1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment I Tyskland er kritiske forfattere siden 1922 strengt forvist fra akademisk fysik, og de har derfor forenet de kritiske argumenter mod begge relativitetsteorierne i et hæfte med titlen “Hundert Autoren gegen Einstein”, 1931, som protesterer mod “Einsteinianernes terror”. Hæftet har intet at gøre med antisemitisme, som det var blevet hævdet af nogle relativister (men ikke af Einstein selv). Denne sammenfatning af kritik fra forfattere i adskillige lande er aldrig blevet besvaret af relativisterne og aldrig blevet taget alvorligt af det almindelige publikum. Den ofte udspredte idé, at Nazi-styret i Tyskland 1933-45 førte til rent antisemitisk argumentation i bøger og blade, der var kritisk over for relativiteten, er ikke blevet bekræftet af vor undersøgelse af de kritiske skrifter. For årene 1920-44 har vi kun fundet 17 kritiske skrifter af 14 tyske forfattere, som har tilføjet antisemitisk argumentation til deres videnskabelige kritik: dette er blot 3 procent af alle 570 tysksprogede skrifter fra denne periode. I kontrast til disse resultater har relativisterne for vane at bagvaske alle kritikere og deres skrifter som antisemitiske: denne løgn er et stærkt redskab, i det mindste i Tyskland efter Holocaust, og tjener til at presse enhver mulig kritik af relativitetsteorierne til tavshed. Under Nazi-styret i Tyskland mødtes desuden videnskabsmænd fra Nazi-partiet og erklærede relativister fra de akademiske kredse (det overvældende flertal) i München i november 1940 og blev enige om, at den specielle relativitetsteori skulle betragtes som et anerkendt grundlag for fysikken: dette var virkeligheden under Nazi-styret. Relativitetens kritikere havde den samme indflydelse på akademisk fysik som tidligere: ingen.” Hasslberger, Sepp - Blog http://blog.hasslberger.com/ Physics - Economy - New Energy - The only constant in this universe is change ... The Eclipse Data From 1919: The Greatest Hoax in 20th Century Science. By Richard Moody Jr. - Bibliography: “47. Mueller, G. O. and Kneckebrodt, K. (pseudonyms) 95 Years of Criticism of the Special Theory of Relativity (1908-2003) The G. O. Mueller Research Project [GOMProject Relativity] Germany 2006.” Hille, Helmut - HP www.helmut-hille.de/raetsel.html Reflections In and After the Einstein Year of 2005 - A Plea for Expertise and Reason. Enigmatic Einstein - Essays “(9) The Subject Matter of the Criticism My rejection of Einstein’s relativity is no isolated opinion. Yet because of the sheer number of possible points of criticism, the reasons given by the critics can vary. Apart from the semantic and scientific approaches listed by me there are also the purely physical reasons, as can be read in the book “Requiem für die Spezielle Relativität” [Requiem for the Special Theory of Relativity ] (see I/B3) and then again there are the purely mathematical reasons. It is often so that each individual point of criticism is itself adequate as a reason to reject the STR or the GTR, or both. One thing, however, is clear: since the existence of the theory of relativity it has been controversially discussed. There was, for example, an exhibition on the Deutsche Museum in Munich from 29th Sept. until 4th Dec. 2005, “Über Einsteins Gegner. Die antirelativistische Literatur der frühen 20er Jahre” [On Einstein’s Opponents. The Anti-Relativistic Literature of the Early 20s] . In a documentation from 2003 G.O. Müller has listed about 3,800 critical publications since 1908. [...] The support given by representatives of our Western society for democracy, freedom and tolerance vis-à-vis fundamentalist threats is implausible when these representatives at the same time allow that, in core questions of science, which are important for the orientation of both man and society and lie at the very heart of our own society, critical intelligence, objective criticism and alternative explanations are mercilessly suppressed, and this over decades. The 20th century in particular has again forcefully shown that societies in which the reality is unrecognized and in which there is no competition of ideas have no chance of standing the test of time. In the end, those propagating such lies inevitably drown in them. In order to inform our politicians about the suppression of every bit of criticism of the STR since 1922 and thereby of achieving an about-turn in this behaviour, G.O.Müller wrote an Open Letter in 2005 sent to each of the members of the German Bundestag, amongst others. (link to the letter at the end of this page)” 200 G. O. Mueller: STR 2012
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment Hille presents at the outset a wonderfully unique quotation of a physicist propagandist of the theories of Albert Einstein, which we have no wish to conceal from the reader: “For this reason it is irrelevant whether one understands the Master’s words; quite the contrary, in fact. Particularly the inconceivable and the mysterious reinforce the admiration we have for the genial thinker.” (Thomas Bührke, a physicist, in “Albert Einstein” dtv 2004). 2012 Hoffman, Johan; Johnson, Claes - HP http://www.nada.kth.se/~cgjoh/ambsthermo.pdf Computational Thermodynamics Applied Mathematics: Body & Soul Vol. 5 - Johan Hoffman and Claes Johnson 29th August 2007 References “[10] G. O. Mueller, Über die absoluten Grössen der speziellen Relativitätsteori, 2004, www.ekkehard-fribe.de.” IceyJones (Germany) - Blog www.youtube.com/user/IceyJones Channel of IceyJones - “IceyJones has added a video to his favourites. (5 days ago) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjkIBwh6Z_Q GOM - The Truth About G. ... The truth about the aims and intentions of G. O. Mueller on the abolish...” [falsification of a Jocelyne Lopez video.] [Indonesia:] Kelindan kata - Blog http://kelindankata.