1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment
the fathers of the atomic-clock, Louis Essen. The tactic of the powers that be in physics, of sweepingly depicting all
critics as stupid, anti-Semitic, Nazi, envious or otherwise malicious, is only a further lie to cover up the swindle of
the public.”
803 / 2005-02-17 - Jürgen VON GERLACH c/o Pressestelle des Bundesgerichtshofs. Karlsruhe.
CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
Extract:
“Please find everything else, dear Dr. von Gerlach, enclosed. As an outstanding representative of jurisprudence
and as an experienced Federal High Court judge, particularly in questions of freedom of the press, we need not
explain to you the peculiarity of the continuing suppression of every bit of criticism of a certain physical theory for
almost a hundred years now, or the significance of this swindle of the public as regards the true status of the theory
and the supposed revolutionary findings derived from its results, or of the devastating consequences for the state of
public opinion. Should the long-continuing suppression of scientific freedom be no serious problem for the basic
right to scientific freedom and to freedom of the press, then what could be?”
804 / 2005-02-17 - Herbert GRAML c/o Institut für Zeitgeschichte. München.
CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
805 / 2005-02-17 - Prof. Walter GREINER c/o Inst. f. Theoretische Physik, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Univ.,
Frankfurt a. M. CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
Extract:
“Please find everything else, dear Professor Greiner, enclosed. As a prominent representative of theoretical
physics you posted a reader’s letter in FAZ on 13.10.02, on the topic of uncovered fraudulent behaviour. You
described the critical examination of all results as decisive, stressed the obligation to critical examination by coauthors
of the results and underlined that recognition of the first experimental results must only be given after
verification by second and third experiments, reproducibility being fundamental to every discovery. These
principles invariably find general acceptance, though they have been grossly and deliberately disregarded for more
than 80 years by the suppression and sweeping defamation of every bit of criticism of the special theory of
relativity, as our documentation with its references to roughly 3800 critical publications proves, these having been
banned from branch-internal and public discussion of the supposedly revolutionizing findings. In view of your
avowal to the generally recognized principles of critical handling of scientific discoveries, we need not explain to
you the peculiarity of the continuing suppression of every bit of criticism of a certain physical theory for almost a
hundred years now, or the significance of this swindle of the public as regards the true status of the theory and the
supposed revolutionary findings derived from its results, or of the devastating consequences for the state of public
opinion. Should the long-continuing suppression of scientific freedom be no serious problem, then what could be?”
806 / 2005-02-18 - Prof. Dieter GRIMM c/o Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin. Berlin.
CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
Extract:
“Please find everything else, dear Professor Grimm, enclosed. As an outstanding representative of jurisprudence
and as an experienced constitutional judge, particularly in questions of freedom of the press, we need not explain to
you the peculiarity of the continuing suppression of every bit of criticism of a certain physical theory for almost a
hundred years now, or the significance of this swindle of the public as regards the true status of the theory and the
supposed revolutionary findings derived from its results, or of the devastating consequences for the state of public
opinion. What particularly impressed us was your vote in the discussion with DIE WELT (14.8.04) on islamists
and terrorism: “One must tolerate differences.” Applied to the problems of theoretical physics unfolded here, the
vote must be: “One must tolerate criticism.””
807 / 2005-02-18 - Klaus HARPPRECHT c/o DIE ZEIT. Hamburg.
CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
808 / 2005-03-27 - Dietmar DATH c/o Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Editorial Office / Features Section.
Frankfurt a. M. CD-ROM 1.2 with printout of 93 sample pages, 2nd Progress Report.
Extract:
“Please find everything else, dear Mr. Dath, enclosed. From various contributions in the FAZ over the past
months you have shown yourself to be an authority on the theories of relativity, though you seem, on the basis of
your literature report “Am allerwenigsten hat die Schweiz begriffen” [The Swiss Have Understood Least of All]
(16.3.05), not to have taken note of the existence of the work results of our research report since 2001 - although
108
G. O. Mueller: STR 2012