03.12.2012 Views

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 9: <strong>The</strong> Thought Experiment<br />

Remarks: From a total <strong>of</strong> 300 topics there were altogether 196,700 call-ups. - Set up in February 2006 as a<br />

Forum to combat the critics <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> relativity E. Friebe, J. Lopez and G. O. Mueller, as a reaction to the<br />

opening <strong>of</strong> the forum by E. Friebe in November 2005. - Criticism <strong>of</strong> the theories <strong>of</strong> relativity is seen as a supposed<br />

“pseudo-science” and combated because it exposes the claim to validity <strong>of</strong> the relativist sect and its theory as a<br />

deception. According to this simple approach, for example, the claim that several different moving observers must<br />

measure the same speed for the same beam <strong>of</strong> light, would be “physical science” - and the critical question, as to<br />

where this claim has been confirmed in an experiment with several observers, would be “pseudo-science”. - In<br />

many contributions, instead <strong>of</strong> concentrating on the debate, criticism was instead directed at the persons <strong>of</strong> the<br />

critics, who were hatefully abused verbally, all under the motto <strong>of</strong> the forum: “Information from a scientific<br />

standpoint.”<br />

3<br />

Anti-Relativity.com - http://www.anti-relativity.com/forum<br />

An examination <strong>of</strong> the experimental evidence against Relativity<br />

> Discussion Areas > Miscellaneous Discussion<br />

090113 - Was Einstein a Communist? [100]<br />

4<br />

astronews - www.astronews.com/forum/<br />

astronews.com Forum > Sonstiges > Gegen den Mainstream<br />

[astronews.com Forum > Other Matters > Against the Mainstream]<br />

060213 - Critics <strong>of</strong> the <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Relativity Get Going! [34,100]<br />

060402 - Refutations from and with G.O. Mueller (I): ‘<strong>The</strong> Bringing-Into-Line <strong>of</strong> the Press’ [3700]<br />

060404 - Discussions About G. O. Müller - 23 Open Points Treated: Proposals for Discussion [20.000]<br />

060404 - Open Letter Addressed to Mr. Ekkehard Friebe and the G.O. Mueller Group [19,300]<br />

060427 - Research: Scientists Posthumously Instrumented by G. O. Mueller for References? [20,000]<br />

060514 - GOM is an Objective Documentation [2800]<br />

060511 - What is the Experimental Connection to c? [53.400]<br />

060521 - Points <strong>of</strong> Criticism [4100]<br />

060626 - Maurice Allais - Mystification <strong>of</strong> the <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Relativity [9600]<br />

060712 - G.O. Mueller / GOM Project Criticism <strong>of</strong> the <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Relativity [3200]<br />

060727 - G.O. Mueller - Criticism <strong>of</strong> the <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Relativity [3700]<br />

Remarks: Call-ups from 11 topics: 173,900<br />

An Entertaining Parody <strong>of</strong> the GOM Research Project Can be Found Under the T.:<br />

060303 - “Critic <strong>of</strong> the Arithmetic Get Going!”<br />

5<br />

Astronomie.de - Discussion Forums - http://forum.astronomie.de<br />

<strong>The</strong> meeting-point for astronomy<br />

> Forum > Diskutieren, vorstellen, treffen, Störungen melden> Diskussionsforum > Relativitätstheorie<br />

[> Forum > Discussing, introducing, meeting, reporting disorders > Discussion Forum > <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Relativity]<br />

051012 - <strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Relativity [2600]<br />

176<br />

G. O. Mueller: STR 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!