03.12.2012 Views

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 9: <strong>The</strong> Thought Experiment<br />

fundamental objections raised, instead <strong>of</strong> organizing only propaganda and brainwashing. As regards the fatal role<br />

<strong>of</strong> the education system to date, kindly compare in particular with the catalogue <strong>of</strong> errors (Chapter 2) <strong>of</strong> section T:<br />

“Social Enforcement <strong>of</strong> the <strong>The</strong>ory, Suppression, Exclusion, Abuse <strong>of</strong> Power, Break with Tradition” (pp 190-<br />

203).”<br />

152 / 2002-10-01 - LEIBNIZ-INSTITUT FÜR DIE PÄDAGOGIK DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN (IPN) an der Universität<br />

Kiel. CD-ROM <strong>1.</strong>1 (Copy No.: 123)<br />

153 / 2002-10-01 - INSTITUT FÜR GESCHICHTE DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, Universität Frankfurt,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. David King. Frankfurt a. M. CD-ROM <strong>1.</strong>1 (Copy No.: 121)<br />

Extract:<br />

“For the first time it is proven that since 1922, in the field <strong>of</strong> theoretical physics in Germany, freedom <strong>of</strong> science<br />

has been done away with by suppression and defamation <strong>of</strong> the criticism <strong>of</strong> the special theory <strong>of</strong> relativity by the<br />

field <strong>of</strong> academic physics, a situation that has lasted up to the present day. This represents a break by physics with<br />

tradition in that it no longer informs the public objectively, but hoodwinks it as to the true status <strong>of</strong> the theory. Until<br />

now - strangely enough - this occurrence and the consequent status has not been noticed by any science sociologist<br />

or science historian or scientific journalist and has therefore not been reported to the public.”<br />

154 / 2002-10-01 - INSTITUT FÜR GESCHICHTE DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, Universität München.<br />

CD-ROM <strong>1.</strong>1 (Copy No.: 122)<br />

155 / 2002-10-01 - INSTITUT FÜR SOZIALFORSCHUNG an der Universität Frankfurt.<br />

CD-ROM <strong>1.</strong>1 (Copy No.: 124)<br />

156 / 2002-10-01 - INSTITUT FÜR SOZIALFORSCHUNG, Universität Stuttgart.<br />

CD-ROM <strong>1.</strong>1 (Copy No.: 125)<br />

Identically Worded Letters<br />

to 15 Ministries in the States <strong>of</strong> the Federal Republic, October 2002<br />

Extracts:<br />

“Dear Sir/Madam<br />

We hereby allow ourselves to draw your attention to our above-mentioned documentation in which we prove<br />

several circumstances that have not previously been made known to the public:<br />

<strong>1.</strong> “For the first time it is proven that since 1922, in the field <strong>of</strong> theoretical physics in Germany, freedom <strong>of</strong><br />

science has been done away with by suppression and defamation <strong>of</strong> the criticism <strong>of</strong> the special theory <strong>of</strong> relativity<br />

by the field <strong>of</strong> academic physics, a situation that has lasted up to the present day. This represents a break by physics<br />

with tradition in that it no longer informs the public objectively, but hoodwinks it as to the true status <strong>of</strong> the theory.<br />

Until now - strangely enough - this occurrence and the consequent status has not been noticed by any science<br />

sociologist or science historian or scientific journalist and has therefore not been reported to the public. [...]<br />

3. Our documentation proves for the first time that the strong tradition <strong>of</strong> criticism <strong>of</strong> the theory since 1908,<br />

right up to the present day, has not become known to the public due to the consequent suppression and defamation<br />

<strong>of</strong> every bit <strong>of</strong> criticism, and that the criticism made has not been refuted. For this reason the special theory <strong>of</strong><br />

relativity is unfoundedly presented to the public as a best-proven theory, which could obviously only be claimed<br />

after the successful refutation <strong>of</strong> the criticism made <strong>of</strong> it. Our documentation shows, in Chapter 2, approx. 130<br />

theoretical errors that have not even been discussed by the relativists because they have prevented the reception <strong>of</strong><br />

the critical publications. What has not been discussed cannot be regarded as refuted. [...]<br />

5. Our documentation shows that since 1922, in the field <strong>of</strong> academic teaching, in popular-science publications<br />

and in the schoolbooks, a completely uncritical adoption <strong>of</strong> the propaganda <strong>of</strong> relativity has been organized; a pure<br />

personality cult with trading in devotional trinketry and triumphal rejoicing. Misusing all <strong>of</strong> the instruments <strong>of</strong><br />

enforcement at its disposal and through unrestrained defamation, the physics establishment suppresses every bit <strong>of</strong><br />

criticism <strong>of</strong> the theory. <strong>The</strong> field <strong>of</strong> science history, and in particular the history <strong>of</strong> physics, pretends to know<br />

nothing about this scandalous state <strong>of</strong> affairs or about the situation which has meanwhile lasted for more than eight<br />

decades.<br />

2012<br />

G. O. Mueller: STR<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!