Glass Melting Technology: A Technical and Economic ... - OSTI
Glass Melting Technology: A Technical and Economic ... - OSTI
Glass Melting Technology: A Technical and Economic ... - OSTI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
entrainment by reducing melter size (i.e. surface area reduced over 90%), gas flow, impingement<br />
<strong>and</strong> turbulence.<br />
Volatiles: The melt rate of the plasma arc melter system is anticipated to be 10-20 times greater<br />
per unit surface area than conventional fuel fired melter systems. The reduction in surface area<br />
per ton, <strong>and</strong> the presence of unmelted batch on the melt surface, are expected to reduce the<br />
volatilization of boron <strong>and</strong> fluorine, as well as volatile alkaline species. The amount of<br />
improvement will be a function of the batch composition, melt rate (i.e. kinetics), <strong>and</strong> the<br />
localized melt surface temperatures. .<br />
The following is a summary of data referenced in OIT’s Energy <strong>and</strong> Environmental Profile (April<br />
2002), <strong>and</strong> anticipated improvements that are expected from the demonstration. Where available,<br />
the technical basis or logic behind the improvement has been provided.<br />
Furnace/<br />
segment<br />
Particulate<br />
(lb/ton)<br />
SOx<br />
(lb/ton)<br />
NOx<br />
(lb/ton)<br />
CO<br />
(lb/ton)<br />
Fluoride<br />
(lb/ton)<br />
Insulation Fiber <strong>Glass</strong><br />
Regen/Recup 0.02-1.08 10 1.7-5 0.25 0.11-0.12<br />
Gas-Direct 9 0.6 0.3 0.25 0.12<br />
Textile Fiber <strong>Glass</strong><br />
Regen/Recup 2-16 3-30 20 0.5-1.0 2<br />
Gas-Direct 6 ND 20 0.9 2<br />
Pressed/Blown <strong>Glass</strong> (Uncontrolled)<br />
All 17.4 5.6 16.8-27.2 0.2 ND<br />
Plasma Improvement Estimates<br />
Improvement >50% 25-50% >90% 100% 25-50% 100%<br />
Reference Textile Textile Textile All Textile All<br />
Basis Notes 1 2, 4 3 4 2 4<br />
H2O, CO2<br />
(combustion)<br />
(lb/ton)<br />
1) 90-95% reduction in gas flow relative to gas firing combustion product emissions<br />
2) Surface area for equivalent melt rate is 75-90% less than conventional melters of similar<br />
throughput (Plasma at < 1 sf/ton/day, versus 4-15 sf/ton/day for conventional melters)<br />
3) Argon torch gas, limited reaction volume, high temperature gradients<br />
4) No partial combustion or other combustion products due to elimination of carbon based fuel<br />
sources; no sulfur contamination in fuels<br />
Also, many experts agree that the ability to use gas-fired melters will be compromised in the 10- to<br />
20-year time frame. Plasma technology is a natural alternative to gas-fired melters. Investment in<br />
plasma technology now will provide the technology required in the future.<br />
<strong>Economic</strong> Benefits<br />
High Priority Target Markets for this plasma melting system (size shown in tons per year*):<br />
169