04.12.2012 Views

Final Programme

Final Programme

Final Programme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A-228 09:15<br />

PET/CT in esophageal and GI cancer<br />

E. Bombardieri; Milan/IT<br />

Learning Objectives:<br />

1. To demonstrate the value of PET in characterising cancer.<br />

2. To describe the impact in patient management.<br />

3. To defi ne the value of PET/CT over the conventional imaging.<br />

Postgraduate Educational <strong>Programme</strong><br />

A-229 09:35<br />

Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST): Volumetric method and functional parameters<br />

H.-O. Peitgen; Bremen/DE<br />

Learning Objectives:<br />

1. To learn about fundamental benefi ts of 3D volumetry in contrast to 2D measurements for the estimation of<br />

tumor growth.<br />

2. To understand that volumetric measurements provide subvoxel accurate lesion size assessment whereas<br />

diameter based estimates suffer from high risk of misclassifi cation.<br />

3. To understand the infl uence of error propagation on the computation of change rates.<br />

4. To learn about state of the art tumor perfusion analysis with dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging.<br />

Panel discussion 09:55<br />

08:30 - 10:00 Room K<br />

Physics in Radiology<br />

RC 913<br />

Display quality and diagnostic accuracy<br />

Moderators:<br />

M. Gambaccini; Ferrara/IT<br />

J. Reponen; Raahe/FI<br />

A-230 08:30<br />

A. Characterisation of reporting monitors<br />

E. Samei; Durham, NC/US<br />

Learning Objectives:<br />

1. To learn about imaging characteristics of monitors.<br />

2. To learn how to measure the main characteristics of monitors.<br />

3. To learn how to prevent malfunctioning.<br />

A-231 09:00<br />

B. How to objectively characterise and compare the performances of conventional and digital<br />

detectors<br />

F.R. Verdun, P. Monnin; Lausanne/CH<br />

Learning Objectives:<br />

1. To defi ne the basic parameters of image quality for conventional and digital detectors.<br />

2. To present methodologies to assess MTF (pre-sampled and expected MTFs), NPS, NEQ and DQE.<br />

3. To illustrate the effect of beam quality and detector entrance dose on detectors’ effi ciency (DQE).<br />

4. To discuss advantages and limitations of detector assessments by means of alternative methods such as<br />

the use of contrast-detail test-objects.<br />

myESR.org<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

195<br />

Sunday

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!