ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION IN FARM ANIMALS - Phenix-Vet

More documents

Recommendations

Info

150Artificial Insemination in Farm AnimalsBland J.M. & Altman D.G. (1999). Measuring agreement in method comparision studies. StatMethods Med Res 8, pp. (135-160)Brazil, C., Swan, S.H., Tollner, C.R., Treece, C., Drobnis, E.Z., Wang, C., Redmon, J.B. &Overstreet, J.W. (2004). Quality control of laboratory methods for semen evaluaionin a multicenter research study. J. Androl., 25, pp. (645 – 656)Carter, R.A., Ericsson, S.A., Corn, C.D., Weyerts, P.R., Dart, M.G., Escue, S.G. & Mesta J.(1998). Assessing the fertility potential of equine semen samples using the reducibledyes methylene green and resazurin. Arch Andro, 40, 1, pp. (59-66)Camus, A., Camugli, S., Leveque, C., Schmitt, E. & Staub, C. (2011). Is photomertry anaccurate and reliable method to assess boar semen concentration? Theriogenology,75, pp. (577-583)Choi, B.C. (1998). Slopes of a Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve and Likelihood Ratiosfor a Diagnostic Test. Am J Epidemiol, 148, pp. (1127-1132)Christensen, P., Stenvang, J. & Godfrey, W. (2004) A flow cytometric method for rapiddetermination of sperm concentration and viability in mammalian and aviansemen. J Androl, 25, 2, pp. (255-264)Christensen, P., Stryhn, H. & Hansen, C. (2005). Discrepancies in the determination of spermconcentration using Bürker-Türk, Thoma and Makler counting chambers.Theriogenology, 63, 4, pp. (992-1003)Cooper, T.A., Wang, S., Liu, Y., Bunch, T.D. & Holyoak, G.R. (1996). A new method toevaluate the viability of cryopreserved ram semen using a resazurin reductionassay. Theriogenology, 45, 1, pp. 313.Dart, M.G., Mesta, J., Creshaw, C. & Ericsson, S.A. (1994). Modified resazurin reduction testfor determining the fertility potential of bovine spermatozoa. Arch Androl, 33, pp.(71-75)Fuse, H., Okumura, M., Kazama, T. & Katayama T. (1993). Comparison of resazurin testresults with various sperm parameters. Andrologia, 25, pp, (153-157)Glass, R.H., Drouin, M.T., Ericsson, S.A., Marcoux, L.J., Ericsson, R.J. & Sullivan H. (1991).The resazurin reduction test provides an assessment of sperm activity. Fertil Steril,56, pp. (43-46)Greiner, M., Sohr, D.& Göbel, P. (1995). A modified ROC analysis for the selection of cut-offvalues and the definition of intermediate results of serodiagnostic tests. J ImmunolMethods, 185, pp. (123-132)Greiner, M., Pfeiffer, D. & Smith, R.D. (2000). Principles and practical application of thereceiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Prev <strong>Vet</strong> Med, 54, pp.(23-41)Hafez, E.S.E. (1993). Semen evaluation. In: Reproduction in Farm animals (6 th ed.). Hafez,E.S.E., pp. (405-423), Philadelphia, PAHansen, C., Vermeiden, T., Vermeiden, J.P.W., Simmet, C., Day, B.C. & Feitsma, H. (2006).Comparision of FACSCount AF system, improved Neubauer hemacytometer,Corning 254 photometer, SpermVision, UltiMate and NucleoCounter SP-100 fordetermination of sperm concentration of boar semen. Theriogenology, 66, pp. (2188-2194)Holt, W.V. & Medrano A. (1997). Assessment of boar sperm function in relation to freezingand storage. J Reprod Fertil, Suppl., 52, pp. (213-222)Imade, G.E., Towobola, O.A., Sagay, A.S. & Otubu, J.A. (1993). Discrepancies in sperm countusing improved Neubauer, Makler, and Horwells counting chambers Arch Androl,31, 1, pp. (17-22)
