1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 9: <strong>The</strong> Thought Experiment<br />
the subsequent enquiry by Ms. Lopez. <strong>The</strong> further development <strong>of</strong> the correspondence can be found in the postal<br />
dispatch list on pages 140-150 <strong>of</strong> this chapter.<br />
<strong>The</strong> “Open Letter” sent to the members <strong>of</strong> the Bundestag was sent at the same time to 63 editorial staffs <strong>of</strong><br />
German-language newspapers and magazines. None <strong>of</strong> these editorial <strong>of</strong>fices sent a confirmation <strong>of</strong> receipt or a<br />
response to the research project.<br />
<strong>The</strong> next “Open Letter” (<strong>of</strong> 4.2.06) sent to 221 employees on the editorial staffs <strong>of</strong> FAZ, SPIEGEL, SZ und<br />
TAZ [three German newspapers and one news magazine], as well as to a further 13 journalists <strong>of</strong> the same editorial<br />
staffs, received, again after a subsequent enquiry by our partner Ms. Lopez, 2 responses. Two journalists confirmed<br />
receipt, but declared themselves not responsible for the matter (scientific freedom). One announced that he would<br />
pass on the letter to the scientific editorial staff <strong>of</strong> his paper.<br />
<strong>The</strong> next was our “First Open Letter about the Freedom <strong>of</strong> Science” (July 2006) sent to 290 addressees in a total<br />
<strong>of</strong> 11 countries. One <strong>of</strong> the addressees only, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Robert Park (Maryland), at least reported the receipt <strong>of</strong> the letter<br />
on his home page in a few sentences, dismissing it as an irrelevant comment by crackpots, the sort he received<br />
continuously.<br />
Receipt <strong>of</strong> the “Open Letter” on scientific freedom sent to 100 pr<strong>of</strong>essors <strong>of</strong> the HU Berlin and 100 pr<strong>of</strong>essors<br />
<strong>of</strong> the TU Dresden (6.3.07) was confirmed by one addressee <strong>of</strong> the HU Berlin, he stating that he was technically not<br />
the correct addressee, though he nevertheless wished us success - a premiere for our project.<br />
<strong>The</strong> “Open Letter” sent to 200 pr<strong>of</strong>essors was sent at the same time to 46 media and publicists in the Federal<br />
Republic <strong>of</strong> Germany, none <strong>of</strong> these sending a confirmation <strong>of</strong> receipt.<br />
Receipt <strong>of</strong> our (previously unpublished) letter sent to the German President was confirmed by the Office <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Federal President, after subsequent enquiry by Ms. Lopez, though without confirmation that the German President<br />
was informed about the reported violation <strong>of</strong> the German Constitution. An answer in the matter was also given,<br />
implying that nothing was known <strong>of</strong> an impairment <strong>of</strong> the scientific freedom.<br />
<strong>The</strong> “Open Letter on the Courage for Weird Ideas and the Courage for the Freedom <strong>of</strong> Science” (<strong>of</strong> 10.10.07)<br />
sent to the Science Commission <strong>of</strong> the Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee and their Chairwoman Lochte,<br />
in response to an interview with Ms. Lochte in the TAGESSPIEGEL, was given no confirmation <strong>of</strong> receipt, even<br />
after a subsequent enquiry by Ms. Lopez.<br />
<strong>The</strong> “Open Letter” sent to the FAZ in response to an article on anonymous information on scandals (<strong>of</strong><br />
2<strong>1.</strong>1<strong>1.</strong>07), sent to 5 employees <strong>of</strong> the FAZ and 61 German-language print media, was given no confirmation <strong>of</strong><br />
receipt. We were able to appease the fears <strong>of</strong> the FAZ, that perhaps in future no anonymous information on scandals<br />
might be received, with the promise that we will also repeatedly in future inform the FAZ.<br />
<strong>The</strong> “Open Letter” on scientific freedom sent to the 639 members <strong>of</strong> the Society <strong>of</strong> German Constitutional-Law<br />
Teachers (<strong>of</strong> 5.3.08) has so far received one positive answer, subsequently giving rise to a written exchange <strong>of</strong><br />
ideas. Before at least a year has passed and a check has been made on the material sent by us and on the opinionforming<br />
process in periodic committee meetings, this activity cannot be evaluated.<br />
2012<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the Reactions in the Offline World<br />
If one adds all <strong>of</strong> our postal consignments to the addressees (in Germany and abroad):<br />
including individual letters until April 2005: 820,<br />
less the 251 dispatches to libraries 569<br />
the open letter to members <strong>of</strong> the German Bundestag 614<br />
and to 63 print media 63<br />
the open letter to journalists <strong>of</strong> FAZ-SPIEGEL-SZ-TAZ 234<br />
the „First Open Letter“ 290<br />
the open letter to 200 Pr<strong>of</strong>’s <strong>of</strong> the HU Berlin and the TU Dresden 200<br />
and to 46 media outlets and publicists 46<br />
the letter to German President Horst Köhler 1<br />
the open letter to the „Wissenschaftsrat“ / Ms. Lochte 1<br />
the open letter to the FAZ 66<br />
and the open letter to the Constitutional-Law Teachers 639<br />
in all: 2723<br />
25<br />
G. O. Mueller: STR