1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment
This is shown, for example, by a thread from the interdisciplinary INTERDIS-AKADEMIE (meanwhile
deleted): Who is G.O. Mueller?
Ekkehard Friebe: I have meanwhile ascertained that Mr. G. O. Mueller, too, is very clever. This is something
I will naturally not withhold from you. It has to do with Chapter 1 (Introduction) of his documentation ... “
http://www.jocelyne-lopez.de/blog
Accompanies, as a partner, the activities of the GOM project. An example:
25th November 2007: “November 2007: G.O. Mueller writes to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung on
Anonymous Information on Scandals
Open Letter Sent to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung on Anonymous Information on Scandals
Distribution list at the end of the letter
Re.: Passing of the law on the storage of telephone-line data in the German Parliament [Bundestag]
In connection with: Article by Michael Hanfeld: “Auf Vorrat. Bei Anruf abgehört: Wie man uns ausforscht”
[In Store. On call, Bugged. How One Sounds Us Out], FAZ, 10.11.07
Dear Mr. Schirrmacher
We respectfully draw your attention to the following three passages in the article by Mr. Hanfeld, who explains
the consequences of the new law:
Quote 1 : “Those thereby threatened in the “second row” are those who receive e-mails or telephone calls;
such as the journalists. Those primarily intimidated and held back from disclosure are of course the informers.
To give an anonymous tip about a scandal that would immediately cost one one’s head, if one’s identity were to
become known, was always dangerous. Now it has become impossible. Blessed be the days in which Carl
Bernstein and Bob Woodward brought their source “Deep Throat” to bubbling over in uncovering the
Watergate scandal. Now one can’t even arrange a secret meeting in the basement garage, unless one does so
with the help of bush telegraphy.”
LYCOS iQ - Portal
http://iq.lycos.de/qa/show/1737998/wurde-die-Rel...ge-gestellt/?id=1737998
Was the theory of relativity ever proved, or ever questioned?
Are there, apart from theories in favour of the theory of relativity, also theories that seek to prove the
opposite?
5 answers - 4:
“As AdmPicard has already superbly written, there is hardly a chance of conclusively proving the theory of
relativity. In scientific circles the task is rather one of disproving the theory. This has not really been achieved so
far, neither in the case of STR nor of GTR. But there have been and still are very many sceptics and critics. There
is also a great project (G. O. Mueller) that has collected an amazing total of 3789 critical work on the theory of
relativity. -
http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/partner.html“
Markweger, Robert (Austria) - HP
http://www.markweger.at/geg.html
Opponents of the Theory of Relativity
Here you will find opponents of the theory of relativity known to me. There are meanwhile a large number of
opponents in the Internet. Many of the Internet sites listed have further links on this topic.
“Probably the most extensive documentation of criticism of the theory of relativity stems from G. O. Mueller;
about 3800 publications since 1908 are documented here. This documentation can be called up on Ekkehard
Friebe’s literature site.
Under http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de Ekkehard Friebe describes a particle theory of light. Ekkehard
Friebe’s site also offers a large number of literature tips and links.”
2012
205
G. O. Mueller: STR