Evaluation of a New Method and Diagnostic Test in Semen Analysis 151Jensen, A.L. & Kjelgaard-Hansen, M. (2006). Method comparison in the clinical laboratory,<strong>Vet</strong> Clin Pathol., 35, pp. (276-286)Johnson, L.A., Weitze, K.F., Fiser, P. & Maxwell, W.M. (2000). Storage of boar semen. AnimReprod Sci, 62, pp. (143-172)Jones, R.G. & Payne, R.B., (1997). Analytical methods: control and comparison. In: ClinicalInvestigation and Statistics in Laboratory Medicine, Jones, R.G. & Payne, R.B., pp. (27-65), ACB Venture Publications, LondonJuonala, T., Lintukangas, S., Nurttila, T. & Andresson, M. (1998). Relationship betweensemen quality and fertility in 106 AI-Boars, Reprod Domest Anim, 33, pp. (155-158)Keel, B., Quinn, P., Schmidt, C., Serafy, N, Jr, Serafy, N. Sr. & Schalue, T. (2000). Results ofthe American association of Bioanalysts national proficiency testing programme inandrology, Hum Reprod, 15, pp (680-686)Knuth, U.A., Neuwinger, J. & Nieschlag, E. (1989). Bias to routine semen analysis byuncontrolled changes in laboratory environment – detection by long-term samplingof monthly means for quality control, Int J Androl, 12, pp. (375-383)Liu, D.Y. & Baker, H.W.G. (2002). Evaluation and assessment of semen for IVF/ICSI, Asian JAndrol, 4, pp. (281-285)Ma, D. & Smith, F.G. (2003). Correlation and regression. In: Key topics in Clinical Research,Smith, F.G. & Smith, J.R., pp. (147-151), BIOS Scientific Publishers Limited, OxfordMaatson, P. (1995). External quality assessment for semen analysis and sperm antibodydetection: results of a pilot scheme, Hum Reprod, 10, pp. (620-625).Mahmoud, A.M., Comhaire, F.H., Vermeulen, L. & Andreou, E. (1994). Comparison of theresazurin test, adenosine triphosphate in semen, and various sperm parameters,Hum Reprod, 9, pp. (1688-1693)Mahmoud, A.M.A., Depoorter, B., Piens, N. & Comhaire, F.H., (1997). The performance of 10different methods for the estimation of sperm concentration, Fertil and Steril, 68, 2,pp. (340-345)Martin, L.M., Crenshaw, C.C., Dean, J.A. Jr., Dart, M.G., Purdy, P.H. & Ericsson, S.A. (1999).Determination of the number of motile sperm within an ovine semen sample usingresazurin, Small Rumin Res, 32, pp. (161-165)Mesta, J., Ericsson, S.A., Dart, M.G., Wansley, R.G. & Weyerts, P.R. (1995) Assesment offertility potential of porcine spermatozoa using the reducible dyes methylene greenand resazurin. Journal of Animal Science, 73, (Suppl. 1), pp. (26)Mrkun, J., Kosec, M., Zakošek, M., Zrimšek, P. (2007). Method agreement betweenmeasuring of boar sperm concentration using makler chamber and photometer.Acta vet (Beogr.), 57, 5/6, pp. (563-572)Neuwinger, J., Behre, H.M. & Nieschlag, E. (1990). External quality control in the andrologylaboratory: an experimental multicenter trial, Fertil Steril, 54, pp. (308-314)Petrunkina, A.M., Waberski, D., Günzel-Apel, A.R. & Töpfer-Petersen, E. (2007).Determinants of sperm quality and fertility in domestic species. Reproduction, 134,pp. (3-17)Petrie, A. & Watson, P. (1999). Additional Topics. In: Statistics for veterinary and animalscience, Petrie, A., Watson, P., pp. (168-181), Blackwell Science, OxfordPrathalingam, N., Holt, W., Revell, S., Jones, S. & Watson, P. (2006). The precision andaccuracy of six different methods to determine sperm concentration. J Androl, 27, 2,pp. (257-262)Quintero-Moreno, A., Rigau, T. & Rodriguez-Gil, J.E. (2004). Regression analysis and motilesperm subpopulation structure study as improving tools in boar semen qualityanalysis, Theriogenology, 61, pp. (673-690)
Page 3 and 4:
VIContentsChapter 9Evaluation of a
Page 5:
XPrefaceless stress to the female,
Page 8 and 9:
2Artificial Insemination in Farm An
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
10Artificial Insemination in Farm A
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107: 100Artificial Insemination in Farm
Page 206 and 207:
200Artificial Insemination in Farm
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306:
show all

ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION IN FARM ANIMALS - Phenix-Vet

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?