13.07.2015 Views

ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION IN FARM ANIMALS - Phenix-Vet

ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION IN FARM ANIMALS - Phenix-Vet

ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION IN FARM ANIMALS - Phenix-Vet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

178Artificial Insemination in Farm Animalsrelevant after cervical insemination as, in comparison to fresh spermatozoa, a relativelysmall proportion of the stored cells penetrates the cervical canal and migrates through theuterus of the ewe to the oviducts (Salamon and Maxwell, 2000). Spermatozoa functionallyaffected during liquid storage may not migrate, or may migrate slowly, and their survival inthe female tract is also reduced to about half that of fresh spermatozoa (Salamon andMaxwell, 2000). Attempts to improve the transport of spermatozoa from the posterior cervixto the oviducts of oestrous ewes by prostaglandins added to stored semen have givenconflicting results (Maxwell and Salamon, 1993).In the non-pregnant ewe, the funnel-shaped rings of the cervix, which average around fivein number, are not concentrically aligned, and their openings are constricted in mostinstances to less than 3 mm (King et al, 2004). As explained above, breed is an importantdeterminant of the morphology of the cervix, and that could at least partially explaindifferences in fertility after cervical AI (Kaabi et al., 2006). Many studies have found apositive correlation between the depth of cervical AI and fertility (Kaabi et al., 2006). Inconsequence, numerous efforts have been made to develop new methods to deposit thesemen as deep as possible into the uterus. Studies based on the use of modified pipettes, orhormones such as oxytocin to dilate the cervical canal, have shown that cervical penetrationcan be improved. However, fertility results have been very variable (Kaabi, et al., 2006).Special care should be taken to avoid cervical trauma with the catheter during AI, as it hasbeen associated with reductions in pregnancy and lambing rates (Kaabi et al., 2006).Secondary effects of oxytocin may also have an adverse effect on fertility (King, 2004).4.5.2 TechnicianThe ability of the inseminator may be another important source of variation of the outcomeof sheep AI (Gordon, 1997; Anel et al., 2005). Cervical penetration rates are influenced byoperator skill (Eppleston and Maxwell, 1993), and the establishment of training programmesis highly recommended.4.5.3 Stress around AIThere is some evidence that nutritional or management stress inflicted upon the ewe aroundAI can markedly reduce fertility by interfering with fertilisation or by increasing earlyembryo mortality rates (Gordon, 1997). Ewes and rams should be handled with theminimum of disturbance and receive good nutrition around oestrus and the first weeks afterAI.5. AcknowledgementsThe authors thank Neil Macowan for assistance with the English translation. This work wassupported by the Araid Foundation (grant OTRI 2010-0464), Spanish MIC<strong>IN</strong>N (grant IPT-010000-2010-33) and OVIARAGON S.C.L. (grant OTRI OTRI 2010-0465).6. ReferencesAbecia, J.A., Forcada, F. & Gonzalez-Bulnes, A. (2011). Pharmaceutical Control ofReproduction in Sheep and Goats. <strong>Vet</strong>erinary Clinics of North America-Food AnimalPractice, Vol.27, No.1, (Mar), pp. 67-+, 0749-0720

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!