1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment
- the fear of the perpetrators of the propaganda to speak the truth, that there has been a criticism
for almost 100 years, which is suppressed;
- why may only be discussed what the powerful representatives of academic physics permit, in order
to secure their group power?
- have a go at it with the courage to support scientific freedom and public free discussion!”
789 / 2005-02-13 - Prof. Bazon BROCK c/o Bergische Universität, Lehrstuhl f. Ästhetik. Wuppertal.
CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
790 / 2005-02-13 - Mathias BRÖCKERS c/o Verlag Zweitausendeins, Frankfurt a. M.
CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
Extract:
“Please find everything else, dear Mr. Bröckers, enclosed. As the author of a critical and combative book on the
attack on Manhattan, we need not explain to you the peculiarity of the continuing suppression of every bit of
criticism of a certain physical theory for almost a hundred years now, or the significance of this swindle of the
public as regards the true status of the theory and of the supposed revolutionary findings derived from its results, or
of the devastating consequences for the state of public opinion.
We would simply draw your attention to the fact that the critics denounced the swindle at a very early stage. In
1925 Ernst Gehrcke spoke of mass suggestion, in 1931 Hans Israel and his two co-editors of the small book “100
Autoren gegen Einstein” [100 Authors Against Einstein] denounced the “terror of the Einsteiners”, in 1930 there
was Johan Hjort with his book “Keiserens nye klaer” (1932: “Des Kaisers neue Kleider” [The Emperor’s New
Clothes]), and in the decades since 1960, too, several Anglo-Saxon critics have not been afraid to speak directly of
swindle and nonsense, some of them distinguished authors: e.g. the Nobel-Prize winner Frederick Soddy and one
of the fathers of the atomic-clock, Louis Essen. The tactic of the powers that be in physics, of sweepingly depicting
all critics as stupid, anti-Semitic, Nazi, envious or otherwise malicious, is only a further lie to cover up the swindle
of the public.”
791 / 2005-02-14 - Giovanni DI LORENZO c/o DIE ZEIT, Main Editorial Office. Hamburg.
CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
Extract:
“The balance sheet of theoretical physics since 1922 is dreadfully successful: a basic right put out of force; a
group of persons slandered and excluded from public life; the public twice deceived, namely as to the true status of
a theory and as to the cause of the deathly stillness in the specialist field; the general and the trade press brought
into line to suppress criticism in the field of theoretical physics.
Sometime or other the contrast should be noticed. In our society the secondary and primary sex characteristics
of important and less-important personalities can be publicly scrutinized. A certain theory of physics, by contrast,
must not be publicly criticized.”
792 / 2005-02-14 - Wilhelm DIETL c/o Ullstein Verlag. Berlin.
CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
793 / 2005-02-14 - Prof. Hans DOBBERTIN c/o Horst Görtz Institut, Universität. Bochum.
CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
794 / 2005-02-15 - Matthias ECKOLT c/o Eichborn Verlag, Frankfurt a. M.
CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
Extract:
“Please find everything else, dear Mr. Eckolt, enclosed. As an author who has himself productively enriched the
world of science fiction and has also addressed the topic of time travel (in keeping with the FAZ report of 31.1.02)
and who himself builds on the freedom of fantasy and therefore certainly understands the importance of scientific
freedom, we need not explain to you the peculiarity of the continuing suppression of every bit of criticism of a
certain physical theory for almost a hundred years now, or the significance of this swindle of the public as regards
the true status of the theory and of the supposed revolutionary findings derived from its results, or of the
devastating consequences for the state of public opinion.”
795 / 2005-02-15 - Jürgen ELSÄSSER c/o Junge Welt, Editorial Office. Berlin.
CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
106
G. O. Mueller: STR 2012