1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 9: <strong>The</strong> Thought Experiment<br />
Wikipedia / deutsch - Portal<br />
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kritik_an_der_Relativit%C3%A4tstheorie<br />
Discussion: Criticism <strong>of</strong> the <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Relativity - from Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia<br />
“G.O. Mueller must not be left unmentioned!<br />
That is a swindle, to repeatedly exclude g.o.mueller, the most important work since 1905! What a cheek!<br />
80.138.153.251 12:51, 1<strong>1.</strong> Apr 2006 (CEST)<br />
That this is “the most important work since 1905” can hardly be true. A similar list can be found when one<br />
Googles (with the search words) “G. Walton, sapere aude”.<br />
To be able to judge whether vandalism is indeed involved here, one must first examine whether in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
Google the legal prerequisites are satisfied. KraMuc<br />
11:44, 26th Apr 2006 (CEST)”<br />
Wikipedia / englisch - Portal<br />
www.hereuare.com/getArchived.php?q=&rtq=0&d=268046725573<br />
Special relativity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<br />
“Criticisms <strong>of</strong> special relativity<br />
Criticisms <strong>of</strong> Relativity theory are normally done from a number <strong>of</strong> different bases. Some believe that, because<br />
Albert Einstein was born Jewish (although he renounced this religion); that Relativity is ‘Jewish science’, i.e. racist<br />
ad hominen attacks. Others seem to believe that the world really doesn’t work the way an enormous number <strong>of</strong><br />
experiments show that it does. Most just seem to misunderstand the physics and fail to grasp the theory.<br />
Herbert Dingle was a respectable astrophysicist who was initially a supporter and book author <strong>of</strong> relativity, but<br />
his interpretation <strong>of</strong> special relativity was subtly different to Einstein’s. Eventually he decided that the theory was<br />
inconsistent, and he began a life-long condemnation <strong>of</strong> Relativity theory in general. His ‘pro<strong>of</strong>’ that special<br />
relativity theory is inconsistent has been largely rejected by other scientists, and his alternative theory is incompatible<br />
with experimental evidence.<br />
<strong>The</strong> German scientist group g.o.mueller has written a piece critical <strong>of</strong> Special Relativity:<br />
“Über die absolute Größe der speziellen Relativitätstheorie” (2004; downloadable pdf on the net).<br />
It is the biggest critical work on Physical relativity ever, especially on Special relativity. It has been sent to<br />
hundreds <strong>of</strong> big libraries, organizations, political parties and printing publications worldwide being a unique<br />
attempt motivated by the authors perception <strong>of</strong> a “systematic suppression <strong>of</strong> the criticism” since the 1920s. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
claim 105 severe faults <strong>of</strong> the theory and analyze them in detail. <strong>The</strong>y present a bibliography <strong>of</strong> the about 4000<br />
critical works since 1905. <strong>The</strong>y claim that the most important criticism is that space and time are categories <strong>of</strong><br />
perception (Kant) which cannot be analyzed by physical experiments that have these categories as preconditions<br />
(“Kategorialirrtum“).”<br />
Talk: Special relativity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<br />
Criticism <strong>of</strong> Relativity <strong>The</strong>ory<br />
“ <strong>The</strong> section that starts “<strong>The</strong> German scientist group g.o.mueller...“ in the current revision is very odd indeed.<br />
It’s also pretty incoherent. It looks like it’s been machine translated from German (or possibly Italian) without any<br />
editing at all. It appears to be a POV rather than a serious attempt to add to a critical analysis <strong>of</strong> the issues; the<br />
suggested search for a link (and why not the link itself?) at [4] times out, so I can’t do a better analysis <strong>of</strong> this. <strong>The</strong><br />
Google cache <strong>of</strong> this page is most peculiar. —Alex 21:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)”<br />
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Antirelativists<br />
Talk: Anti-relativity<br />
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Talk: Antirelativists)<br />
“G.O.Mueller: most important critical piece since 1905<br />
Please may everybody read this as it is information <strong>of</strong> the most trusworthy kind. Let us stop the 16-year-Chinese<br />
boy infinity0 who vandalizes around here.<br />
<strong>The</strong> German scientist group g.o.mueller has written a piece critical <strong>of</strong> Special relativity:<br />
„Über die absolute Größe der speziellen Relativitätstheorie“ (2004; downloadable on www.ekkehard-friebe.de)<br />
It is the biggest critical work on Physical relativity ever, especially on Special relativity. It has been sent to<br />
hundreds <strong>of</strong> big libraries, organizations, political parties and printing publications worldwide being a unique<br />
216<br />
G. O. Mueller: STR 2012