1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment Walton, Gertrude (UK) - HP http://home.btconnect.com/sapere.aude/ Ms. Walton has been a supporter of the GOM Project since early on, cf. p. 165. Reclaiming the common sense foundations of knowledge A small selection of books by critics: For an exhaustive documentation of books and papers critical of SR see the German GOM Project Relativity - 95 YEARS OF CRITICISM OF THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY (1908-2003), in particular Kap.4 (Annotated bibliography of critical publications: books and papers; 2221 KB) Kap.5 (Books; 734 KB). Here are some books not listed in the GOM bibliography: A. Agathangelidis: Pseudo-Relativistic Physics, Ziti Editions, Thessaloniki: 1992. A.A. Denisov: The Myths of Relativity Theory (1989). P.M. Kanarev: The Crisis of Theoretical Physics (1996). Al Kelly: Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein’s Relativity Theories. BrownWalker Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA: 2005; ISBN 1-58112-437-6 (paper); 1-58112- 438-4 (ebook).” - [...] “In the A-Z list of critics of foundations I refer to lists of typical titles (books, articles, conference papers); because of its size my references to the GOM Project are highly selective. The email correspondence published by Prof. Bartocci is also of interest. References in the A-Z below are as follows: Ap = Apeiron archive entries at redshift.vif.com/journal_archives.htm. bartml = Prof. Bartocci’s email correspondence at www.cartesio-episteme.net/quest.htm. GE = Galilean Electrodynamics: 1990-99, 2000-04, 2005f.. gom = GOM Project Relativity Kap.4 and Kap.5" 2.3. Critics A-Z “Any such list must have two aims: - to honour critics of relativity theory, and more generally of orthodoxy in physics; - to facilitate access to their arguments. In view of their large number (the GOM bibliography - by no means complete - names ca. 1350 authors) I include here only those critics who have published (or participated in events such as conferences) since 1970, or where GOM-Kap.4 contains information about their arguments (summaries, quotations, reviews, comments).” Wapedia - Portal http://wapedia.mobi/simple/Theory_of_relativity Wapedia - Wiki: Theory of relativity 3. Criticism of Relativity “G.O.Mueller wrote a whole encyclopedia refuting Einstein’s relativity. G.O.Mueller , Aristotle, Kant, Leibniz say space and time are categories of perception, not distortable “things” , and not joined together. The speed of light could be higher. Paul Dirac and others thought that constants can change over time, too (e.g. gravitation).G.O.Mueller lists about 4000 Einstein-critical works since 1905, rallying worldwide for rethinking relativity. The article “Theory of relativity” is part of the Wikipedia encyclopedia.” WebsiteWiki - Portal www.websitewiki.de/Blog-jocelyne-lopez.de Blog-jocelyne-lopez.de - From WebsiteWiki Description: “Presentation of the worldwide criticism of the theory of relativity, particularly scientific documentation and public activities of the G.O. Mueller research group (GOM Project). Presentation of the worldwide criticism of the theory of relativity, particularly scientific documentation and public activities of the G.O. Mueller research group (GOM Project), as well as efforts against experimentation on animals. Website evaluation 2.8 out of 5 (798 opinions submitted) Keywords on Blog-jocelyne-lopez.de G.o., Mueller, Forschungsgruppe [research group], Gom-projekt [Gom Project], Kritik [criticism], 214 G. O. Mueller: STR 2012
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment Relativitätstheorie [theory of relativity], Unterdrückung [suppression], Wissenschaftsfreiheit [scientific freedom], Ekkehard, Friebe, Jocelyne, Lopez, Walter, Babin, Watergate, Physik [physics], Dr., Annette, Schavan, Prof., Jürgen, Richter, Wolf, Singer, Markus, Pössel, Katja, Kipping, Jörn, Wunderlich, Covance, Münster, Tierversuche [experimentation on animals], Tierrechte [animal rights], Tierschutz [protection of animals], Moralische Verantwortung [moral responsibility].” Wiersma, Otto B. - HP www.ottobw.dds.nl/filosofie/consciousness.htmhttp:// Conscious In Time - The Bergson-Einstein-debate about the Duration of SpaceTime. 10 Mar. 2005 – 24 Nov 2005 (last update) keywords: consciousness, duration, spacetime, metaphysics, poliphysics Introduction The book of Bergson (Durée et simultanéité. À propos de la théorie d’Einstein. 1922) and the debate between the two scientists at a meeting, convened by the Philosophical Society of Paris, marked the fall of Bergson’s and the rise of Einstein’s star. Although part of the debate seemed to deal with technical details (e.g. the interpretation of the geometrical models used by Einstein and the role of the observer), the real clash was the one between metaphysics and poliphysics (as mix of politics and physics). As introduction to the Bergson-Einstein debate, I like to sketch a frame of reference related to two keywords in the debate (consciousness and time) and related to the year 1922. [...] The year 1922 1992 was an interesting year for the history of science in general and the history of Relativity Theory (RT) in particular. In this essay we focus on the Einstein-Bergson-debate, but during that year some other developments took place that (in combination) seemed to change RT from physics into poliphysics. Einstein was not only active in the field of physics, but profiled himself also politically as pacifist opponent of the German aggression that lead to World-War I. This triggered some opponents of his physical theory to use antisemitism as ‘argument’ in the physical debate. Mueller (2004,1.2) writes [originally quoted in German, here translated]: “The first significant physical treatise with anti-Semitic comments dates back to July 1922: LENARD, PHILIPP: On Ether and Original Ether. 2nd, increased edition, with a word of warning for German scientists. - Leipzig: Hirzel 1922. 