “Open Letter” (<strong>of</strong> 4.2.06) sent to 221 employees on the editorial staffs <strong>of</strong> FAZ, SPIEGEL, SZ und<br />

TAZ [three German newspapers and one news magazine], as well as to a further 13 journalists <strong>of</strong> the same editorial<br />

staffs, received, again after a subsequent enquiry by our partner Ms. Lopez, 2 responses. Two journalists confirmed<br />

receipt, but declared themselves not responsible for the matter (scientific freedom). One announced that he would<br />

pass on the letter to the scientific editorial staff <strong>of</strong> his paper.<br />

<strong>The</strong> next was our “First Open Letter about the Freedom <strong>of</strong> Science” (July 2006) sent to 290 addressees in a total<br />

<strong>of</strong> 11 countries. One <strong>of</strong> the addressees only, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Robert Park (Maryland), at least reported the receipt <strong>of</strong> the letter<br />

on his home page in a few sentences, dismissing it as an irrelevant comment by crackpots, the sort he received<br />

continuously.<br />

Receipt <strong>of</strong> the “Open Letter” on scientific freedom sent to 100 pr<strong>of</strong>essors <strong>of</strong> the HU Berlin and 100 pr<strong>of</strong>essors<br />

<strong>of</strong> the TU Dresden (6.3.07) was confirmed by one addressee <strong>of</strong> the HU Berlin, he stating that he was technically not<br />

the correct addressee, though he nevertheless wished us success - a premiere for our project.<br />

<strong>The</strong> “Open Letter” sent to 200 pr<strong>of</strong>essors was sent at the same time to 46 media and publicists in the Federal<br />

Republic <strong>of</strong> Germany, none <strong>of</strong> these sending a confirmation <strong>of</strong> receipt.<br />

Receipt <strong>of</strong> our (previously unpublished) letter sent to the German President was confirmed by the Office <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Federal President, after subsequent enquiry by Ms. Lopez, though without confirmation that the German President<br />

was informed about the reported violation <strong>of</strong> the German Constitution. An answer in the matter was also given,<br />

implying that nothing was known <strong>of</strong> an impairment <strong>of</strong> the scientific freedom.<br />

<strong>The</strong> “Open Letter on the Courage for Weird Ideas and the Courage for the Freedom <strong>of</strong> Science” (<strong>of</strong> 10.10.07)<br />

sent to the Science Commission <strong>of</strong> the Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee and their Chairwoman Lochte,<br />

in response to an interview with Ms. Lochte in the TAGESSPIEGEL, was given no confirmation <strong>of</strong> receipt, even<br />

after a subsequent enquiry by Ms. Lopez.<br />

<strong>The</strong> “Open Letter” sent to the FAZ in response to an article on anonymous information on scandals (<strong>of</strong><br />

2<strong>1.</strong>1<strong>1.</strong>07), sent to 5 employees <strong>of</strong> the FAZ and 61 German-language print media, was given no confirmation <strong>of</strong><br />

receipt. We were able to appease the fears <strong>of</strong> the FAZ, that perhaps in future no anonymous information on scandals<br />

might be received, with the promise that we will also repeatedly in future inform the FAZ.<br />

<strong>The</strong> “Open Letter” on scientific freedom sent to the 639 members <strong>of</strong> the Society <strong>of</strong> German Constitutional-Law<br />

Teachers (<strong>of</strong> 5.3.08) has so far received one positive answer, subsequently giving rise to a written exchange <strong>of</strong><br />

ideas. Before at least a year has passed and a check has been made on the material sent by us and on the opinionforming<br />

process in periodic committee meetings, this activity cannot be evaluated.<br />

2012<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the Reactions in the Offline World<br />

If one adds all <strong>of</strong> our postal consignments to the addressees (in Germany and abroad):<br />

including individual letters until April 2005: 820,<br />

less the 251 dispatches to libraries 569<br />

the open letter to members <strong>of</strong> the German Bundestag 614<br />

and to 63 print media 63<br />

the open letter to journalists <strong>of</strong> FAZ-SPIEGEL-SZ-TAZ 234<br />

the „First Open Letter“ 290<br />

the open letter to 200 Pr<strong>of</strong>’s <strong>of</strong> the HU Berlin and the TU Dresden 200<br />

and to 46 media outlets and publicists 46<br />

the letter to German President Horst Köhler 1<br />

the open letter to the „Wissenschaftsrat“ / Ms. Lochte 1<br />

the open letter to the FAZ 66<br />

and the open letter to the Constitutional-Law Teachers 639<br />

in all: 2723<br />

25<br />

G. O. Mueller: STR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!