03.12.2012 Views

Glass Melting Technology: A Technical and Economic ... - OSTI

Glass Melting Technology: A Technical and Economic ... - OSTI

Glass Melting Technology: A Technical and Economic ... - OSTI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

periods. Natural gas is the preferred fossil fuel for glass melting in the United States, with heat content ranging<br />

from 900 to 1000 Btu/ft 3 . Light to heavy fuel oil has heat content between 135,000 <strong>and</strong> 155,000 Btu/US gal.<br />

Heavy fuel oil (#5, #6) is viscous at low temperatures <strong>and</strong> must be heated before being fed to burners, where it<br />

is atomized with compressed air for combustion or mechanically atomized to save 7 percent energy by avoiding<br />

heating the cold atomizing air to flame temperature.<br />

Gas-fired regenerative furnaces are about 20 to 35 percent or as high as 41 percent efficient when comparing<br />

actual energy consumption to theoretical requirements. Container furnaces are higher efficiency than the Color<br />

Television (CTV) furnace. When oxygen is substituted for air, oxygen reduces the fuel required to melt a unit of<br />

glass. For a well-engineered soda-lime glass furnace, fuel reduction with conversion to oxy-fuel is typically 10<br />

to 15 percent. Oxy-fuel firing can reduce energy consumption by eliminating the majority of the nitrogen from<br />

the combustion atmosphere <strong>and</strong> reducing the volume of waste gas emissions by 60 to 80 percent. Energy<br />

consumption can be reduced because the atmospheric nitrogen does not have to be heated to the temperature of<br />

the flames, <strong>and</strong> a lower volume of hot combustion products exit the furnace.<br />

However, the most flexible furnaces are electrically boosted, fossil fuel tank furnaces that use combined energy<br />

sources rather than a single fuel. By directly applying electrical energy to molten glass by electrodes, glass is<br />

melted more efficiently—2 to 3.5 times greater than by using fossil fuels. But production of electricity from<br />

fossil fuel at the power plant is only about 30-percent efficient.<br />

Electric furnaces lose less heat from the structure <strong>and</strong> have no costly regenerators or recuperators to repair or<br />

replace. Electric furnaces are about 85 percent efficient due to the high thermal insulation of the batch (blanket)<br />

on the melt surface. In addition the water-cooling jackets on molybdenum electrodes pull additional heat. The<br />

first 3 percent of furnace energy applied nearly offsets these heat losses through electrode contacts. Less than 10<br />

percent of melters are all electric after more than 70 years of application <strong>and</strong> 25 percent are oxy-fuel after only<br />

14 years.<br />

III.2. Traditional furnace designs<br />

Heat to melt glass is provided by burning fossil fuels above a bath of continuously fed batch material <strong>and</strong><br />

continuously withdrawing molten, founded glass from a furnace. For melting <strong>and</strong> refining the glass, the<br />

temperature depends on the formulation of the melt but is between 2372 <strong>and</strong> 2822˚F (1300 <strong>and</strong> 1550˚C) Heat<br />

transfer is dominated by radiative transmission from the refractory superstructure that is heated by the flames to<br />

up to 3002˚F (1650˚C), <strong>and</strong> from the flames themselves. In each furnace design heat input is arranged to<br />

recirculate convective currents within the melted batch materials to ensure consistent homogeneity of the<br />

finished glass that is fed into the forming process. The mass of molten glass in the furnace is held constant <strong>and</strong><br />

the mean residence time is about 24 hours of production for container furnaces or about 72 hours for some float<br />

glass furnaces.<br />

Traditional designs in operation in current glass manufacturing are regenerative, recuperative, oxy-fuel fired,<br />

electric, mixed-fuel furnaces pot/day tank, unit melters. A furnace is chosen based on<br />

the requirements of a glass manufacturer.<br />

• Regenerative furnace<br />

More than 50 percent of industrial glass furnaces in the US are regenerative furnaces. The maximum<br />

theoretical efficiency of a regenerator is 80 percent because the mass of waste gases from a furnace exceeds that<br />

of the incoming combustion air <strong>and</strong> the heat capacity of exhaust gases exceeds that of combustion air. The<br />

efficiency of the furnace is limited by cost <strong>and</strong> structural losses are greater as the size of regenerators increases.<br />

A regenerative furnace design with greater than 70 to 75 percent efficiency is difficult to conceive.<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!