03.12.2012 Views

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 9: <strong>The</strong> Thought Experiment<br />

unified, coherent, heuristically productive) account <strong>of</strong> phenomena. <strong>The</strong> German scientist group G.O.Mueller has<br />

written an encyclopedia being the biggest critical work ever on Special relativity: “Über die absolute Größe der<br />

speziellen Relativitätstheorie” (2004;on www.ekkehard-friebe.de/buch.pdf ). According to the authors, there has<br />

been a “systematic suppression <strong>of</strong> the criticism” since the 1920s. <strong>The</strong>y claim 105 severe faults and about 20<br />

manipulation strategies <strong>of</strong> the supporters <strong>of</strong> relativity and analyze them in detail. <strong>The</strong>y also claim that the most<br />

important criticism is that space and time are categories <strong>of</strong> perception (Kant) which cannot be analyzed by<br />

physical experiments having these categories as preconditions (“Kategorialirrtum“).This work has more than<br />

1000 pages including the first complete bibliography <strong>of</strong> the about 4000 critical works since 1905.”<br />

Relativity<strong>of</strong>Light.com - HP<br />

www.relativity<strong>of</strong>light.com/Chapter<strong>1.</strong>pdf<br />

“<strong>The</strong> 42 chapters which comprise this treatise (and their bibliography) will be added to this website in<br />

sequential order as they are edited during the calendar year 2008.”<br />

Chapter One, S. 10-11:<br />

“<strong>The</strong>re are many other sceptics and critics (see Ridgen, p. 98), especially on the Internet. (For example, see G.<br />

O. Mueller: 95 Years <strong>of</strong> Criticism <strong>of</strong> the Special <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Relativity,<br />

http:// www.wbabin.net/science/mueller.pdf.)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Ridgen recently concluded that:<br />

“<strong>The</strong> public response to the theory <strong>of</strong> special relativity and its consequences was, and is, one <strong>of</strong> incredulity<br />

among both amateurs and pr<strong>of</strong>essionals.” (Rigden, p. 102)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor David Bohm, himself a relativist, also points out that: “... it must not be supposed that relativity is an<br />

iron-clad certainty, which should not be questioned…it is, therefore necessary…to apply the theory in a tentative<br />

manner, being alert and ready to criticize it, and if necessary to replace it ...” (Bohm, p. 109)<br />

relativ-kritisch.com - Portal<br />

www.relativ-kritisch.com/gutachten/res_a09.html<br />

Appraisal <strong>of</strong> the Criticism <strong>of</strong> the <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Relativity Author: Ralf Kannenberg.<br />

Appraisal: GOM Error A9 - link: buch.pdf<br />

Reference 1: buch.pdf, page 48<br />

Reference 2: GOM Error A9, the 3K background radiation,<br />

xttp://www.quantenwiki.de/wiki/GOM_Fehler_A9<br />

Appraisal: GOM Error A9 ...“ Further appraisals.<br />

Relay-for-life - Portal<br />

http://www.relayforlife.it/t/th/theorie_de_la_relativite_<strong>1.</strong>html<br />

Théorie de la relativité<br />

“Il y avait 4000 livres et articles contre la conception d’Einstein après 1905 (cf. bibliographie de G.O.Müller).<br />

Par exemple, la structure illogique immanente est critiquée.”<br />

Richter, Max - Blog<br />

http://technorati.com/tag/Max%2BRichter<br />

“Did Ms. Annette Schavan, Federal Minister for Education and Research, have the documentation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

research group G.O. Mueller checked?<br />

http://www.jocelyne-lopez.de/blog/?p=211<br />

210<br />

G. O. Mueller: STR 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!