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/ May 13, 2008 at 10:13 a.m. (Uncategorized) Relasi Ilmu dengan Kebebasan Individu dalam Perspektif Anything Goes Qusthan Abqaryi Abstract Enlightenment always taken for granted as divesting project. Its emphasizing at reason often accepted as something freeing for scientists or researchers. The relationship between science and political structure prominently does not express individual liberty. Thereby this relationship always important to be examined. Feyerabend well-known as a controversial philosopher because he campaigned for methodological anarchism and anything goes. Anything goes inherently stands in methodological anarchism which is, according to Feyerabend, medicine for science in two conditions like fascist or chauvinistic. This research attempts a few paces which are inventarization, classification, and evaluation. Methodical path which attempts are critical analysis, synthesize, thereafter it will be descripted prominently. [...]” “Anything Goes dan Kebebasan Individu dalam Ilmu Metode anything goes tidak menyinggung komunikasi sebagai medan yang sangat penting dalam keilmuan kontemporer. Ketika ilmuwan mengalami persoalan dengan penyebarluasan gagasan atau penemuan, maka prinsip anarkistis seperti anything goes tidak dapat digunakan sebagai obat yang mujarab, terlebih ketika dunia komunikasi dan informasi telah terlembagakan secara massif melalui media massa. Persoalan yang dihadapi Mueller dkk., dalam menyebarluaskan kritisisme terhadap teori relativitas misalnya, tidak dapat diselesaikan secara arbitrer dengan menggunakan metode anything goes, karena jalan yang paling efektif dan efisien ialah penyebarluasan melalui media massa. Shrum dan Campion pernah meneliti mengenai kemungkinan isolasi ilmuwan di negara berkembang dari perkembangan ilmu secara global. Mereka percaya bahwa ilmuwan di negara yang sedang berkembang tidak 201 G. O. Mueller: STR
Page 1 and 2:
G. O. Mueller On the Absolute Magni
Page 3 and 4:
2012 Chapter 9: The Thought Experim
Page 5 and 6:
2012 Preface Chapter 9: The Thought
Page 7 and 8:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment 4
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment T
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment (
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment W
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment h
Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment t
Page 35 and 36:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment F
Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment c
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment I
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment r
Page 61 and 62:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment f
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment
Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment p
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment I
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment v
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment d
Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment s
Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment O
Page 107 and 108:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment a
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment t
Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment O
Page 121 and 122:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment -
Page 123 and 124:
Werner Dreibus Dr. Carl-Christian D
Page 125 and 126:
Johannes Röring René Röspel Dr.
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Albrecht, Jörg - FAZ - Science Alt
Page 131 and 132:
Stoldt, Hans-Ulrich - SPIEGEL - Ger
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
2012 The text of the letter is publ
Page 137 and 138:
168 Ted Chiang, London 169 CHICAGO
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
2012 Serial Numbers 2925-3124 / 200
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
to 2012 Chapter 9: The Thought Expe
Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment c
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
German Constitution.) Chapter 9: Th
Page 157 and 158: 2012 Chapter 9: The Thought Experim
Page 175 and 176: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment
Page 177 and 178: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment (
Page 187 and 188: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment 0
Page 189 and 190: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment 1
Page 197 and 198: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment N
Page 199 and 200: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment a
Page 201 and 202: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment T
Page 205 and 206: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment c
Page 207: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment F
Page 215 and 216: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment W
Page 219 and 220: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment P
Page 221 and 222: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment S
Page 223 and 224: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment R
Page 225 and 226: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment a
Page 229 and 230: Chapter 9: The Thought Experiment W
show all

1. The Need of New Approaches - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?