Contents

References 469Sax, L. J., Astin, A. W., Lindholm, J. A., Korn, W. S., Saenz, V. B., & Mahoney, K. M.(2003). The American freshman: National norms for fall 2003. Los Angeles: Higher EducationResearch Institute, UCLA.Schacter, D. L. (1996). Searching for memory. New York: Basic Books.Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology:Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115–129.Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1997). Eight common but false objections to the discontinuationof significance testing in the analysis of research data. In L. L. Harlow,S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 37–64).Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Schmidt, W. C. (1997). World-Wide-Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems,and solutions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 274–279.Schoeneman, T. J., & Rubanowitz, D. E. (1985). Attributions in the advice columns:Actors and observers, causes and reasons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,11, 315–325.Schuman, H., Presser, S., & Ludwig, J. (1981). Context effects of survey responses toquestions about abortion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 216–223.Schwartz, P. (2010, January/February). Love, American style. The AARP Magazine.Scoville, W. B., & Milner, B. (1957). Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampallesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 20, 11–19.Seale, C. (Ed.). (1999). The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage.Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychologyprogress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421.Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimentaldesigns for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Shapiro, K. J. (1998). Animal models of human psychology: Critique of science, ethics, andpolicy. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.Sharpe, D., Adair, J. G., & Roese, N. J. (1992). Twenty years of deception research: Adecline in subjects’ trust? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 585–590.Shiffman, S., & Paty, J. (2006). Smoking patterns and dependence: Contrasting chippersand heavy smokers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 509–523.Sieber, J. E., Iannuzzo, R., & Rodriguez, B. (1995). Deception methods in psychology:Have they changed in 23 years? Ethics & Behavior, 5, 67–85.Simmons, R. A., Gordon, P. C., & Chambless, D. L. (2005). Pronouns in marital interaction:What do “you” and “I” say about marital health? Psychological Science, 16,932–936.Simon, H. A. (1992). What is an “explanation” of behavior? Psychological Science, 3,150–161.Singer, P. (1990). The significance of animal suffering. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13,9–12.Skinner, B. F. (1966). Operant behavior. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas ofresearch and application (pp. 12–32). New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts.Skitka, L. J., & Sargis, E. G. (2005). Social psychological research and the Internet: Thepromise and the perils of a new methodological frontier. In Y. Amichai-Hamburger (Ed.),The social net: The social psychology of the Internet. New York: Oxford University Press.Smith, J. A., Harré, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (1995). Idiography and the case study. InJ. A. Smith, R. Harré, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking psychology (pp. 59–69).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Smith, T. W. (1981). Qualifications to generalized absolutes: “Approval of hitting” questionson the GSS. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 224–230.