1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2012<br />
Chapter 9: <strong>The</strong> Thought Experiment<br />
Chapter 9<br />
<strong>The</strong> Thought Experiment<br />
<strong>1.</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Need</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Approaches</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> Break with Tradition <strong>of</strong> 1922<br />
First Exposed in the Year 2001<br />
<strong>The</strong> 1922 break with tradition in “theoretical physics”, brought about - firstly - by a sei<strong>zur</strong>e <strong>of</strong> power by the<br />
relativists within academic “theoretical physics” as a means <strong>of</strong> expelling the critical minority from scientific circles<br />
and - secondly - by the subsequent breach <strong>of</strong> faith vis-à-vis the public in concealing this sei<strong>zur</strong>e <strong>of</strong> power, was first<br />
exposed in terms <strong>of</strong> concrete occurrences by the present documentation, text version <strong>1.</strong>1, in the year 2001; cf.<br />
Chapter 3: <strong>The</strong> Relativity Fairy Tale, pp. 288-294.<br />
In the newer text version <strong>1.</strong>2 from 2004, the topic was handled in Chapter 1, Introduction (pp. 14-21) and in<br />
Chapter 3, <strong>The</strong> Relativity Fairy Tale (pp. 270-275).<br />
Up until the year 2001 this break with tradition undertaken by the academic “scientific community” had remained<br />
fully unknown to the public at large. <strong>The</strong> organizers <strong>of</strong> the academic physics community had understandably kept<br />
this secret, the other scientists and science historians had said nothing and the pr<strong>of</strong>essional and general press<br />
organizations had been brought into line and had, by strict censorship, prevented the truth from seeping through to<br />
the public.<br />
Since 1922 the physicists, the other scientists and the media moguls have created a large, secretive action group<br />
against the public in Germany, a cartel <strong>of</strong> censorship and boycott to prevent the very existence <strong>of</strong> any form <strong>of</strong><br />
criticism <strong>of</strong> the special theory <strong>of</strong> relativity from becoming known.<br />
One can well describe the events <strong>of</strong> 1922 as a conspiracy, as the agreement <strong>of</strong> a group <strong>of</strong> persons led by Planck,<br />
v. Laue, Born and Einstein to engage in clandestine, joint activities to the detriment <strong>of</strong> the public at large, in which<br />
scientific freedom in the field <strong>of</strong> theoretical physics would be done away with and the public would be deluded into<br />
believing in the primitive knockabout comedy <strong>of</strong> a candid, objectively critical natural science. <strong>The</strong>se academic<br />
scientists henceforth behave as liars and cheaters. <strong>The</strong> conspiracy was a complete success. For the critics the<br />
catastrophic result can already be seen in 1922 in Leipzig - with the exclusion <strong>of</strong> criticism from the centenary<br />
celebrations - as well as in the subsequent years.<br />
Again and again, critics have denounced in their writings the conspiracy <strong>of</strong> the relativistic physicists and their<br />
overwhelming success, as the “Terror der Einsteinianer” [Terror <strong>of</strong> the Einsteiners] (in the foreword to “Hundert<br />
1<br />
G. O. Mueller: STR