Videoconferencing in Removal Hearings: A Case Study of the ...

. h\~~}U! JO u0ge~ol pue ~}ea
.""'nuT n Y""""Y' Y"""'T
:UU!iI Ie~:rJ
:~umu S,A~WOUV
« :(#V ':mmu ~u!1Q~p) ~!U°m ~M. pnp SJ~q;s!1lJO ~SB;)
- lStpUOW X!S ~seI ~1IJ U! ~~U~~l~l nOA ~Aeq ~U~!P p~U~~P AtmW 1\\oq ~noqv (J
l;)~A ~sn nOA P!P AtmW 1\\oq 1IJ!1\\ '~soq~ JO (Z
lWOO~OO ::np 1I! ;)J.AJO ~sn ~1IJJO SUO!S~ldW! 11u~~g mOA~.rn ~e\{M (E
(t
"siiU!JB~q :JlAJo s}~~dS1? ~y!:>~ds }noqB nOh ~S1? II.I MON
- i.s8~q h1m iiu!IDp sw~[qold [B~!uq~~} h1m p~~u~~dx~ nOh ~ABH °B
"q
'0
'p
i.l~}unO~U~ nOh P!P sw~[qOld JO spup( re1lM "!
l,S~W!} A1mW MOH '!!
SA;}DJOnv JOj SDOnS;}no M;}!AJ;}JDI
l,SW~IqoJd UO~}~JdJ~}U! A1m P~~>U~!l~dx~ nOA ~AeH
l,J~}unoou~ nOA P!P sW~IqoJdJo spup{ rellM '!
- ls~w!J AIrnW MOq 'os JI '!!
, . lS~lqOJd l~suno~ OJ ss~~:>e A~ u~~S nOA ~A~H
lJ~Juno~u~ nOA P!P sW~lqOJd JO spup[ J~qM '!
l.sawn AImW MOq 'os JI '!!
l.SWaIqold AmHuap!Aa/p!U°W!1sa1 AIm pa~ua!ladxa nOA aA~H
1.~1uno~ua nOA P!P swalqOJd JO SPU!){ 1~ttM "!
lS~WH A1mW M.oq 'os JI .!!
(l:)AO)