1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment Wikipedia / deutsch - Portal http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kritik_an_der_Relativit%C3%A4tstheorie Discussion: Criticism of the Theory of Relativity - from Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia “G.O. Mueller must not be left unmentioned! That is a swindle, to repeatedly exclude g.o.mueller, the most important work since 1905! What a cheek! 80.138.153.251 12:51, 11. Apr 2006 (CEST) That this is “the most important work since 1905” can hardly be true. A similar list can be found when one Googles (with the search words) “G. Walton, sapere aude”. To be able to judge whether vandalism is indeed involved here, one must first examine whether in the case of Google the legal prerequisites are satisfied. KraMuc 11:44, 26th Apr 2006 (CEST)” Wikipedia / englisch - Portal www.hereuare.com/getArchived.php?q=&rtq=0&d=268046725573 Special relativity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia “Criticisms of special relativity Criticisms of Relativity theory are normally done from a number of different bases. Some believe that, because Albert Einstein was born Jewish (although he renounced this religion); that Relativity is ‘Jewish science’, i.e. racist ad hominen attacks. Others seem to believe that the world really doesn’t work the way an enormous number of experiments show that it does. Most just seem to misunderstand the physics and fail to grasp the theory. Herbert Dingle was a respectable astrophysicist who was initially a supporter and book author of relativity, but his interpretation of special relativity was subtly different to Einstein’s. Eventually he decided that the theory was inconsistent, and he began a life-long condemnation of Relativity theory in general. His ‘proof’ that special relativity theory is inconsistent has been largely rejected by other scientists, and his alternative theory is incompatible with experimental evidence. The German scientist group g.o.mueller has written a piece critical of Special Relativity: “Über die absolute Größe der speziellen Relativitätstheorie” (2004; downloadable pdf on the net). It is the biggest critical work on Physical relativity ever, especially on Special relativity. It has been sent to hundreds of big libraries, organizations, political parties and printing publications worldwide being a unique attempt motivated by the authors perception of a “systematic suppression of the criticism” since the 1920s. They claim 105 severe faults of the theory and analyze them in detail. They present a bibliography of the about 4000 critical works since 1905. They claim that the most important criticism is that space and time are categories of perception (Kant) which cannot be analyzed by physical experiments that have these categories as preconditions (“Kategorialirrtum“).” Talk: Special relativity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Criticism of Relativity Theory “ The section that starts “The German scientist group g.o.mueller...“ in the current revision is very odd indeed. It’s also pretty incoherent. It looks like it’s been machine translated from German (or possibly Italian) without any editing at all. It appears to be a POV rather than a serious attempt to add to a critical analysis of the issues; the suggested search for a link (and why not the link itself?) at [4] times out, so I can’t do a better analysis of this. The Google cache of this page is most peculiar. —Alex 21:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Antirelativists Talk: Anti-relativity From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Talk: Antirelativists) “G.O.Mueller: most important critical piece since 1905 Please may everybody read this as it is information of the most trusworthy kind. Let us stop the 16-year-Chinese boy infinity0 who vandalizes around here. The German scientist group g.o.mueller has written a piece critical of Special relativity: „Über die absolute Größe der speziellen Relativitätstheorie“ (2004; downloadable on www.ekkehard-friebe.de) It is the biggest critical work on Physical relativity ever, especially on Special relativity. It has been sent to hundreds of big libraries, organizations, political parties and printing publications worldwide being a unique 216 G. O. Mueller: STR 2012
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment attempt motivated by the authors perception of a “systematic suppression of the criticism” since the 1920s. They claim 105 severe faults of the theory and analyze them in detail. They present a bibliography of the about 4000 critical works since 1905. They claim that the most important criticism is that space and time are categories of perception (Kant) which cannot be analyzed by physical experiments that have these categories as preconditions (“Kategorialirrtum“). 80.138.172.139 19:56, 3 February 2006 (UTC) I don’t vandalise, and you should be ashamed of using my age as an attempted attack - I’m not an ADULT who vandalises articles, you loser. GO Mueller has 315 Google hits (http:// www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22GO+Mueller%22) . Do you work for them or something? Infinity0 talk 21:37, 3 February 2006 (UTC) I didn’t find it on that site. Please give a better link, thanks! Harald88 01:28, 5 February 2006 (UTC) „www.ekkehard-friebe.de/buch.pdf“ 80.138.190.9 12:30, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Don’t feed user tailpig, the proxy server puppet. 