13.07.2015 Views

ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION IN FARM ANIMALS - Phenix-Vet

ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION IN FARM ANIMALS - Phenix-Vet

ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION IN FARM ANIMALS - Phenix-Vet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

92Artificial Insemination in Farm AnimalsKuster, C (2005). Sperm concentration determination between hemacytometric and CASAsystems: Why they can be different? Theriogenology, Vol.64, pp. 614–617, ISSN 0093-691XKuster, C.E. & Althouse, G.C. (1999). The fecundity of porcine semen stored for 2 to 6 daysin Androhep R and X-cell TM extenders. Theriogenology, Vol.52, pp. 365–376, ISSN0093-691X0Langendijk, P.; Bouwman, E.; Kidson, A.; Kirkwood, R.; Soede, N. & Kemp, B. (2002). Roleof myometrial activity in sperm transport through the genital tract and infertilization in sows. Reproduction, Vol.123, pp. 683-690, ISSN 1470-1626Langendijk, P.; Bouwman, E.G.; Schams, D.; Soede, N.M. & Kemp, B. (2003). Effects ofdifferent sexual stimuli on oxytocin release, uterine activity and receptive behaviorin estrous sows. Theriogenology, Vol.59, pp. 849-61, ISSN 0093-691XLangendijk, P.; Soede, N.M. & Kemp, B. (2006). Effects of boar stimuli on the follicular phaseand on oestrus behaviour in sows. Society for Reproduction and Fertility Supplement,Vol.62, pp. 219-30, ISSN 1470-1626López, A.; Rijsselaere, T.; Van Soom, A.; Leroy, J.L.; De Clercq, J.B.; Bols, P.E. & Maes, D.(2010). Effect of organic selenium in the diet on sperm quality of boars. Reproductionin Domestic Animals, Vol.45, pp. 297-305, ISSN 0936-6768López, A.; Rijsselaere, T.; Bijttebier, J.; Vyt, Ph.; Van Soom, A. & Maes, D. (2011).Effectiveness of the sperm quality analyzer (SQA-Vp) for porcine semen analysis.Theriogenology, Vol.75, pp. 972-977, ISSN 0093-691XMaes, D.; Nauwynck, H.; Rijsselaere, T.; Mateusen, B.; Vyt, Ph.; de Kruif, A. & Van Soom, A.(2008). AI transmitted diseases in swine: an overview. Theriogenology, Vol.70, pp.1337-1345, ISSN 0093-691XMaes, D.; Rijsselaere T.; Vyt, Ph.; Sokolowska, A.; Deley, W. & Van Soom, A. (2010).Comparison of five different methods to assess the concentration of boar semen.Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift, Vol.79, pp. 42-48, ISSN 0303-9021Mahmoud, A.; Depoorter, B.; Piens, N. & Comhaire, F. (1997). The performance of 10different methods for the estimation of sperm concentration. Fertility and Sterility,Vol.68, pp. 340–345, ISSN 1556-5653Martin-Rillo, S.; Martinez, E.; Garcia C.;Artiga C. & De Alba, C. (1996). Boar semenevaluation in practise. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, Vol.31, pp. 519-526, ISSN0936-6768Peña, F.; Saravia, F.; Garcia-Herreros, M.; Nunes-Martinez, I.; Tapia, J.; Johannisson, A.;Wallgren, M. & Rodriquez-Martinzez, H. (2005). Identification of spermmorphometric subpopulations in two different portions of the boar ejaculate and itsrelation to post-thaw quality. Journal of Andrology, Vol.26, pp. 716-723, ISSN 0196-3635Pérez-Llano, B.; Lorenzo, J.; Yenes, P.; Trejo, A. & Garcia-Casado, P. (2001). A short hypoosmoticswelling test for the prediction of boar sperm fertility. Theriogenology,Vol.56, pp. 387-398, ISSN 0093-691XPetrunkina, A.; Gröpper, B.; Günzel-Apel, A. & Töpfer-Petersen, E. (2004). Functionalsignificance of the cell volume for detecting sperm membrane changes andpredicting freezability in dog semen. Reproduction, Vol.128, pp. 829-842, ISSN 1470-1626

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!