66 pages. With his “word of warning“ Lenard had begun a disastrous onset of political agitation in the physical professional discussion that, ten years later, would become the official politics over a 12year period, with the seizure of power by the National Socialists in Germany.” Mueller analyzed 3789 critical publications regarding the RT for antisemitic ‘arguing’, and found [originally quoted in German, here translated]: “From around 3789 critical publications, the number so far established as anti-Semitic are: - 15 authors, of which 14 German; - altogether 18 publications, of which 17 German; - only works from the years 1920-1944.” And although the percentage of this antisemitic ‘arguing’ was very limited, it backfired during the next decades in a very awkward way: critics of RT who concentrated completely on the physical arguments, were nevertheless accused of antisemitic sentiments. Together with the concealment of the physical criticism, this approach appeared to be a quick and dirty way to ‘win’ the ‘debates’ about RT. [OBW TODO how often this happened? – percentage of the 3789 publications analyzed by Mueller?] (...) In 1922 there was another signal that RT was moving out of reach of any criticism. Mueller (2004, 1.2) [originally quoted in German, here translated]: “On the occasion of the centenary celebrations of the Gesellschaft deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte [Society of German Scientists and Doctors] held in Leipzig in September 1922, two hymnic lectures on the theory of relativity were given by Max v. Laue and Moritz Schlick, whereas no lecture by any of the critics was permitted and no discussion of the theory was conducted. Whereas the relativists until then had met all of the major point of criticism with silence, with this they had succeeded in preventing its public appearance. This situation has not changed since then.” This was in the eyes of Mueller a “kalte Machtergreifung der Relativisten” [cold seizure of power by the relativists], and it meant a revolution of the physical debate [originally quoted in German, here translated]: “The real revolution, however, took place in the introduction of the question of power as a means of deciding the truth and correctness of physical theories: this revolution, despite 8 decades of success, was doomed to failure right from the start.”” 2012 215 G. O. Mueller: STR
Page 1 and 2:
G. O. Mueller On the Absolute Magni
Page 3 and 4:
2012 Chapter 9: The Thought Experim
Page 5 and 6:
2012 Preface Chapter 9: The Thought
Page 7 and 8:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment 4
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment T
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment (
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment W
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment h
Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment t
Page 35 and 36:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment F
Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment c
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment I
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment r
Page 61 and 62:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment f
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment
Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment p
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment I
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment v
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment d
Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment s
Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment O
Page 107 and 108:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment a
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment t
Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment O
Page 121 and 122:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment -
Page 123 and 124:
Werner Dreibus Dr. Carl-Christian D
Page 125 and 126:
Johannes Röring René Röspel Dr.
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Albrecht, Jörg - FAZ - Science Alt
Page 131 and 132:
Stoldt, Hans-Ulrich - SPIEGEL - Ger
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
2012 The text of the letter is publ
Page 137 and 138:
168 Ted Chiang, London 169 CHICAGO
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
2012 Serial Numbers 2925-3124 / 200
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
to 2012 Chapter 9: The Thought Expe
Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment c
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
German Constitution.) Chapter 9: Th
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172: 2012 Chapter 9: The Thought Experim
Page 175 and 176: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment
Page 177 and 178: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment (
Page 187 and 188: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment 0
Page 189 and 190: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment 1
Page 197 and 198: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment N
Page 199 and 200: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment a
Page 201 and 202: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment T
Page 205 and 206: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment c
Page 207 and 208: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment F
Page 209 and 210: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment H
Page 215 and 216: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment W
Page 219 and 220: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment P
Page 221: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment S
Page 225 and 226: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment a
Page 229 and 230: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment W
show all

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?