Videoconferencing in Removal Hearings: A Case Study of the ...

I1mP!A!pUI/JatsuW DNnlV3H-ffild .V
ffiIOa3JO~d DNI~V3H om
"I
'Z
.£
OJ'
.s~U!~Jd hpo~sn:>/pUoq JOj ~cb:>x~ s~u~~q 118 JOj ~u~wn:>op ~U!~J8q:>
~~ t.p!A\ ~AJ~S U~ ~A8q ~snw ~U~pUod~J ~~ ~mp ~ON '~u~wn:>op
~U~J8q:> ~tp S~A!~:>aJ ~OJ U0ge~!WWI ~~ aJOj~ PI~q ~q h8W q:>!1{h\
~U!l~q ApO~sn:>/Puoq e jO ~Un:>npuo:> ~q~ S! ~lnJ S!q~ O~ U09cb:>x~ ~U
(OOOZ) (e)tr£ § ~'.~rJ 8 aas 'PI~q ~q o~ S! ~u~q ~~ ~l~qA\ ~!S JO ~!:>
~q~ J~AO 10~uo:> ~A9~s!u!wpe gU!A8q ~noJ U09~!WWI ~~ Aq ~A!~J
u~~q seq ~u~wn:>op ~U~J8q:> ~q~ H~un ~:>u~wwo:> ~ou hew S~U!P~OJd
PInoqs a~pnf UOHB~!WWI alp a}'ep ~U!lBaq :>!uoqdala} atIt O} J°!ld
suoH'eInd9S q~tr.U O} ~uaJaJUoo 1'e!-Q-aJd 'e t:>npuoo O} ~!1J'ed a~1Unooua
.~u~aq alp]o tpSuaI
aqt U~:J.Ioqs mJ\\ S!tU. 1J1\0:> alp Aq UOH1Uap!SUO~ JO] s~nss! J\\OJ.mU pU'e
.UO9tQU~wn~op
l~tpO pUB ~~U~P!A~ A.ItQU~wn~op ~gUBq~X~ o~ ~!pBd lIB ~l!nb~)I
~JB s~91Bd nB ~Bq~ ~lnSU~ O~ IT1j~sn ~q UB=> S~=>U~J~jUO=> =>!Uoqool~~ =>oq-PV
~8pnf uO!tBJ8!WWI ~tp ~JOj~ pUB lBPU~IB=> dn-nB=> B uo S! ~SB=> B U~qM lOO~
IT1j~ B S! WS!UBq~W S!ttl 'A~!=> 1!~~P B ~B ~ln~q=>s SB ~=>old O~ Ap~J
'SNI Aq p~~B=>!pnfpB Afl~doJd u~~q SBq ISL-I WJod
JO O£1-I WJod B JO/pUB ~IY AI~w!t u~~q ~ABq SU09B=>!lddB j! ~U!WJ~~~p o~
DNnIV3H dO J.N3W3JN3WWOJ Ql ~ nId .9
'UO!P~UUO:> ~l{~
}O At!Jel:> ~tp '~l{:> o~ A~!u1t1Joddo ue plO}}e oSle 1I!h' S!1U. 'nOA ~q ue:>
A~l{~ pue l~'eoos ~q~ l{~nOJl{~ AfJe~p W~l{~ l~l{ ue:> nOA ~etp os P~uo!~!sod
lie ~le (~u~s~ld S! ~UO }O 1~~~ldJ~1U! ~q1 pue s~!ped ~tp 1el{1 ~lnsu3 . I
'Z
AIuO sa)[Bt aJnpa:x)Jd aJ!tua S!1U "auoqd 8U!A!a:>aJ al{} Ot UO!SS!WSUBJtaJ
JOj at!llat~ aqt Ot IaAtUt tsnw a:>!OA s,Ja~s aqt tBqt SU1r.)W S!tU "atHPtBS
suoHB:>!unwwo:>aIat B jO SUBaw Aq apBW aq ll!M sU°!t:>auuo:> AUBW
S! tuawatBts aJ9ua aqt reqt 8u!Jt1sua snqt '8up[1r.)ds aJojaq spuo:>as aaJqt
asnBd Ot sa9JBd aqt PTUtSU! nOA tBI{} tU1QJodw! s! t! tnq spuo:>as aaJqt tnoqB
"8up[1r.)ds aJojaTUtSUI "papJO=>aJ
All~3N3D 'V