1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment
I Tyskland er kritiske forfattere siden 1922 strengt forvist fra akademisk fysik, og de har derfor forenet de
kritiske argumenter mod begge relativitetsteorierne i et hæfte med titlen “Hundert Autoren gegen Einstein”, 1931,
som protesterer mod “Einsteinianernes terror”. Hæftet har intet at gøre med antisemitisme, som det var blevet
hævdet af nogle relativister (men ikke af Einstein selv). Denne sammenfatning af kritik fra forfattere i adskillige
lande er aldrig blevet besvaret af relativisterne og aldrig blevet taget alvorligt af det almindelige publikum.
Den ofte udspredte idé, at Nazi-styret i Tyskland 1933-45 førte til rent antisemitisk argumentation i bøger og
blade, der var kritisk over for relativiteten, er ikke blevet bekræftet af vor undersøgelse af de kritiske skrifter. For
årene 1920-44 har vi kun fundet 17 kritiske skrifter af 14 tyske forfattere, som har tilføjet antisemitisk argumentation
til deres videnskabelige kritik: dette er blot 3 procent af alle 570 tysksprogede skrifter fra denne periode. I kontrast
til disse resultater har relativisterne for vane at bagvaske alle kritikere og deres skrifter som antisemitiske: denne
løgn er et stærkt redskab, i det mindste i Tyskland efter Holocaust, og tjener til at presse enhver mulig kritik af
relativitetsteorierne til tavshed.
Under Nazi-styret i Tyskland mødtes desuden videnskabsmænd fra Nazi-partiet og erklærede relativister fra de
akademiske kredse (det overvældende flertal) i München i november 1940 og blev enige om, at den specielle
relativitetsteori skulle betragtes som et anerkendt grundlag for fysikken: dette var virkeligheden under Nazi-styret.
Relativitetens kritikere havde den samme indflydelse på akademisk fysik som tidligere: ingen.”
Hasslberger, Sepp - Blog
http://blog.hasslberger.com/
Physics - Economy - New Energy - The only constant in this universe is change ...
The Eclipse Data From 1919: The Greatest Hoax in 20th Century Science. By Richard Moody Jr. -
Bibliography:
“47. Mueller, G. O. and Kneckebrodt, K. (pseudonyms) 95 Years of Criticism of the
Special Theory of Relativity (1908-2003) The G. O. Mueller Research Project [GOMProject
Relativity] Germany 2006.”
Hille, Helmut - HP
www.helmut-hille.de/raetsel.html
Reflections In and After the Einstein Year of 2005 - A Plea for Expertise and Reason.
Enigmatic Einstein - Essays
“(9) The Subject Matter of the Criticism
My rejection of Einstein’s relativity is no isolated opinion. Yet because of the sheer number of possible points
of criticism, the reasons given by the critics can vary. Apart from the semantic and scientific approaches listed by
me there are also the purely physical reasons, as can be read in the book “Requiem für die Spezielle Relativität”
[Requiem for the Special Theory of Relativity ] (see I/B3) and then again there are the purely mathematical reasons.
It is often so that each individual point of criticism is itself adequate as a reason to reject the STR or the GTR, or
both. One thing, however, is clear: since the existence of the theory of relativity it has been controversially
discussed. There was, for example, an exhibition on the Deutsche Museum in Munich from 29th Sept. until 4th
Dec. 2005, “Über Einsteins Gegner. Die antirelativistische Literatur der frühen 20er Jahre” [On Einstein’s Opponents.
The Anti-Relativistic Literature of the Early 20s] . In a documentation from 2003 G.O. Müller has listed about
3,800 critical publications since 1908. [...]
The support given by representatives of our Western society for democracy, freedom and tolerance vis-à-vis
fundamentalist threats is implausible when these representatives at the same time allow that, in core questions of
science, which are important for the orientation of both man and society and lie at the very heart of our own society,
critical intelligence, objective criticism and alternative explanations are mercilessly suppressed, and this over
decades. The 20th century in particular has again forcefully shown that societies in which the reality is unrecognized
and in which there is no competition of ideas have no chance of standing the test of time. In the end, those
propagating such lies inevitably drown in them. In order to inform our politicians about the suppression of every bit
of criticism of the STR since 1922 and thereby of achieving an about-turn in this behaviour, G.O.Müller wrote an
Open Letter in 2005 sent to each of the members of the German Bundestag, amongst others. (link to the letter at the
end of this page)”
200
G. O. Mueller: STR 2012