1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment
hundred years now, or the significance of this swindle of the public as regards the true status of the theory and the
supposed revolutionary findings derived from its results, or of the devastating consequences for the state of public
opinion. Should the long-continuing suppression of scientific freedom be no serious problem, then what could be?”
815 / 2005-04-11 - Chefredakteur Hans Werner KILZ, Süddeutsche Zeitung. München.
CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
816 / 2005-04-11 - Stefan KLEIN c/o Rowohlt Verlag. Reinbek.
CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
Extract:
“Please find everything else, dear Mr. Klein, enclosed. As a physicists and a successful free author, and as the
winner of the Georg von Holtzbrinck Prize for Scientific Journalism 2002, we need not explain to you the
peculiarity of the continuing suppression of every bit of criticism of a certain physical theory for almost a hundred
years now, or the significance of this swindle of the public as regards the true status of the theory and the supposed
revolutionary findings derived from its results, or of the devastating consequences for the state of public opinion.
Should the long-continuing suppression of scientific freedom be no serious problem, then what could be?”
817 / 2005-04-13 - Prof. Jürgen KOCKA c/o Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin f. Sozialforschung. Berlin.
CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
Extract:
“Please find everything else, dear Professor Kocka, enclosed. As the president of a scientific centre for social
research we need not explain to you the peculiarity of the continuing suppression of every bit of criticism of a
certain physical theory for almost a hundred years now, or the significance of this swindle of the public as regards
the true status of the theory and the supposed revolutionary findings derived from its results, or of the devastating
consequences for the state of public opinion. Should the long-continuing suppression of scientific freedom be no
serious problem, then what could be?”
818 / 2005-04-13 - Roger KÖPPEL c/o DIE WELT. Berlin.
CD-ROM 1.2, STR Research Report No. 2 and 93 sample pages.
Extract:
“Please find everything else, dear Mr. Köppel, enclosed. We have read with interest your article “Die Arroganz
der Eliten” [The Arrogance of the Elites] in DIE WELT (27.7.04), that in Germany has led to “devastation”, and
we can report to you another case of devastation with the suppression of 95 years of criticism of the special theory
of relativity (1908-2003), this having been organized right up to the present day by the elite amongst our scientists.
Since, according to DER SPIEGEL (18.10.04) you are happily the “Don Quixote of the politically incorrect”, we
need not explain to you the peculiarity of the continuing suppression of every bit of criticism of a certain physical
theory for almost a hundred years now, or the significance of this swindle of the public as regards the true status of
the theory and the supposed revolutionary findings derived from its results, or of the devastating consequences for
the state of public opinion.”
819 / 2005-04-13 - Friedrich KÜPPERSBUSCH c/o probono fernsehproduktion / Editorial Office. Berlin.
CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
Extract:
“Please find everything else, dear Mr. Küppersbusch, enclosed. Since, according to DER SPIEGEL (21.10.02),
you would even be happy to clarify matters, we can, with the topic “Suppression of 95 Years of Criticism of the
Special Theory of Relativity (1908-2003)”, make a proposal that would certainly cause a stir in the media,
particularly in the year of our “new philosopher” and “new Copernicus-Galilei-Newton” - all such apostrophizations
stem, by the way, from the pens of his fans, not from us! We assume that we need not explain to you the peculiarity
of the continuing suppression of every bit of criticism of a certain physical theory for almost a hundred years now,
or the significance of this swindle of the public as regards the true status of the theory and the supposed
revolutionary findings derived from its results, or of the devastating consequences for the state of public opinion.
Should the long-continuing suppression of scientific freedom be no serious problem, then what could be?”
820 / 2005-04-13 - Otto Graf LAMBSDORFF c/o Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung. Potsdam.
CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
Extract:
“Please find everything else, dear Mr. Graf Lambsdorff, enclosed. Since you have always argued in favour of
freedom, for example
112
G. O. Mueller: STR 2012