03.12.2012 Views

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 9: <strong>The</strong> Thought Experiment<br />

(5) A complete correspondence <strong>of</strong> the two scandals shows up in the findings <strong>of</strong> the judge: An “eroded” sense <strong>of</strong><br />

right and wrong means nothing other than a missing sense <strong>of</strong> right and wrong, and organized unaccountability<br />

means absolute unaccountability, that can no longer be exceeded. Exactly these conditions <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> rights also<br />

make academic physics to the “nightmare” <strong>of</strong> every honest critic <strong>of</strong> physics.<br />

(6) <strong>The</strong> unanimous evaluation <strong>of</strong> the processes at Siemens in the media, as the “biggest bribery scandal in<br />

German business history” constitutes a full parallel to the biggest bribery scandal in German science history - that<br />

the conformed press, however, still dare not discover, even after 2001 (the year <strong>of</strong> the first publication <strong>of</strong> our<br />

documentation).<br />

(7) Result: despite different spheres <strong>of</strong> valuation, the multiple fraud, the effective lack <strong>of</strong> controls and<br />

particularly the condition <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> rights in the system constitute significant common features. <strong>The</strong> common<br />

ground, that each represents the “biggest” <strong>of</strong> its sort, will only become apparent when the public reappraisal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relativity catastrophe begins.<br />

2012<br />

4. Comparison <strong>of</strong> the Relativity Catastrophe<br />

with the Behaviour <strong>of</strong> the Government in the Case <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Final Nuclear-Waste Research Disposal Site “Asse”<br />

<strong>The</strong> former potassium mine “Asse” (rural district <strong>of</strong> Wolfenbüttel) houses the “research mine” Asse II as the<br />

first German final disposal site for radioactive waste. As sources we have three reports to hand: the TAGESSPIEGEL<br />

<strong>of</strong> 7.7.08; the FAZ <strong>of</strong> 29.7.08; and the WELT <strong>of</strong> <strong>1.</strong>8.08. <strong>The</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Asse is only understandable in the context <strong>of</strong> a<br />

strictly chronological presentation.<br />

1965: <strong>The</strong> Bonn Ministry <strong>of</strong> Research permits the association for radiology and ecological research, GSF, to<br />

purchase the disused mine. <strong>The</strong> mine is only subject to mining law, not to atomic supervision!<br />

1967: An expert report prepared by scientists gave assurances that an inrush <strong>of</strong> water or <strong>of</strong> brine from outside<br />

could effectively be ruled out - with “a probability approaching certainty” - in the pit Asse. <strong>The</strong> research purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

Asse II: suitability <strong>of</strong> the salt rock for the final disposal <strong>of</strong> nuclear waste.<br />

“Within a few years”: the test mine becomes a storage place for nuclear waste. Contents:<br />

125000 drums, initially stacked, then just dumped. As to those responsible for this decision, nothing is said on<br />

this by any <strong>of</strong> our sources. <strong>The</strong>y don’t even bother to raise the question.<br />

1978, May: In Asse the limit values for permissible radioactivity were exceeded, according to a letter from this<br />

period sent by the Goslar mining authority to the Clausthal-Zellerfeld state mining authority, which became known<br />

in July 2008. <strong>The</strong> mining authority informs its state mining authority about nuclear-law problems. With this we are<br />

already talking <strong>of</strong> 30 years <strong>of</strong> concealment from the public.<br />

1979: A hydraulic engineer reported that groundwater would soon seep into Asse and that the installation would<br />

be flooded. At that time the neighbouring Asse I had already broken in and was full <strong>of</strong> water. Contrary to this, a<br />

mining expert - who had been a head scientist at Asse II for 30 years until 1995 - found that an inrush <strong>of</strong> water was<br />

highly unlikely.<br />

“From this point on”: “strict silence was observed about the processes in the nuclear-waste mine and Asse<br />

became a lamentable parable <strong>of</strong> the handling <strong>of</strong> the radioactive legacy <strong>of</strong> the nuclear age. “Suppressing, postponing,<br />

concealing”, this was the principle by means <strong>of</strong> which the operator pacified the public over decades, complained<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the civil servants from the Federal Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment now [2008] entrusted with the investigation”<br />

(TS, 7.7.08).<br />

Supervision is still only a matter for the state authority for mining!<br />

1988: <strong>The</strong> inrush <strong>of</strong> water prophesied in 1979 and at the same time declared as highly unlikely begins 100<br />

metres above the chambers containing the nuclear waste. <strong>The</strong> influx gradually rose to a current 12000 litres a day;<br />

is collected and taken away. Until 1995 - i.e. 7 years long - nothing else is undertaken.<br />

1988: Radioactivity limit values exceeded “by a factor <strong>of</strong> fifteen” (FAZ).<br />

1993: Certain limit values exceeded “by a factor <strong>of</strong> fifteen” (FAZ).<br />

19<br />

G. O. Mueller: STR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!