1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment
(4) The supposed findings of the scientists in 1967 with respect to security were perhaps true findings. The
supposed “findings” of the theory of relativity have been lies right from the start, for which reason the public
criticism of the great luminaries and the informing of the public finally had to be forbidden as from 1922.
(5) Complete correspondence in the lack of any control whatsoever by the public authorities - here until the
local election campaign! The activities of the government authorities are naturally directed on principle against the
citizens, if it must be feared that they might disturb the peace enjoyed by the authorities and disclose the
unwillingness or the inability of the authorities to act. Instead of exposing and pursuing the breaches of law, the
government authorities prefer to remain buddies of the lawbreakers for as long as possible.
(6) Statements made by critics, with their unwanted assessments, are simply eliminated by opposing, acceptable
assessment of the directors, as always. The scientific correctness is decided of the basis of positions of power, in the
one case as in the other.
(7) The Asse scientists appear to have forgotten, however, to bring the press into line. On the other hand, the
three sources reported nothing about the state of knowledge of the population and the behaviour of the media during
the 40 years. The disclosure, that the breakthrough had been brought about by the local election campaign, is too
vague. There is still a need here for further research.
(8) These parallels are still more gripping. In Asse the authorities are now at least attempting to divert the brine
around the nuclear waste. Could there be a better picture of the situation? In theoretical physics the criticism of the
theoretical rubbish has been effectively diverted since 1922.
(9) Result: The structural parallels are many and clearly apparent. The temporal and human dimensions of the
relativity catastrophe have not, however, been reached in Asse, fortunately.
2012
The Result of the Comparisons
The comparisons provide interesting results for the evaluation of the relativity catastrophe. Many structural and
intrinsic parallels to the other typical national scandals are clear:
(1) The breach of the law and violation of the ordinances.
(2) Long periods of secrecy vis-à-vis the public.
(3) In the cases involving government authorities, disinterest extending to downright refusal to exercise their
control functions. Instead, making deals with the lawbreakers up until the last possible moment.
(4) The sheer incredibility of the cases of fraud protects the cheaters from detection, because there are certain
cases of fraud that no one considers possible.
(5) The pattern of the double swindle or multiple swindle, in which the first swindle has to be covered up by a
second swindle. Here it can even be the second fraud that can prove to be decisive for the scandal.
(6) One parallel is surprising: the subject matter of the scandal is normally known to a limited circle of affected
persons over a period of years! In all such cases there is an informed milieu. Anyone interested in discovering the
conditions in a field of activities, need only keep his or her ears open. There is therefore no need for special,
anonymous informers, who divulge their information as “whistleblowers” on the telephone or meet with investigators
in multi-storey car parks. Everyone informed is aware of the situation for years - but the public is not informed.
There are two characteristics that appear to significantly distinguish the relativity catastrophe: the impressive
period of 85 years; and the successful bringing-into-line of the press and of the entire educational system. Both are
excellent examples of top performance by the physicists.
In terms of human dimension (12 million people) the relativists are perhaps only matched or exceeded by the
bankers, who for their part are top-ranked when it comes to material damage.
A particularly interesting question in connection with scandals is: Who or what triggered the scandals and by
what means? The concrete triggers were
- in the credit swindle of the banks: the inability of the mortgagor to pay;
- in the Telekom bugging affair: the change of personnel in the management board and the invoice of a firm
for the “investigation”;
- in the Siemens bribery scandal: The investigations of the public prosecutors have been continuing for years,
recently reinforced by the demands of the US stock-exchange supervisory board; a single trigger has so far not been
given in the reporting;
21
G. O. Mueller: STR