80.138.190.9 02:04, 7 February 2006 (UTC) Oh, it’s ironic that you’re accusing other people of using proxy servers and sockpuppets. User:Infinity0/Vandal report. Infinity0 talk 20:40, 9 February 2006 (UTC) Now, wait a second. There is a thousand pages of text here that is an encyclopedia itself on the topic of antirelativity, which of course isn’t going to be very popular outside of the fringe. Or at least, that’s what it looks like to me. Problem is it is in German. Is there an Engligh translation? I can write you e.g. a short English summary of each item of the 105 faults on this page for your first orientation if you like. 80.138.191.208 21:36, 7 February 2006 (UTC) That would be a compelling read. —MobyDikc 17:30, 8 February 2006 (UTC) short English summary of some important points , see mueller biobliography for the 4000 critical works, about 1000 in English 1.) Ether The Michelson-Morley experiment did not prove the absence of an ether and was not carried out completely under the 6 planned conditions ... Infinity0 is vandalizing again. He will be blocked if he goes on with it. 80.138.193.152 02:42, 10 February 2006 (UTC) I disagree, I tried to convince those adding the G.O.Mueller paragraph that Wikipedia is not a forum for promotional content. At the very least the G.O.Mueller section needs its own paragraph. Infinity0 will not be blocked. Tailpig 17:08, 10 February 2006 (UTC)” Wikipedia / französisch - Portal http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th%C3%A9orie_de_la_relativit%C3%A9 Théorie de la relativité - Wikipédia, l’encyclopédie libre et gratuite “Cette théorie peut être utilisée pour construire des modèles de l’évolution de l’Univers et est donc un des outils de base de la cosmologie physique. Il y avait 4000 livres et articles contre la conception d’Einstein après 1905 (cf. bibliographie de G.O.Müller). Par exemple, la structure illogique immanente est critiquée.” Wikipedia / pam (Indonesian) - Portal http://pam.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein Albert Einstein - Ibat king Wikipedia “Karagdagang karinan king Aptas Ing Wikimedia Commons atin yang mediang maki kaugnayan kang/king: Albert Einstein Ing Wikiquote atin yang koleksiun da reng mesabi tungkul kang/king: Albert Einstein G.O.Mueller[1] (http://www.cartesio-episteme.net/fis/mueller.htm)” 2012 217 G. O. Mueller: STR
Page 1 and 2:
G. O. Mueller On the Absolute Magni
Page 3 and 4:
2012 Chapter 9: The Thought Experim
Page 5 and 6:
2012 Preface Chapter 9: The Thought
Page 7 and 8:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment 4
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment T
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment (
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment W
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment h
Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment t
Page 35 and 36:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment F
Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment c
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment I
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment r
Page 61 and 62:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment f
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment
Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment p
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment I
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment v
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment d
Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment s
Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment O
Page 107 and 108:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment a
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment t
Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment O
Page 121 and 122:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment -
Page 123 and 124:
Werner Dreibus Dr. Carl-Christian D
Page 125 and 126:
Johannes Röring René Röspel Dr.
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Albrecht, Jörg - FAZ - Science Alt
Page 131 and 132:
Stoldt, Hans-Ulrich - SPIEGEL - Ger
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
2012 The text of the letter is publ
Page 137 and 138:
168 Ted Chiang, London 169 CHICAGO
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
2012 Serial Numbers 2925-3124 / 200
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
to 2012 Chapter 9: The Thought Expe
Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment c
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
German Constitution.) Chapter 9: Th
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174: 2012 Chapter 9: The Thought Experim
Page 175 and 176: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment
Page 177 and 178: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment (
Page 187 and 188: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment 0
Page 189 and 190: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment 1
Page 197 and 198: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment N
Page 199 and 200: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment a
Page 201 and 202: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment T
Page 205 and 206: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment c
Page 207 and 208: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment F
Page 209 and 210: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment H
Page 215 and 216: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment W
Page 219 and 220: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment P
Page 221 and 222: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment S
Page 223: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment R
Page 229 and 230: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment W
show all

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?