03.12.2012 Views

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 9: <strong>The</strong> Thought Experiment<br />

terisolasi karena tetap bekerja secara lokal dan membangun jejaring di tingkat lokal, sedangkan isolasi di level<br />

internasional dapat diatasi melalui internetlix. Mueller dkk., dapat memanfaatkan internet sebagai media kampanye<br />

tetapi tidak menjamin akan mendapat respon yang signifikan apabila media massa memberikan kesempatan,<br />

terutama dari ilmuwan di negara berkembang yang memiliki akses internet relatif lebih lemah ketimbang ilmuwan<br />

di negara maju. Dengan kata lain, metode anything goes memiliki keterbatasan ketika berhadapan dengan persoalan<br />

komunikasi sebagai medan yang cukup penting dalam percaturan perkembangan ilmu.“<br />

July 24, 2008 at 10:48 a.m. (Uncategorized)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Relation between (Social) [1] Science and Individual Liberty<br />

on the Perspective <strong>of</strong> Anything goes [2]<br />

Qusthan Abqary<br />

“Feyerabend is well-known as one controversial philosopher because he campaigns for methodological anarchism<br />

and anything goes. Anything goes inherently stands in methodological anarchism which is, according to Feyerabend,<br />

the remedy for science in two conditions that are similar with fascist or chauvinistic. Anything goes cannot be<br />

considered as positive methodology because it is primarily to criticize standards and involves unspecified and<br />

unspecifiable practice.” [...]<br />

“<strong>The</strong> method <strong>of</strong> anything goes does not allude communication as one important area <strong>of</strong> contemporary scientific<br />

activities. Scientists cannot disseminate their controversial ideas, discoveries, even inventions; if they do not have<br />

adequate access to significant media. One interesting experience comes from Germany. A project <strong>of</strong> “95 Jahre<br />

Kritik der Speziellen Relativitätstheorie (1908-2003)” which was conducted and lead by G. O. Mueller, had<br />

received uncomfortable responses from many media neither inside nor outside Europe or USA[51]. I assume that<br />

fascism or chauvinism <strong>of</strong> (social) science has scattered in academic communities and influenced many media. At<br />

this point, I believe that anything goes cannot be used because media has specific and unique ways to publish<br />

something, especially discoveries or inventions <strong>of</strong> (social) science. Media still obeys and submits to the authority <strong>of</strong><br />

scientific communities.”<br />

End notes:<br />

“[51] G. O. Mueller, First Open Letter about the Freedom <strong>of</strong> Science to some 290 public figures,<br />

personalities, newspapers, and journals in Europe and the USA in<br />

http://www.wbabin.net/science/openletter.pdf<br />

published August 2006, last access November 22, 2007. In this letter, Mueller wrote that they had sent the<br />

project report to 290 public figures, personalities, newspapers, and journal in Europe and USA.”<br />

Infos-aus-germanien - Portal<br />

www.infos-aus-germanien.info<br />

Albert Einstein<br />

“Not least due to his friend Moritz Schlick, the theory <strong>of</strong> relativity also caused a stir in philosophy at an early<br />

stage. Since their emergence, serious arguments have been repeatedly raised against both theories <strong>of</strong> relativity.<br />

Over the years more than 130 serious errors in approx. 4000 critical works since 1905 have been analysed. One<br />

particularly serious argument is that space and time are not distortable realities, but only necessary categories <strong>of</strong><br />

perception.”<br />

Internet Archive - Portal<br />

http://www.archive.org/details/G.O.Mueller-Kapitel-9-080916<br />

PDF (442 KB) - Downloaded 91 times<br />

“G.O. Mueller, On the Absolute Magnitude <strong>of</strong> the Special <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Relativity, Chapter 9-080916<br />

Author: G.O. Mueller - Keywords: G.O. Mueller; Jocelyne Lopez; Ekkehard Friebe; criticism; conspiracy;<br />

fraud; pamphlet<br />

Language: German - Collection: open source - Description:<br />

G. O. Mueller, On the Absolute Magnitude <strong>of</strong> the Special <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Relativity, Chapter 9. secret advance<br />

version, presented at the annual conference <strong>of</strong> the GFWP in Salzburg, Austria on 4./5.10.2008<br />

202<br />

G. O. Mueller: STR 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!