03.12.2012 Views

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 9: <strong>The</strong> Thought Experiment<br />

Wikipedia / deutsch - Portal<br />

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kritik_an_der_Relativit%C3%A4tstheorie<br />

Discussion: Criticism <strong>of</strong> the <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Relativity - from Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia<br />

“G.O. Mueller must not be left unmentioned!<br />

That is a swindle, to repeatedly exclude g.o.mueller, the most important work since 1905! What a cheek!<br />

80.138.153.251 12:51, 1<strong>1.</strong> Apr 2006 (CEST)<br />

That this is “the most important work since 1905” can hardly be true. A similar list can be found when one<br />

Googles (with the search words) “G. Walton, sapere aude”.<br />

To be able to judge whether vandalism is indeed involved here, one must first examine whether in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

Google the legal prerequisites are satisfied. KraMuc<br />

11:44, 26th Apr 2006 (CEST)”<br />

Wikipedia / englisch - Portal<br />

www.hereuare.com/getArchived.php?q=&rtq=0&d=268046725573<br />

Special relativity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<br />

“Criticisms <strong>of</strong> special relativity<br />

Criticisms <strong>of</strong> Relativity theory are normally done from a number <strong>of</strong> different bases. Some believe that, because<br />

Albert Einstein was born Jewish (although he renounced this religion); that Relativity is ‘Jewish science’, i.e. racist<br />

ad hominen attacks. Others seem to believe that the world really doesn’t work the way an enormous number <strong>of</strong><br />

experiments show that it does. Most just seem to misunderstand the physics and fail to grasp the theory.<br />

Herbert Dingle was a respectable astrophysicist who was initially a supporter and book author <strong>of</strong> relativity, but<br />

his interpretation <strong>of</strong> special relativity was subtly different to Einstein’s. Eventually he decided that the theory was<br />

inconsistent, and he began a life-long condemnation <strong>of</strong> Relativity theory in general. His ‘pro<strong>of</strong>’ that special<br />

relativity theory is inconsistent has been largely rejected by other scientists, and his alternative theory is incompatible<br />

with experimental evidence.<br />

<strong>The</strong> German scientist group g.o.mueller has written a piece critical <strong>of</strong> Special Relativity:<br />

“Über die absolute Größe der speziellen Relativitätstheorie” (2004; downloadable pdf on the net).<br />

It is the biggest critical work on Physical relativity ever, especially on Special relativity. It has been sent to<br />

hundreds <strong>of</strong> big libraries, organizations, political parties and printing publications worldwide being a unique<br />

attempt motivated by the authors perception <strong>of</strong> a “systematic suppression <strong>of</strong> the criticism” since the 1920s. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

claim 105 severe faults <strong>of</strong> the theory and analyze them in detail. <strong>The</strong>y present a bibliography <strong>of</strong> the about 4000<br />

critical works since 1905. <strong>The</strong>y claim that the most important criticism is that space and time are categories <strong>of</strong><br />

perception (Kant) which cannot be analyzed by physical experiments that have these categories as preconditions<br />

(“Kategorialirrtum“).”<br />

Talk: Special relativity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<br />

Criticism <strong>of</strong> Relativity <strong>The</strong>ory<br />

“ <strong>The</strong> section that starts “<strong>The</strong> German scientist group g.o.mueller...“ in the current revision is very odd indeed.<br />

It’s also pretty incoherent. It looks like it’s been machine translated from German (or possibly Italian) without any<br />

editing at all. It appears to be a POV rather than a serious attempt to add to a critical analysis <strong>of</strong> the issues; the<br />

suggested search for a link (and why not the link itself?) at [4] times out, so I can’t do a better analysis <strong>of</strong> this. <strong>The</strong><br />

Google cache <strong>of</strong> this page is most peculiar. —Alex 21:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)”<br />

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Antirelativists<br />

Talk: Anti-relativity<br />

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Talk: Antirelativists)<br />

“G.O.Mueller: most important critical piece since 1905<br />

Please may everybody read this as it is information <strong>of</strong> the most trusworthy kind. Let us stop the 16-year-Chinese<br />

boy infinity0 who vandalizes around here.<br />

<strong>The</strong> German scientist group g.o.mueller has written a piece critical <strong>of</strong> Special relativity:<br />

„Über die absolute Größe der speziellen Relativitätstheorie“ (2004; downloadable on www.ekkehard-friebe.de)<br />

It is the biggest critical work on Physical relativity ever, especially on Special relativity. It has been sent to<br />

hundreds <strong>of</strong> big libraries, organizations, political parties and printing publications worldwide being a unique<br />

216<br />

G. O. Mueller: STR 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!